Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empowering Patients Through Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer Consultations

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Receiving a breast cancer diagnosis renders breast cancer consultations pivotal moments in a patient's journey, where decisions about treatment options, including breast reconstruction, can profoundly impact their physical and emotional well-being. Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative approach that involves healthcare professionals and patients working together to make decisions that align with the patient's values, preferences, and goals. SDM can hence lead to: 1. informed choices and patient empowerment; 2. enhanced patient satisfaction. One of the key decisions that patients face is whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction and the varying options available. However, while SDM has proven benefits, there still appears to be a lack of knowledge among some healthcare professionals. Hence, suggestions for mitigation include the employment of patient decision aids and clear communication strategies.

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Langbroek GB, Ronde EM, Lapid O et al (2023) Healthcare professionals’ views on shared decision-making in plastic surgery in the Netherlands. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 85:463–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Pace B, Marotta M, Serlenga G et al (2020) Breast cancer and reconstruction: it changes inside and out. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(2):391–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Pace B, Benson JR, Malata CM (2020) Breast reconstruction and the COVID-19 pandemic: A viewpoint. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(7):1357–1404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Pace B, Benson JR, Malata CM (2021) Breast reconstruction and the COVID-19 pandemic: adapting practice. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 74(3):644–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bojanic C, Di Pace B, Ghorra DT, Fopp LJ, Rabey NG, Malata CM (2023) A comparison of presentations and outcomes of salvage versus non-salvage abdominal free flap breast reconstructions-results of a 15-year tertiary referral centre review. PLoS ONE 18(11):e0288364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocco N, Montagna G, Di Micco R et al (2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical management of breast cancer: global trends and future perspectives. Oncologist 26(1):e66–e77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Pace B, Verdura V, Concilio M et al (2017) A rare case of squamous cell carcinoma of a proliferating trichilemmal tumour. Ann Ital Chir 88:263–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verdura V, Di Pace B, Concilio M et al (2019) A new case of radiation-induced breast angiosarcoma. Int J Surg Case Rep 60:152–155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Padley RH, Di Pace B (2021) Touch-ups, rejuvenation, re-dos and revisions: remote communication and cosmetic surgery on the rise. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(6):3078–3080

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Padley RH, Di Pace B (2022) The psychological impact of remote communication on body-image perception: cosmetic surgery on the rise. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(3):1507–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Pace B, Khan F, Patel M et al (2022) A multicentre study of the relationship between abdominal flap and mastectomy weights in immediate unilateral free flap breast reconstruction and the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75(1):61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guastafierro A, Verdura V, Di Pace B, Faenza M, Rubino C (2019) The influence of breast cancer on the distribution of cherry angiomas on the anterior thoracic wall: a case series study. Dermatology 235(1):65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Padley RH, Di Pace B (2021) Medical advances in telehealth and innovative communication: new directions. Gazz Med Ital 180(4):99–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Di Pace.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Partipants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Pace, B., Padley, R.H. Empowering Patients Through Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer Consultations. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03937-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03937-y

Keywords

Navigation