Abstract
When the construction of the Lyon-Turin segment of the new European high-speed rail network was first publicly announced at the beginning of the 1990s, it immediately found fierce opposition from the inhabitants of Susa Valley, Italy, one of the areas to be cut across by such infrastructure. At issue were the project’s potential environmental impact and its consequences on public health. This study intends to clarify environmental risk perception and public debate between the national government, local advocacy groups, and the inhabitants of Susa Valley. Two major phases of public reaction were identified: (1) an initial rebellious period of no real dialog among the project’s major stakeholders (exemplified by the popular “No TAV” [No High Speed Train] movement), followed by (2) a yielding period of intense multilateral negotiations centered on the activities of the “Lyon-Turin Environmental Observatory.” The results of a qualitative cross analysis of the residents’ perception of the proposed high-speed rail revealed that public acceptance of risk in Susa Valley was influenced by the characteristics of hazards perceived by the residents and by the communicative approach used by the project’s various stakeholders. It also emerged that early dialog among all the parties involved was critical in forming a personal viewpoint on risk, which, once consolidated, defied new information and perspectives. Likely, a greater and earlier care taken by the other stakeholders to inform and consult the local population about the railway would have greatly eased the public debate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambiente Piemonte – ARPA (2003) Indici demografici e struttura della popolazione della Valle di Susa, Turin, Italy, 17 pp
Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambiente Piemonte – ARPA (2004) Indagine sullo stato di contaminazione dei suoli da parte di inquinanti organici nel territorio della Valle di Susa, Turin, Italy, 12 pp
Alexander DE (1993) Natural disasters. UCL Press, London, UK, 632 pp
Alexander DE (2000) Confronting catastrophe: new perspectives on natural disasters. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 282 pp
Andreatta M, della Porta D (2002) Changing forms of environmentalism in Italy: the protest campaign on the high speed railway system. Mobilization: An International Journal 7 (1) http://www.mobilization.sdsu.edu/articleabstracts/071dellaportaandretta.html. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
Bojórquez-Tapia LA, Sánchez-Colon S, Flore Martinez A (2005) Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modelling and sensitivity analysis. Environmental Management 36(3):469–481
Boyce G (2000) Public discourse and decision making: exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 13(1):27–64
Cancelli C, Sergi G, Zucchetti M (2006) Travolti dall’alta voracità. Odradek Edizioni, Rome, Italy, 240 pp
Cedolin M (2006) T.A.V. in Val di Susa. Arianna Editrice, Cesena, Italy, 136 pp
COWI Engineering (2006) Analisi degli studi condotti da LTF in merito al progetto Lione-Torino (sezione internazionale). Technical Report for the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, 158 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/priority_projects/doc/2006-04-25/2006_ltf_final_report_it.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
Dantas A, Seville E (2006) Organisational issues in implementing an information sharing framework: lessons from the Matata flooding events in New Zealand. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14(1):38–52
Davenport MA, Leahy JE, Anderson DH, Jakes PJ (2007) Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39(3):353–368
De Marchi B, Pellizzoni L, Ungaro D (2001) Il rischio ambientale. Il Mulino, Bologna, Italy, 224 pp
Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture. University of California Press, Berkeley CA, USA
European Commission (2001) White paper—European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 119 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/white_paper/documents/doc/lb_texte_complet_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
European Commission Energy and Transport Directorate-General (2005) Trans–European Transport Network. Ten-T priority axes and project 2005. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 73 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/projects/doc/2005_ten_t_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
Fornero E, Bellis D, Tomatis M, Bruna L, Piazzano P, Schellino G, Belluso E, Fubini B (2005) A cattle model of environmental exposure to asbestos in Lanzo and Susa valleys (Piedmont region): possible fiber accumulation mechanism in cow lungs. European conference on asbestos monitoring and analytical methods. December 5–7, 2005, Venice, Italy
