Abstract
Residents are one of the most significant stakeholder groups in ecologically vulnerable regions, and the local ecological environmental governance efforts require their active cooperation and participation. To this end, this study leverages the sampled survey data from residents across 14 cities in Guangxi, China, and uses a structural equation modeling analysis to explore the impact of environmental education perception on residents’ ecological security behavior. The results indicate that psychological ownership of nature plays a positive mediating role between environmental education perception and residents’ ecological security behavior, as well as between ecological consciousness and residents’ ecological security behavior, thereby supporting the idea that a sense of stewardship in protecting ecological security is a key factor in residents’ conversion of their ecological protection cognition into practical actions. Further research finds that visual fluency has a moderating effect on the relationship between environmental education perception and psychological ownership of nature. This study provides new insights into the theoretical understanding of the formation mechanism of residents’ ecological security behavior, enriches the theory of psychological ownership, and offers policy recommendations for governments implementing ecological environmental propaganda programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas A, Chengang Y, Zhuo S, Manzoor S, Ullah I, Mughal YH (2022) Role of responsible leadership for organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in light of psychological ownership and employee environmental commitment: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychol 12(2):6469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756570
Ahmad W, Kim WG, Anwer Z, Zhuang W (2020) Schwartz personal values, theory of planned behavior and environmental consciousness: how tourists’ visiting intentions towards eco-friendly destinations are shaped? J Bus Res 110:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.040
Ari E, Yilmaz V (2017) Effects of environmental illiteracy and environmental awareness among middle school students on environmental behavior. Environ Dev Sustain 19:1779–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9826-3
Arundati R, Sutiono HT, Suryono IA (2020) Effect of ecological awareness, personal norms and ecological attitude to conservation behavior. Proc Eng Sci 2(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.24874/PES02.02.009
Ayhan AB, Mutlu B, Aki E, Aral N (2015) A study of conceptual development and visual perception in six-year-old children. Percept Mot Skills 121(3):832–839. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.10.PMS.121c22x7
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94
Blijlevens J, Thurgood C, Hekkert P, Chen LL, Leder H, Whitfield TW (2017) The aesthetic pleasure in design scale: the development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychol Aesthet Creativity Arts 11(1):86–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098
Boca GD, Saraçli S (2019) Environmental education and student’s perception, for sustainability. Sustainability 11(6):1553
Bouzari M, Safavi HP, Foroutan T (2022) Outcomes of environmental awareness. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 34(10):3655–3676. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1412
Brinck I (2018) Empathy, engagement, entrainment: the interaction dynamics of aesthetic experience. Cogn Process 19(2):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0805-x
Brown G, Pierce JL, Crossley C (2014) Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. J Organ Behav 35(3):318–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1869
Campbell Pickford H, Joy G, Roll K (2016) Psychological ownership: effects and applications. Said Bus Sch WP 32:1–16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893092
Candrianto C, Aimon H, Sentosa SU (2023) The role of knowledge, awareness and environmental attitudes in green product management. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 9(1):101–112. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2023.01.08
Cherdymova EI, Vorobyeva KI, Romashkova OV, Mashkin NA, Grigoriev SM, Romanchenko LN, Bayanova AR (2018) Photo exhibition influence on student environmental consciousness formation. Ekoloji 27(106):1271–1278
Chiu YTH, Lee WI, Chen TH (2014) Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: antecedents and implications. Tour Manag 40:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.013
Cho WC, Lee KY, Yang SB (2018) What makes you feel attached to smartwatches? The stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) perspectives. Inf Technol People 32(2):319–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2017-0152
Dawkins S, Tian AW, Newman A, Martin A (2017) Psychological ownership: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav 38(2):163–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
De Lauwere C, Slegers M, Meeusen M (2022) The influence of behavioural factors and external conditions on Dutch farmers’ decision making in the transition towards circular agriculture. Land Use Policy 120:106253
Dean KP, Bertling JG (2020) Eco-visualizations: facilitating ecological relationships and raising environmental awareness. Art Educ 73(3):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1717823
Deliana Y, Rum IA (2019) How does perception on green environment across generations affect consumer behaviour? A neural network process. Int J Consum Stud 43(4):358–367
Donato C, Adıgüzel F (2022) Visual complexity of eco-labels and product evaluations in online setting: Is simple always better? J Retail Consum Serv 67:102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102961
