Abstract
Purpose
To understand how cultural differences between vascular surgeons (VSs) and interventional radiologists (IRs) affect their clinical decision making and inter-specialty relationships.
Methods
Twenty-four conversational interviews were conducted with IRs and VSs about their approaches to patient care, views of their specialty and others, and solutions to any expressed concerns. Interview transcripts were systematically analyzed to identify and compare key themes according to the constructivist grounded theory and content analysis using NVivo 10 software. These data were supplemented with a retrospective analysis of 3658 endovascular stent placements performed at a large medical academic center over 11 years. Aggregate counts were divided by provider specialty, and trends were assessed via correlation coefficients.
Results
Endovascular stent placements were relatively equally divided between IR and VS over 11 years with some variability from placements by cardiology. IRs tend to lay claim to treatments as masters of procedures, whereas VSs base their claims on being masters of the treated diseases, leading to collaboration in some practices and bitter competition in others. The level of perceived competition was most associated with specialists’ awareness of and appreciation for specialty-specific values rather than differences in practice structure/reimbursement.
Conclusions
Understanding cultural differences between IRs and VSs is imperative for fostering better collaboration to grow shared territory rather than competing for the same slice of the pie.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Naylor AR. A surgeon’s view on endarterectomy and stenting in 2011: lest we forget, it’s all about preventing stroke. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2012;35(2):225–33.
Choke E, Sayers R. Viewpoint: adaptation of vascular surgery in the interventional era. Heart. 2015;101(5):342–5.
Lakhan SE, Kaplan A, Laird C, Leiter Y. The interventionalism of medicine: interventional radiology, cardiology, and neuroradiology. Int Arch Med. 2009;2(1):27.
Veith FJ. A look at the future of vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(4):885–90.
Serra H. Medical technocracies in liver transplantation: drawing boundaries in medical practices. Health. 2010;14(2):162–77.
Zetka JR Jr. Establishing specialty jurisdictions in medicine: the case of American obstetrics and gynaecology. Soc Health Illn. 2011;33(6):837–52.
Oh H. Your money or your life: how doctors learn the business of health. Thesis, Sociology, UCLA; 2014.
Bosk CL. Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
Burford B. Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):143–52.
Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB. Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(2):235–62.
Fiol CM, Pratt MG, O’Connor EJ. Managing intractable identity conflicts. Acad Manag Rev. 2009;34(1):32–55.
Ellingson LL. The roles of companion in geriatric patient—interdisciplinary oncology team interactions. J Aging Stud. 2002;16:361–82.
Cook DA, Holmboe ES, Sorensen KJ, Berger RA, Wilkinson JM. Getting maintenance of certification to work: a grounded theory study of physicians’ perceptions. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(1):35–42.
Ghant MS, Sengoba KS, Recht H, Cameron KA, Lawson AK, Marsh EE. Beyond the physical: a qualitative assessment of the burden of symptomatic uterine fibroids on women’s emotional and psychosocial health. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(5):499–503.
Korpershoek Y, Vervoort S, Nijssen L, Trappenburg J, Schuurmans MJ. Factors influencing exacerbation-related self-management in patients with COPD: a qualitative study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2977–90.
Suddaby R. From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(4):633–42.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59.
Keller EJ, Vogelzang RL, Freed BH, Carr JC, Collins JD. Physicians’ professional identities: a roadmap to understanding “value” in cardiovascular imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):52.
Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1979.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006.
Ciulla JB. Ethics, the heart of leadership. 2nd ed. Westport: Praeger; 2004.
Weber LJ. Business ethics in healthcare: beyond compliance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2001.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank our data analyst Anna Pawlowski as well as Eric Russell, MD, and Tod Chambers, PhD, for their invaluable suggestions while preparing this article.
Funding
This work was supported by a Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation’s Dr. and Mrs. W.C. Culp Student Research Grant and the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse (NMEDW) Pilot Data Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Statement
This study was approved by an institutional review board (STU: 00105347). Potential physician participants were contacted directly by the primary investigator. If agreeable, informed consent was obtained and documented.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, E.J., Collins, J.D., Crowley-Matoka, M. et al. Why Vascular Surgeons and Interventional Radiologists Collaborate or Compete: A Look at Endovascular Stent Placements. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40, 814–821 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1570-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1570-z