Gattiglio M, Sacchi R (2006) Lineamenti geologici della Val di Susa lungo il tracciato del progetto TAV Torino-Lione. Rendiconti della Società Geologica Italiana 3(Nuova Serie):13–19
Gazzano E, Riganti C, Tomatis M, Turci F, Bosia A, Fubini B, Ghigo D (2005) Potential toxicity of non-regulated asbestiform minerals: balangeroite from Western Alps. Part 3: depletion of antioxidant defences. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 68(1):41–49
Geren PR (2001) Public discourse: creating the conditions for dialogue concerning the common good in a postmodern heterogeneous democracy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20:191–199
Gras P, Tonini V (1991) Le valli di Susa. Il bacino della Dora Riparia. Il Capitello, Turin, Italy
Gray CP, Stern RM, Biocca M (1999) La comunicazione dei rischi ambientali per la salute in Europa. Edizioni Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy
Gu L, Sheate WR (2005) Institutional challenges for EIA implementation in China: a case study of development versus environmental protection. Environmental Management 36(1):125–142
Guastini G (2006) TAV in Val di Susa. Le ragioni di una lotta. Massari Editore, Bolsena, Italy, 142 pp
Hermansson H (2007) The ethics of NIMBY conflicts. Ethic Theory Moral Practice 10(1):23–34
International Union of Railways (2008) General definition of high-speed. http://www.uic.asso.fr/gv/article.php3?id_article=14. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
Italian Law 19 febbraio 1994, n. 109. Legge quadro in materia di lavori pubblici. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n. 41 del 19 febbraio 1994, Supplemento Ordinario n. 29, Rome, Italy
Italian Law 21 December 2001, n. 443. Delega al Governo in materia di infrastrutture ed insediamenti produttivi strategici ed altri interventi per il rilancio delle attività produttive. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n. 299 del 27 dicembre 2001, Supplemento Ordinario n. 279, Rome, Italy
Lindell MK, Perry RW (2003) Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Sage Publications, London, UK, 272 pp
Margaira O (2005) Adesso o mai più. Diario della formazione di una coscienza ambientalista e di un impegno civile contro il progetto di alta velocità ferroviaria in Valle di Susa. Edizioni del Graffio, Borgone Susa, Italy, 176 pp
Margerum RD (2008) A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41:487–500
Marincioni F (2001) A cross-cultural analysis of natural disaster response: the northwest Italy floods of 1994 compared to the U.S. Midwest floods of 1993. The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster 19(2):209–236
Marincioni F (2007) Information technologies and the sharing of disaster knowledge: the critical role of professional culture. Disasters 31(4):459–476
Nash CA (1991) The case for high speed rail. Institute of transport studies. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, Working Paper 323
Pavia R (2006) Sintesi dei punti di criticità geologiche progetto ferroviario alta velocità/capacità Torino Lione. ARPA Piemonte, Turin, Italy, 39 pp
Perry RW, Quarantelli EL (2005) What is a disaster?: new answers to old questions. Xlbris, Philadelphia, USA, 444 pp
Sacchi R, Balestro G, Cadoppi P, Carraro F, Delle Piane L, Di Martino L, Enrietti M, Gallarà F, Gattiglio M, Martinotti G, Perello P (2004) Studi geologici in Val di Susa finalizzati ad un nuovo collegamento ferroviario Torino-Lione. Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Monografie, XLI, Turin, Italy, 117 pp
Selin S, Chavez D (1995) Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19(2):189–195
Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan Publication, London, UK, 518 pp
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1985) Characterizing perceived risk. In: Kates RW, Hohenemser C, Kasperson J (eds) Perilous progress: managing the hazards of technology. Westview, Boulder, CO, USA, pp 91–125
Watzlawick P, Helmick Beavin J, Jackson D (1967) Pragmatics of human communication: study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. W W Norton & Co Ltd., New York, USA, 296 pp
Zanchini E (2002) Procedure semplificate ed appalti. In: Prinsciantelli G (ed) Atti del convegno opere strategiche l’attuazione della legge obiettivo. Federazione dei Verdi. http://www.verdi.it/document/leggeobiettivo/3.htm. Accessed 27 Nov 2008
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to the residents of Susa Valley who responded to the survey and were willing to share with us their thoughts on the high-speed rail project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marincioni, F., Appiotti, F. The Lyon-Turin High-Speed Rail: The Public Debate and Perception of Environmental Risk in Susa Valley, Italy. Environmental Management 43, 863–875 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9271-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9271-2