Skip to main content
Log in

Staying Out of Double-Bubble and Bottoming-Out Deformities in Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation: Anatomical and Clinical Study

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Double-bubble and bottoming-out deformities represent the second most common reason for revision surgery in breast augmentation. Etiopathogenesis of these complications is still unclear. The aim of this paper is to report our findings in breast cadaver dissections focusing on the inframammary fold (IMF) applied anatomy and to critically review our ten-year experience in breast augmentation.

Methods

A cadaveric study has been performed on four consecutive embalmed cadavers. A retrospective review of 207 consecutive women who underwent breast augmentation, using the submuscular dual-plane technique with a periareolar approach, between January 2003 and January 2013, was performed.

Results

According to our dissections, the IMF is a complex osseo-fascio-cutaneous structure in which the superficial pectoralis fascia represents a key structure in breast augmentation surgery. Hence, a critical analysis of the IMF relationship with surrounding breast structures helps to understand the etiology of double-bubble and bottoming-out deformities and gives the anatomical basis to prevent them. In our early clinical experience, we experienced 3% of double-bubble and 6% of bottoming-out deformities. Those complications were avoided later by dissection in the inferior pole according to the anatomical findings.

Conclusions

Bottoming-out and double-bubble deformities can be avoided if an anatomical approach is used during pocket dissection at the level of the IMF, paying attention to avoid disrupting the superficial and deep attachments of the superficial pectoralis fascia at the IMF. A comprehensive understanding of IMF anatomy and the key surgical maneuvers to avoid these complications must be taken into account for each route of dissection.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayati S, Seckel BR (1995) Inframammary crease ligament. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:501–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Handel N (2013) The double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1434–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matousek SA, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW (2014) Understanding the fascial supporting network of the breast: key ligamentous structures in breast augmentation and a proposed system of nomenclature. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):273–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lockwood TE (1991) Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1009–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556 (discussion 557)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boutros S, Kattash M, Wienfeld A, Yuksel E, Baer S, Shenaq S (1998) The intradermal anatomy of the inframammary fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1030–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Handel N, Jensen JA (1992) An improved technique for creation of the inframammary fold in silicone implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89(3):558–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: a new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(4):1034–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Tom Biggs, Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA, for his assistance in preparing this manuscript. The authors thank Prof. Paul M.N. Werker, Chief of Dept. of Plastic Surgery, and Mr Hepke Gjaltema, Mr Sip Zwerver, Wenckebach Institute, Skill Center, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, for their assistance, receptiveness and hospitality. The authors thank Antonia Conti, Medical Artist (an.conti@gmail.com), for the invaluable drawings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzia Salgarello.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salgarello, M., Visconti, G. Staying Out of Double-Bubble and Bottoming-Out Deformities in Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation: Anatomical and Clinical Study. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 999–1006 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0918-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0918-8

Keywords

Navigation