Douglas SP, Craig CS (1983) Examining performance of US multinationals in foreign markets. J Int Bus Stud 14(3):51–63
Fang J, Wen ZL, Liang DM, Li NN (2015) Moderation effect analyses based on multiple linear regression. J Psychol Sci 38(03):715–720. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.03.001
Fang J, Wen ZL, Zhang MQ, Sun PZ (2014) The analyses of multiple mediation effects based on structural equation modeling. J Psycholl Sci 51(03):735–741. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.03.001
Felix R, Almaguer J (2019) Nourish what you own: psychological ownership, materialism and pro-environmental behavioral intentions. J Consum Mark 36(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2417
Fingerhut J, Gomez-Lavin J, Winklmayr C, Prinz JJ (2021) The aesthetic self. the importance of aesthetic taste in music and art for our perceived identity. Front Psychol 11(3):577703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577703. 1-18
Gao M, Hu Y, Bai Y (2022) Construction of ecological security pattern in national land space from the perspective of the community of life in mountain, water, forest, field, lake and grass: a case study in Guangxi Hechi, China. Ecol Indic 139:108867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108867
Goldstone RL, Landy DH, Son JY (2010) The education of perception. Top Cogn Sci 2(2):265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01055.x
Gong W-J, Du Z-Y (2019) Is it in accordance with cognition? From environmental problems perception to environment-friendly behavior—moderating effect of environmental knowledge, media use and informal network communication. J China Univ Geosci (Soc Sci Ed) 19(04):72–83. https://doi.org/10.16493/j.enki.42-1627/c.2019.04.007
Grinstein A, Hagtvedt H, Kronrod A (2019) Aesthetically (dis) pleasing visuals: a dual pathway to empathy and prosocial behavior. Int J Res Mark 36(1):83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.003
Hadler M, Haller M (2011) Global activism and nationally driven recycling: the influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior. Int Sociol 26(3):315–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910392258
Hu CS(2022) Comprehensive study on Xi Jinping’s thought of humanity and nature harmony. Soc Sci Hunan 35(05):1–7. DOI:CNKI:SUN:FLSH.0.2022-05-001
Hu C, Wu Z (2022) They can and will: preschoolers encourage pro-environmental behavior with rewards and punishments. J Environ Psychol 82:101842
Hui CH, Triandis HC (1985) Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 16(6):131–152
Hungerford HR, Volk TL (1990) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. J Environ Educ 21(3):8–21
Jami A, Kouchaki M, Gino F (2021) I own, so I help out: how psychological ownership increases prosocial behavior. J Consum Res 47(5):698–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa040
Jia Y, Cheng S, Shi R (2021) Decision-making behavior of rural residents’ domestic waste classification in Northwestern of China——analysis based on environmental responsibility and pollution perception. J Clean Prod 326:129374
Jin J, Suntrayuth S (2022) Knowledge sharing motivation, behavior, and creativity of knowledge workers in virtual organizations. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2022:4358132. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4358132
Kahsay GA, Kassie WA, Beyene AD, Hansen LG (2022) Pro-environmental behavior under bundled environmental and poverty reduction goals: empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 112:105798
Kautish P, Paul J, Sharma R (2019) The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior. J Clean Prod 228:1425–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389
Kim HJ, Jang JM (2018) The easier the better: how processing fluency influences self-efficacy and behavioral intention in pro-social campaign advertising. Sustainability 10(12):4777
Korpela KM (1989) Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. J Environ Psychol 9(3):241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80038-6
Kumar J, Nayak JK (2019) Exploring destination psychological ownership among tourists: antecedents and outcomes. J Hosp Tour Manag 39:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.006
Kunchamboo V, Lee CK, Brace-Govan J (2017) Nature as extended-self: sacred nature relationship and implications for responsible consumption behavior. J Bus Res 74:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.023
Kuo HM, Su JY, Wang CH, Kiatsakared P, Chen KY (2021) Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior: the mediating role of destination psychological ownership. Sustainability 13(12):6809
Kusumasondjaja S (2019) Exploring the role of visual aesthetics and presentation modality in luxury fashion brand communication on Instagram. J Fash Mark Manag: Int J 24(1):15–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2019-0019
Lange F, Truyens M (2022) Mixed evidence for the effect of virtual nature exposure on effortful pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 81:101803
Lee Y, Chen AN (2011) Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. J Manag Inf Syst 28(3):269–308. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280308
Li F, Zhu YY (2020) The impact of implicit design cues of brand logo on consumer brand creativity perception. J Technol Econ 39(10):155–164
Li WM, Yin CQ, Tang WY, Li XM, Yang DX, Zhang YL (2019) Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of bird-watching tourists:taking natural empathy and perception of environmentaleducation as mediating variables. Econ Geogr 39(01):215–224. https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.01.026
