Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiological Insertion and Management of Peritoneovenous Shunt

  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to report our experience of the management of complications following the insertion of a peritoneovenous shunt for intractable malignant ascites. From June 1999 to January 2006, 26 patients underwent insertion of a peritoneovenous shunt for ascites by interventional radiologists. We have used ultrasound and shuntography to assist in the diagnosis of the cause of shunt blockage. Successful techniques for the restoration of the shunt function include port- pumping, stripping of any fibrin sheath, and revision of either the venous or peritoneal catheter. The procedure was initially successful in all patients with continued patency until death in 17. A further four patients are still alive with a functioning shunt. There was one rapid postprocedure death resulting from pulmonary edema. Two patients developed pneumothorax, managed successfully with either a chest drain or aspiration. Shunt dysfunction occurred eight times in seven patients. There were five successful revisions in four patients. Overall, shunt patency has been maintained in 80.1% of patients. Shunt dysfunction is seen in a significant number of patients, but successful revision of the shunt can be achieved in the majority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rozenblit GN, Del Guercio LRM, Rundback JH (1998) Peritoneal-urinary drainage for treatment of refractory ascites: A pilot study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 9(6):998–1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Millard FC, Powis SJA (1988) Management of intractable malignant ascites using the Denver peritoneo-venous shunt. J R Coll Surg Edinb 33:138–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Faught W (1995) Peritoneo-venous shunt for palliation of gynecologic malignant ascites. J Am Coll Surg 180:472–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wickremesekera SK, Stubbs RS (1997) Peritoneo-venous shunting for malignant ascites. NZ Med J 110:33–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanon C (2002) Palliative treatment of malignant refractory ascites by positioning of Denver peritoneovenous shunt. Tumori 88(2):123–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JS, (2001) Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt creation for the treatment of benign and malignant refractory ascites. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12(12):1445–1448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orsi F (2002) Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt positioning: technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 12:1188–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hussain FF, Meer ZF, Lopez AJ (2004) Peritoneovenous shunt insertion for intractable ascites: A district general hospital experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:325–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Macdonald S, Watt SJ, McNally D, et al. (2000) Comparison of technical success and outcome of tunnelled catheters inserted via the jugular and subclavian approaches. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:225–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tyburski JG, Joseph AL, Thomas GA, et al. (1993) Delayed pneumothorax after central venous access: A potential hazard. Am Surg 59:587–589

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gammie JS, Banks MC, Fuhrman CR, et al (1999) The pigtail catheter for pleural drainage: A less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 3:57–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray RJ, Levitin A, Buck D, et al. (2000) Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion of mal-functioning well-positioned tunnelled central venous dialysis catheters: A prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:1121–1129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Savader SJ, Ehrman KO, Porter DJ, et al. (2001) Treatment of hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths by rt-PA infusion: Critical analysis of 124 procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12:711–715

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Merport M, Murphy TP, Egglin TK, et al. (2000) Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunnelled hemodialysis catheters: Randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garofalo RS, Zaleski GX, Lorenz JM, et al. (1999) Exchange of poorly functioning tunnelled permanent haemodialysis catheters. Am J Roentgenol 173:155–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krutchen AE, Bjarnason H, Stackhouse DJ, et al. (1996) The mechanisms of positional dysfunction of subclavian venous catheters. Radiology 200:159–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR, et al. (1990) Pinch-off syndrome: A complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 177:353–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Foroulis CN, Desimonas NA (2005) Massive pneumoperitoneum: A late complication of the Denver pleuro-peritoneal shunt. Ann Thorac Surg 80(4):e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. F. Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bratby, M.J., Hussain, F.F. & Lopez, A.J. Radiological Insertion and Management of Peritoneovenous Shunt. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30, 415–418 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-006-0213-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-006-0213-6

Keywords

Navigation