Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety Considerations and Local Tumor Control Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of T1b Renal Tumors

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To retrospectively assess the safety and oncological efficacy of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation (CA) of T1b (> 4 cm/< 7 cm) renal tumors.

Materials and Methods

Institutional electronic records were retrospectively reviewed to identify the patients who had undergone percutaneous CA of T1b renal tumors between 2008 and 2016. CA was proposed by a multidisciplinary tumor board for cases with poor renal function or a single kidney; unsuitable for surgical resection; or genetic syndromes predisposing to multiple hereditary renal tumors.

Patients’ demographics, procedural and follow-up data were accurately collected and analyzed.

Results

Twenty-seven consecutive patients (12 females, 15 males; mean age 72.3 ± 14.3 years) were included. Mean tumor diameter was 47.9 ± 6.3 mm. MRI guidance was used in 6/27 cases (22.2%) and CT guidance in the remaining 21/27 (77.8%) cases. Hydro- and/or carbo-dissections were necessary in 21/27 cases (77.8%). Complications graded ≥ II were reported in three (11.1%) patients. Technical success and technical efficacy were 100 and 87.5%, respectively. Local tumor control (LTC) evaluated at imaging follow-up ≥ 6 months was 82.6, 72.3 and 60.3% at 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-up, respectively. One patient passed away 3 months after CA due to the metastatic evolution of the primary kidney cancer.

Conclusion

Percutaneous CA of T1b renal tumors is safe and satisfactory rates of LTC are expected at the early follow-ups. Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term efficacy of this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. Bethesda. National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/.

  2. Smith SJ, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN. Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection. Radiology. 1989;170(3 Pt 1):699–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009;181(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller DC, Schonlau M, Litwin MS, Lai J, Saigal CS. Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer. 2008;112(3):511–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA, Mandrekar J, Kurup AN, Weisbrod AJ, et al. Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):461–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jasinski M, Siekiera J, Chlosta P, Mikolajczak W, Drewa T. Radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses as an alternative to nephron-sparing surgery: preliminary results. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2011;6(4):242–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson RH, Atwell T, Schmit G, Lohse CM, Kurup AN, Weisbrod A, et al. Platinum priority—kidney cancer comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur Urol. 2015;67(2):252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Atwell TD, Vlaminck JJ, Boorjian SA, Kurup AN, Callstrom MR, Weisbrod AJ, et al. percutaneous cryoablation of stage t1b renal cell carcinoma: technique considerations, safety, and local tumor control. JVIR. 2015;26(6):792–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons RB, Canter D, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. RENAL nephrometry scoring system: the radiologist’s perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(3):W355–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015;67(5):913–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxwell AWP, Baird GL, Iannuccilli JD, Mayo-smith WW, Dupuy DE. Renal cell carcinoma: comparison of RENAL nephrometry and PADUA scores with maximum tumor diameter for prediction of local recurrence after thermal ablation. Radiology. 2017;283(2):590–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caputo PA, Zargar H, Ramirez D, Andrade HS, Akca O, Gao T, et al. Cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal tumors: a matched group comparative analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;71(1):2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volpe A, Amparore D, Mottrie A. Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(5):403–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patard JJ, Pantuck AJ, Crepel M, Lam JS, Bellec L, Albouy B, et al. Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):148–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okhunov Z, Moreira DM, Del Junco M, Abedi G, Lobko II, Kaler KS, et al. Predictors of complications after percutaneous image-guided renal cryoablation for T1a renal cortical neoplasms. J Endourol. 2017;31(1):7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurup ANAN. Percutaneous ablation for small renal masses-complications. Semin Interv Radiol. 2014;31(1):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kakarala B, Frangakis CE, Rodriguez R, Georgiades CS. Hemorrhagic complications of percutaneous cryoablation for renal tumors: results from a 7-year prospective study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39(11):1604–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atwell TD, Farrell MA, Leibovich BC, Callstrom MR, Chow GK, Blute ML, et al. Percutaneous renal cryoablation: experience treating 115 tumors. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2136–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodrum DA, Atwell TD, Farrell MA, Andrews JC, Charboneau JW, Callstrom MR. Role of intraarterial embolization before cryoablation of large renal tumors: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(6):930–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Hebbadj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hebbadj, S., Cazzato, R.L., Garnon, J. et al. Safety Considerations and Local Tumor Control Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of T1b Renal Tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 449–458 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1820-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1820-0

Keywords

Navigation