Li Y (2018) Study of the effect of environmental education on environmental awareness and environmental attitude based on environmental protection law of the People’s Republic of China. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 14(6):2277–2285
Liobikienė G, Poškus MS (2019) The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere pro-environmental behavior: modifying the value-belief-norm theory. Sustainability 11(12):3324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123324
Liu J, Wang H, Hui C, Lee C (2012) Psychological ownership: how having control matters. J Manag Stud 49(5):869–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01028.x
Lu MS, Wang ZF (2018) Study on relationship estimate between change of ecological tourists’behavior and natural environment change. Resour Dev Mark 34(03):397–402
Lu X (2015) Water environmental problems, environmental protection attitudes and residents’ action strategies: an analysis of 2010CGSS data. Shandong Soc Sci 29(01):70–76. https://doi.org/10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2015.01.010
Luo PC, Zhao XX, Tang YX, Wang ZN, Zheng JL (2021) The impact of environmental education perception on tourists’ environmental responsibility behavior –Based on SOR theory perspective. J Chongqing Technol Bus Univ (Soc. Sci. ed.) 39(04):117–126
Luzar EJ, Diagne A, Ecgan C, Henning BR (1998) Profiling the nature-based tourist: a multinomial logit approach. J Travel Res 37(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759803700106
Ma Z, Guo S, Deng X, Xu D (2022) Place attachment, community trust, and farmer’s community participation: evidence from the hardest-hit areas of Sichuan, China. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 73:102892
Maleksaeidi H, Keshavarz M (2019) What influences farmers’ intentions to conserve on-farm biodiversity? An application of the theory of planned behavior in fars province, Iran. Glob Ecol Conserv 20:e00698
Matilainen A, Pohja-Mykrä M, Lähdesmäki M, Kurki S (2017) I feel it is mine!”–Psychological ownership in relation to natural resources. J Environ Psychol 51:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.002
Meiboudi H, Karimzadegan H, Khalilnejad SMR (2011) Enhancing children’s environmental awareness in kindergarten of Mashhad city using mural painting. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 28:1020–1028
Mishal A, Dubey R, Gupta OK, Luo Z (2017) Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 9(5):682–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2016-0168
Mishra S, Malhotra G, Chatterjee R, Abdul WK (2023) Ecological consciousness and sustainable purchase behavior: the mediating role of psychological ownership. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 35(2):414–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2021-0591
Montazeri, S (2013). Design for behavior change: the role of product visual aesthetics in promoting sustainable behavior (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan Deep Blue Repository. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/97805
Moshagen M, Thielsch MT (2010) Facets of visual aesthetics. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 68(10):689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
Mundher R, Abu Bakar S, Maulan S, Mohd Yusof MJ, Osman S, Al-Sharaa A, Gao H (2022) Exploring awareness and public perception towards the importance of visual aesthetics for preservation of Permanent Forest Reserve (PFR) in Malaysia. Land 11(8):1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081280
Ozler H, Yilmaz A, Ozler D (2008) Psychological ownership: an empirical study on its antecedents and impacts upon organizational behaviors. Probl Perspect Manag 6(3):38–47
Park HH, Jeon JO, Sullivan P (2015) How does visual merchandising in fashion retail stores affect consumers’ brand attitude and purchase intention? Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 25(1):87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2014.918048
Peck J, Shu SB Eds.) (2018) Psychological ownership and consumer behavior. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland
Peck J, Kirk CP, Luangrath AW, Shu SB (2021) Caring for the commons: using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. J Mark 85(2):33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920952084
Pierce JL, Jussila I (2011) Psychological ownership and the organizational context: theory, research evidence, and application. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England
Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 26(2):298–310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028
Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Rev Gen Psychol 7(1):84–107
Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. (2021). Report on the investigation of citizens’ ecological and environmental behavior. http://www.prcee.org/zyhd/202112/t20211225_965281.html
Preston SD, Gelman SA (2020) This land is my land: psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership. J Environ Psychol 70:101443
Ramezani Nia M, Shokouhyar S (2020) Analyzing the effects of visual aesthetic of Web pages on users’ responses in online retailing using the VisAWI method. J Res Interact Mark 14(4):357–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2018-0147
Rezaei R, Safa L, Ganjkhanloo MM (2020) Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management-an application of the technology acceptance model. Glob Ecol Conserv 22:e00941
Rickinson M (2001) Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environ Educ Res 7(3):207–320
Rustam A, Wang Y, Zameer H (2020) Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. J Clean Prod 268:122016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122016
