Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nerve Distribution Method is Superior to the Conventional Method in BoNT-A Treatment of Trapezius Hypertrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Original Articles
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contour of the neck and shoulder is defined by the trapezius muscle (TM). Beyond facial procedures, botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections has been increasingly adopted to create a smooth shoulder line. Several studies described the intramuscular nerve branching and the pattern of perforating branch of the accessory nerve in the trapezius muscle, providing essential information for botulinum neurotoxin injection. To this date, research groups seldom perform clinical investigations, especially randomized controlled trials, that demonstrates whether BoNT-A injections using the nerve distribution method for aesthetic purposes is more effective. Patients met the criteria for inclusion were randomized to either the Nerve Distribution group (ND group) or control group. Control group patients received injection using the conventional method while ND group patients received the nerve distribution method. Photographic and ultrasonographic evaluations were carried out at baseline, one month, three months, and six months after the procedure. Patients were also required to complete a questionnaire to evaluate their feedbacks to the injection. After screening, 30 healthy young Chinese women were included. At one-month follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two methods. At the three-month follow-up, the reduction of the TM thickness for the ND group (0.21 ± 0.09 cm) was more than that for the control group (0.27 ± 0.08 cm), with p = 0.047*. Similar differences were observed for the reduction of the shoulder area proportion (p = 0.031*) and the shoulder angle (p = 0.035*). At the six-month follow-up, the reduction in TM thickness in the ND group (0.2 ± 0.09 cm) was more than that of the control group (0.28 ± 0.06 cm), with p = 0.041*. The global aesthetic improvement scale feedbacks of the two methods showed no significant difference (3.4 ± 0.71 vs 3.8 ± 0.91, p = 0.207). The patients did not experience severe side effects. Compared to the conventional injection method, the nerve distribution method is more effective in reducing the trapezius muscle thickness, shoulder area proportion, and shoulder angle at three months, and shows longer lasting effects. The results of this study introduce unique insights into the design and tailoring of treatment protocols for shoulder-line contouring using BoNT-A.

Level of Evidence I This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yi KH et al (2021) Anatomical guide for botulinum neurotoxin injection: application to cosmetic shoulder contouring, pain syndromes, and cervical dystonia. Clin Anat 34(6):822–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohan EJ, Wirth GA (2014) Anatomy of the neck. Clin Plast Surg 41(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Meulemeester K et al (2017) Morphological and physiological differences in the upper trapezius muscle in patients with work-related trapezius myalgia compared to healthy controls: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 29:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen W et al (2021) Ultrasound-guided five-point injection of botulinum toxin for patients with trapezius hypertrophy. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou RR et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A injection in patients with bilateral trapezius hypertrophy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1664–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bae JH et al (2018) Accessory nerve distribution for aesthetic botulinum toxin injections into the upper trapezius muscle: anatomical study and clinical trial: reproducible BoNT injection sites for upper trapezius. Surg Radiol Anat 40(11):1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benitez PA (2022) Onabotulinumtoxin A for correcting trapezius muscle hypertrophy in Asian women. J Cosmet Dermatol 21(6):2677–2679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JH et al (2017) Botulinum toxin injection-site selection for a smooth shoulder line: an anatomical study. Biomed Res Int 2017:3092720

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gracies JM et al (2009) Botulinum toxin dilution and endplate targeting in spasticity: a double-blind controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(1):9-16.e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Campenhout A et al (2013) Botulinum toxin type A injections in the psoas muscle of children with cerebral palsy: muscle atrophy after motor end plate-targeted injections. Res Dev Disabil 34(3):1052–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L et al (2022) Ultrasonographic analysis of trapezius muscle for efficient botulinum toxin type A injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03191-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aoki KR (2003) Evidence for antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin type A in pain management. Headache 43(Suppl 1):S9-15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH et al (2014) Motor innervation of the trapezius muscle: Intraoperative motor conduction study during neck dissection. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 76(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yi KH et al (2023) Anatomical considerations for the injection of botulinum neurotoxin in shoulder and arm contouring. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z et al (2022) The visible muscles on ultrasound imaging make botulinum toxin injection more precise: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(1):406–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The work was supported by National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding, grant No. 2022-PUMCH-B-041, 2022-PUMCH-A-210 and 2022-PUMCH-A-025.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. LW, MZ, and TL performed the research. JH, NY and XL designed and improved the research study. YC and WZ contributed essential reagents or tools and analyzed the data. LW wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanze Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of our Institutional Ethical Committee.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Video of injection technique (MP4 4549 KB)

266_2023_3662_MOESM2_ESM.jpg

Ultrasonic images were taken at Point D. The upper segment of the yellow dotted line represented thickness of the subcutaneous tissue; lower segment represented thickness of the TM.(JPG 237 KB)

266_2023_3662_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Comparison of the reduction (from baseline) of the TM thickness of each point and the anterior border of the TM at each follow-up visit between the conventional and the nerve distribution method. NS stands for non-significant. The asterisk (“*”) stands for significant result based on 95% confident intervals. (DOCX 20 KB)

266_2023_3662_MOESM4_ESM.docx

Comparison of the ratio change (from baseline) of the TM thickness of each point and the anterior border of the TM at each follow-up visit between the conventional and the nerve distribution method. NS stands for non-significant. The asterisk (“*”) stands for significant result based on 95% confident intervals. (DOCX 20 KB)

266_2023_3662_MOESM5_ESM.docx

Comparison of the ratio change (from baseline) of the TM thickness, shoulder area proportions and shoulder angle at each follow-up visit between the conventional and the nerve distribution method. NS stands for non-significant. The asterisk (“*”) stands for significant result based on 95% confident intervals. (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Zhang, M., Li, T. et al. Nerve Distribution Method is Superior to the Conventional Method in BoNT-A Treatment of Trapezius Hypertrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 1210–1217 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03662-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03662-y

Keywords

Navigation