Skip to main content
Log in

Regionalization of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Japan: Balancing the Proximity Principle with Economic Efficiency

  • PROFILE
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proximity principle—disposing of waste close to its origin—has been a central value in municipal solid waste (MSW) management in Japan for the last 30 years and its widespread adoption has helped resolve numerous “Not in My Backyard” issues related to MSW management. However, MSW management costs have soared, in large part because of aggressive recycling efforts and because most MSW is incinerated in a country that has scarce landfill capacity. In addition, smaller, less sophisticated incinerators have been closed because of high dioxin emissions. Rising costs combined with the closure of smaller incinerators have shifted MSW management policy toward regionalization, which is the sharing of waste management facilities across municipalities. Despite the increased use of regionalized MSW facilities, the proximity principle remains the central value in Japanese MSW management. Municipal solid waste management has become increasingly regionalized in the United States, too, but different driving forces are at work in these two countries. The transition to regionalized MSW management in Japan results from strong governmental control at all levels, with the central government providing funds and policy direction and prefectures and municipalities being the primary implementing authorities. By contrast, market forces are a much stronger force with US MSW management, where local governments—with state government oversight—have primary responsibility for MSW management. We describe recent changes in Japan’s MSW programs. We examine the connections between MSW facility regionalization, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the proximity principle, coordination among local governments, central government control, and financing mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broadbent J (2005) Japan’s environmental politics: Recognition and response processes. In: H. Imura M. Schreurs (eds) Environmental policy in Japan. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 102–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Environmental Council (Chuo Kankyo Shingikai) (2001) Results of study on fundamental issues of waste management and recycling systems (Haikibutsu Risaikuru Seido no Kihonmondai ni Kansuru Kentoukekka ni Tsuite). Technical Committee on Fundamental Issues of Waste Management and Recycling Systems, Recycling Group under Central Environmental Council (in Japanese)

  • Eight Prefectures and Cities Waste Management Committee (2003) The status of industrial solid waste in eight prefectures and cities (Hachi Tokenshi Sangyouhaikibutsu Touitsu Jittaichousa Houkokusho) (in Japanese)

  • Environmental Group of Industrial Structure Council (Sangyo Kouzou Shingikai) of Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2006) Discussions on Containers and Packaging Recycling Law (Youki Housou Risaikuru Hou no Hyouka Kentou ni Kannsuru Houkokusho (in Japanese)

  • Honda A (1998) Waste management in danger (Gomi Taisaku ga Abunai): Illustrated guides to solutions to waste management problems, Shouenerugi sentah (in Japanese)

  • Japan Center for Cities (1998) A study on cities and waste management (Toshi to Haikibutsukanri ni Kansuru Chousakenkyu Houkoku): A report from urban policy study group in 1997 (in Japanese)

  • Kaufman SM, Goldstein N, Millrath K, Themelis NJ (2004) The state of garbage in America. BioCycle 45:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto A, Oka T, Yoshida K, Nakanishi J (2001) Cost effectiveness of reducing dioxin emissions from municipal solid waste incinerators in Japan. Environmental Science and Technology 35(14):2861–2866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JE (2004) Interstate shipment of municipal solid waste: 2004 update, CRS Report for Congress. Available from http://www.wastec.isproductions.net/webmodules/webarticles/articelfiles/430-CRS%2004%20waste%20Numbers.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministrial Conference on the 3R Initiative (2005) Available from http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/3r/en/index.html

  • Ministry of the Environment (2003) FY2000 report on study for control measures against regional transport of waste and study on status of recycled materials, Volume on study on status of recycled materials. Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • Ministry of the Environment (2005a) Municipal solid waste management in FY 2002 (Nippon no Haikibutsushori). Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • Ministry of the Environment (2005b) White paper on recycling-based society FY 2005 (Jyunkangata Shakai Hakusho). Gyosei, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • Nakanishi J (2004) Environmental risk assessment (Kankyo Risuku Gaku), Nippon-hyouron-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • NIRA (National Institute for Research Advancement) (2003) New form of self-governance as seen in waste management (Haikibutsu Mondai ni Miru Atarashii Jichi no Katachi): Public issues and participation. NIRA Seminar Report No. 2002-01 (in Japanese)

  • Onishi N (2005) How do the Japanese dump trash? Let us count the myriad ways, The New York Times 12 May, A1

  • Osaka Bay Regional Offshore Environmental Improvement Center. Available from http://www.osakawan-center.or.jp/

  • Policy Research Institute of Ministry of Finance (2002) International comparison of local government financing systems (Chihou Zaisei Sisutemu no Kokusai Hikaku) (in Japanese)

  • Taguchi M (2002) Sociological studies on the conflict of the waste: Case study on Chiba Prefecture. Ningen No Fukushi 11:159–182 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi H (2001) Examining regionalization of waste management, dioxin control and proximity principle, In: Yamanashi Gakuin University Public Administration Research Center (ed.) Aspects of regional public administration (Kouiki Gyousei no Shosou). Chuo Houki Shuppan, Tokyo (in Japanese), pp 53–92

  • Thomson VE, Okuda I (2005) Garbage in, garbage out: Virginia is for landfills. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC

  • Ueta K, Kitagawa S (2001) Handbook of waste management policies toward closed-loop society in Japan (Jyunkangata Shakai Handobukku). Yuhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • US Census Bureau (2005) Annual estimates of the population for the United States and the States, and of Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005. Available from http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Full cost accounting in action: Case studies of six solid waste management agencies. EPA530-R-98-018. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Municipal solid waste in the United States: 2003 data tables. Available from http://www.epa.gov/msw/msw99.htm (accessed 31 December 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Size of the economy. In: World development indicators. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 22–25

  • Yamamoto S (2001) Waste management regionalization plan (Gomishori Kouikika Keikaku). Tsukiji Shokan, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • Yorimoto K (2003) Road to recycling-based society (Risaikuru Shakai heno Michi). Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  • Yoshida F (2005) Case studies of environmental politics in Japan. In: H. Imura M. Schreurs (eds) Environmental policy in Japan. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 185–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itaru Okuda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okuda, I., Thomson, V.E. Regionalization of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Japan: Balancing the Proximity Principle with Economic Efficiency. Environmental Management 40, 12–19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0194-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0194-x

Keywords

Navigation