Saari UA, Damberg S, Frömbling L, Ringle CM (2021) Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: the influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecol Econ 189:107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155
Saqib ZA, Zhang Q, Ou J, Saqib KA, Majeed S, Razzaq A (2020) Education for sustainable development in Pakistani higher education institutions: an exploratory study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Int J Sustain High Educ 21(6):1249–1267
Sarasso P, Neppi-Modona M, Sacco K, Ronga I (2020) Stopping for knowledge”: the sense of beauty in the perception-action cycle. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 118:723–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.004
Shen M, Wang J (2022) The impact of pro-environmental awareness components on green consumption behavior: the moderation effect of consumer perceived cost, policy incentives, and face culture. Front Psychol 13:580823
Sirivongs K, Tsuchiya T (2012) Relationship between local residents’ perceptions, attitudes and participation towards national protected areas: a case study of Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area, central Lao PDR. For policy Econ 21:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.04.003
Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Su F, Song N, Shang H, Wang J, Xue B (2021) Effects of social capital, risk perception and awareness on environmental protection behavior. Ecosyst Health Sustain 7(1):1942996
Su L, Huang S, Pearce J (2019) Toward a model of destination resident–environment relationship: the case of Gulangyu, China. J Travel Tour Mark 36(4):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2019.1568954
Van Doorn J, Mende M, Noble SM, Hulland J, Ostrom AL, Grewal D, Petersen JA (2017) Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. J Serv Res 20(1):43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679272
Van Dyne L, Pierce JL (2004) Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav 25(4):439–459
van Valkengoed AM, Abrahamse W, Steg L (2022) To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour. Nat Hum Behav 6:1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01473-w
Vieira VA (2010) Visual aesthetics in store environment and its moderating role on consumer intention. J Consum Behav 9(5):364–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.324
Wang L, Pang YS (2012) A review of regional ecological security evaluation. Appl Mech Mater 178:337–344
Wang T, Mukhopadhyay A, Patrick VM (2017) Getting consumers to recycle NOW! When and why cuteness appeals influence prosocial and sustainable behavior. J Public Policy Mark 36(2):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.089
Wang X, Fielding KS, Dean AJ (2022) Psychological ownership of nature: a conceptual elaboration and research agenda. Biol Conserv 267:109477
Wang X, Fielding KS, Dean AJ (2023) Nature is mine/ours”: measuring individual and collective psychological ownership of nature. J Environ Psychol 85:101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101919
Wang YJ, Hernandez MD, Minor MS (2010) Web aesthetics effects on perceived online service quality and satisfaction in an e-tail environment: the moderating role of purchase task. J Bus Res 63(9-10):935–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.016
Wyss AM, Knoch D, Berger S (2022) When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: the role of costs, benefits, and self-control. J Environ Psychol 79:101748
Xu SJ (2017) Perceived Tourism Ecological Security and Its Influences in Wetland Ecotourism Areas from the Perspective of Residents (Doctoral dissertation). Available from https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFDLAST2018&filename=1017867464.nh
Xu ZM, Jiang TH, Guo LF (2022) The influence of place attachment on tourist citizenship behavior in the context of vacation tourism: based on the perspective of psychological ownership. J Zhejiang Univ 49(06):767–780. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2022.06.016
Yang MX, Tang X, Cheung ML, Zhang Y (2021) An institutional perspective on consumers’ environmental awareness and pro‐environmental behavioral intention: evidence from 39 countries. Bus Strategy Environ 30(1):566–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2638
Yoo J, Kim M (2014) The effects of home page design on consumer responses: moderating role of centrality of visual product aesthetics. Comput Hum Behav 38:240–247
Zhai, J Rao, M, & Wang, Y (2020). Analysis and evaluation of urban ecological security in China(2019). J China Emerg Manag Sci 5(05):17–33. DOI:CNKI:SUN:YZGL.0.2020-05-003
Zhang H (2018) The antecedents of local residents’ destination brand psychological ownership. Tour Hosp Prospects 2(04):31–51
Zhang Y, Xiao X, Cao R, Zheng C, Guo Y, Gong W, Wei Z (2020) How important is community participation to eco-environmental conservation in protected areas? From the perspective of predicting locals’ pro-environmental behaviours. Sci Total Environ 739:139889
Funding
This work was supported by Annual Project in 2023 for the 14th Five-Year Plan of Guangxi Educational Science (Grant No. 2023A078), Humanities and Social Science Project of Guangxi Universities (Grant No.2021QGRW059).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZL,YZ and JC wrote the main manuscript text, CX prepared figures of the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, Z., Zou, Y., Xu, C. et al. The Effects of Environmental Education on Residents’ Ecological Security Behavior: The Mediating Role of Nature’s Psychological Ownership Perspective and The Moderating Role of Visual Fluency. Environmental Management 73, 338–353 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01883-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01883-0