Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invited Discussion on: “Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: a Prospective Comparative Study”

  • Editor’s Invited Discussion
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Singamsetty R, Rout SK, Giri SK, Panda R, Behera KK, Sable MN (2021) Aesthetic outcome of gynecomastia management with conventional liposuction and cross chest liposuction–a prospective comparative study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02611-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Murali B, Vijayaraghavan S, Kishore P, Iyer S, Jimmy M, Sharma M, Paul G, Chavare S (2011) Cross-chest liposuction in gynaecomastia. Indian J Plast Surg 44(1):81–86. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.81451

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramon Y, Fodor L, Peled IJ, Eldor L, Egozi D, Ullmann Y (2005) Multimodality gynecomastia repair by cross-chest power-assisted superficial liposuction combined with endoscopic-assisted pull-through excision. Ann Plast Surg 55(6):591–594. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000189664.88464.34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walden JL, Schmid RP, Blackwell SJ (2004) Cross-chest lipoplasty and surgical excision for gynecomastia: a 10-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 24(3):216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2004.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prasetyono TOH, Budhipramono AG, Andromeda I (2021) Liposuction assisted gynecomastia surgery with minimal periareolar incision: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02520-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathy S, Likhyani A, Sharma R, Sharma RK (2020) Prospective analysis and comparison of periareolar excision (delivery) technique and pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(3):653–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01618-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zocchi ML, Vindigni V, Bassetto F (2020) 32 years of ultrasonic-assisted lipoplasty (U.A.L.): from aesthetic to obesity. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(4):1230–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01782-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong KJ, Malata CM (2014) Conventional versus ultrasound-assisted liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery: a 13-year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(7):921–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgson ELB, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2005) Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(2):646–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000173441.57812.e8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zocchi ML (1996) Ultrasonic assisted lipoplasty. Technical refinements and clinical evaluations. Clin Plast Surg 23:575–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zocchi ML (1999) Basic physics for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 26(2):209–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zocchi ML, Vindigni V, Pagani A, Pirro O, Conti G, Sbarbati A, Bassetto F (2019) Regulatory, ethical, and technical considerations on regenerative technologies and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Plast Surg 42:531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01571-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zocchi ML, Facchin F, Pagani A, Bonino C, Sbarbati A, Conti G, Vindigni V, Bassetto F (in press) New perspectives in regenerative medicine and surgery: the bioactive composite therapies (BACTs). Eur J Plast Surg, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01874-6

  15. Duscher D, Atashroo D, Maan ZN, Luan A, Brett EA, Barrera J et al (2016) Ultrasound-assisted liposuction does not compromise the regenerative potential of adipose-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 5:248–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Duscher D, Maan ZN, Luan A, Aitzetmller MM, Brett EA, Atashroo D, Whittam AJ, Hu MS, Walmsley GG, Houschyar KS, Schilling AF, Machens HG, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT, Wan DC (2017) Ultrasound-assisted liposuction provides a source for functional adipose-derived stromal cells. Cytotherapy 19(12):1491–1500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele L. Zocchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human or Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zocchi, M.L., Vindigni, V. Invited Discussion on: “Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: a Prospective Comparative Study”. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 1071–1074 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02669-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02669-7

Navigation