Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preauricular Aging: A Three-Point Grading System to Guide Treatment in Facial Rejuvenation

  • Original Article
  • Facial Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Aging affects the face in all its dimensions. However, more has been published about the improvement of the periocular, midface, and perioral aging changes. We believe the profile view, particularly the preauricular area, is of great value when assessing the need for facial contouring procedures, as well as their effectiveness.

Objective

To develop and evaluate a classification based on the aging changes around the preauricular area, which aims to provide an objective direction to the appropriate treatment method.

Methods and Materials

All patients who attended the clinic for different aesthetic procedures between June 2019 and January 2020 were photographed. Two non-treating dermatologists and two non-treating plastic surgeons were asked to evaluate the perceived aging of the preauricular area using a three-point grading system. The assessment of each photograph was made once by each evaluator, and the inter-rater correlation was calculated.

Results

A total of 158 profile pictures of the preauricular area of 158 patients were evaluated by two non-treating dermatologists and two non-treating plastic surgeons. The inter-rater correlation was excellent at 0.942. The mean grading system of the patient samples was 1.42, with a standard deviation of 0.9 and a variance of 0.001.

Conclusions

The preauricular area is often overlooked and undertreated. Our results demonstrate an excellent inter-rater correlation between plastic surgeons and dermatologists at assessing the degree of aging in the area. This relatively hidden lateral area can serve as a test point, evaluating response to selected treatment before proceeding to full-face intervention. We suggest using a simple three-point scale to help guide treatment of the preauricular area and as part of our holistic approach to facial rejuvenation.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pawlaczyk M et al (2013) Age-dependent biomechanical properties of the skin. Adv Dermatol Allergol. https://doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2013.38359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE (2007) The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000265403.66886.54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pessa J (2009) The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: anatomy and implications for surgical correction. Plast Reconst Surg 123(4):1332–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE, Ristow B (2008) The youthful cheek and the deep medial fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817123c6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glogau RG (1996) Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin. Semin Cutan Med Surg 15(3):134–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shoshani D, Markovitz E, Monstrey SJ, Narins DJ (2008) The modified fitzpatrick wrinkle scale: a clinically validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment. Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042728-200806001-00018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S (2004) The wrinkle severity rating scale: a validation study. Am J Clin Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200405010-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leal Silva HG (2016) Facial laxity rating scale validation study. Dermatol Surg 42(12):1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM (2001) A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(6):1735–1750. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD (1996) Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. Arch Dermatol 132(4):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1996.03890280047007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B, Kaur M et al (2008) A validated grading scale for forehead lines. Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34364.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hund T, Ascher B, Rzany B (2006) Reproducibility of two four-point clinical severity scores for lateral canthal lines (crow’s feet). Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32286.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pathak A, Mohan R, Rohrich R (2020) Chemical peels: role of chemical peels in facial rejuvenation today. Plast Recon Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Motosko C, Khouri K, Poudrier G, Sinno S, Hazen A (2018) Evaluating platelet-rich therapy for facial aesthetics and alopecia: a critical review of the literature. Plast Recon Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leo MS, Kumar AS, Kirit R, Konathan R, Sivamani RK (2015) Systematic review of the use of platelet-rich plasma in aesthetic dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Britt CJ, Marcus B (2017) Energy-based facial rejuvenation: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadick N, Rothaus KO (2016) Aesthetic applications of radiofrequency devices. Clin Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beasley KL, Weiss RA (2014) Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology. Dermatol Clin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2013.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinney BM, Andriessen A, DiBernardo BE, Bloom J, Branson DF, Gentile RD, Wu D (2017) Use of a controlled subdermal radio frequency thermistor for treating the aging neck: consensus recommendations. J Cosmet Laser Ther. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1343952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Locketz GD, Bloom JD (2019) Percutaneous radiofrequency lower face and neck tightening technique. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knight JM, Kautz G (2019) Sequential facial skin rejuvenation with intense pulsed light and nonablative fractionated laser resurfacing in fitzpatrick skin type II–IV patients: A prospective multicenter analysis. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall JA, Keller PJ, Keller GS (2004) Dose response of combination photorejuvenation using intense pulsed light-activated photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency energy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.6.374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fanous N, Zari S (2017) Universal trichloroacetic acid peel technique for light and dark skin. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Robati RM, Asadi E (2017) Efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser versus fractional Er:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles. Lasers Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2111-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen KH, Tam KW, Chen IF, Huang SK, Tzeng PC, Wang HJ (2017) Chen CC 2017 a systematic review of comparative studies of CO2 and erbium: YAG lasers in resurfacing facial rhytides. J Cosmet Laser Ther. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1288261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shin MK, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Kim NI (2012) Platelet-rich plasma combined with fractional laser therapy for skin rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02280.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexiades-Armenakas M, Rosenberg D, Renton B, Dover J, Arndt K (2010) Blinded, randomized, quantitative grading comparison of minimally invasive, fractional radiofrequency and surgical face-lift to treat skin laxity. Arch Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2010.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Haran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human or Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friedman, O., Artzi, O. & Haran, O. Preauricular Aging: A Three-Point Grading System to Guide Treatment in Facial Rejuvenation. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 2180–2187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02255-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02255-x

Keywords

Navigation