Skip to main content
Log in

Adverse Events of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Review
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is a medical product that is used widely in cosmetics, and concern over the safety profile has increased among injectors and patients.

Objective

The purpose was to enhance the statistical effect size using a meta-analysis to detect the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) in the treatment of facial wrinkles.

Methods

A systematic search was performed for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials published through July 2015.

Results

We searched 16 trials, including 42,405 individual participants, and found that in all enrolled facial rejuvenation studies, patients in the BTX-A group had significantly more AEs than those patients in the placebo group (RR = 1.24; 95 % CI 1.07–1.43; p = 0.003). For crow’s feet lines injection analysis, the BTX-A group did not exhibit any significant increase in AEs compared with the control group (RR = 1.19; 95 % CI 0.96–1.48; p = 0.12), except in injection site hematoma (RR = 2.14; 95 % CI 1.13–4.07; p = 0.02) in the treatment group. For frown wrinkle injection analysis, AEs were significantly observed in the BTX-A group (RR = 1.47; 95 % CI 1.23–1.77; p < 0.0001), particularly headaches (RR = 1.53; 95 % CI 1.15–2.03; p = 0.003), eyelid ptosis (RR = 5.56; 95 % CI 1.68–18.38; p = 0.005), and heavy eyelids (RR = 6.94; 95 % CI 1.27–37.93; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis confirmed the safety profile of BTX-A for glabellar and crow’s feet lines, and BTX-A usage for the removal of upper facial wrinkles, which have some significant mild-to-moderate adverse profiles, including headache, eye disorder, eyelid ptosis, and heavy eyelids. Facial injectors should abide by the technical standards of neurotoxic drugs and be familiar with the local pharmacological effects to lessen the severe side effects.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the A5 online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charles FJ, Cox SE, Earl ML (2003) Social implications of hyperfunctional facial lines. Dermatol Surg 29:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mac PS (2005) Self-esteem and cosmetic enhancement. Plast Surg Nurs 25:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leffell DJ, Arndt KA (2000) The dermatologic surgery issue: a new face for the ARCHIVES. Arch Dermatol 136:1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagien S (1999) Botox for the treatment of dynamic and hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows: adjunctive use in facial aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:701–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carruthers J, Carruthers A (2007) The evolution of botulinum neurotoxin type A for cosmetic applications. J Cosmet Laser Ther 9:186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotta TA (2014) ASAPS (American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery)–2013 annual statistics. Plast Surg Nurs 34:47–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fagien S, Cox SE, Finn JC, Werschler WP, Kowalski JW (2007) Patient-reported outcomes with botulinum toxin type A treatment of glabellar rhytids: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Dermatol Surg 33:S2–S9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glogau R, Kane M, Beddingfield F, Somogyi C, Lei X, Caulkins C et al (2012) OnabotulinumtoxinA: a meta-analysis of duration of effect in the treatment of glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 38:1794–1803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Boulle K (2008) Patient satisfaction with different botulinum toxin type A formulations in the treatment of moderate to severe upper facial rhytides. J Cosmet Laser Ther 10:87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carruthers JA, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, Nordquist M, Mordaunt J et al (2002) A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol 46:840–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses. Lancet 352:609–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC (2004) What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 23:1351–1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carruthers JD, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, Eadie N (2003) Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for patients with glabellar lines. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1089–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harii K, Kawashima M (2008) A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-dose comparative study of botulinum toxin type A for treating glabellar lines in Japanese subjects. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:724–730

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin MG, Dover J, Glogau RG, Goldberg DJ, Goldman MP, Schlessinger J (2009) The efficacy and safety of a new U.S. Botulinum toxin type A in the retreatment of glabellar lines following open-label treatment. J Drugs Dermatol 8:439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt F, Swanson N, Baumann L, Huber B (2009) Randomized, placebo-controlled study of a new botulinum toxin type a for treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy and safety. Dermatol Surg 35:1893–1901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Zhao G, Li H, Zheng Z, Zhong S, Yang Z et al (2010) Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar lines in Chinese: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Dermatol Surg 36:102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Coleman WP 3rd, Donofrio L, Flynn T, Gold M et al (2013) Multicenter, randomized, phase III study of a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA, free from complexing proteins, in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 39:551–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanke CW, Narins RS, Brandt F, Cohen JL, Donofrio LM, Downie J et al (2013) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 39:891–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moers-Carpi M, Carruthers J, Fagien S, Lupo M, Delmar H, Jones D et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for treating crow’s feet lines alone or in combination with glabellar lines: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 41:102–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowe NJ, Ascher B, Heckmann M, Kumar C, Fraczek S, Eadie N (2005) Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in subjects with crow’s feet. Dermatol Surg 31:257–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monheit G, Carruthers A, Brandt F, Rand R (2007) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar lines: determination of optimal dose. Dermatol Surg 33:S51–S59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kane MA, Brandt F, Rohrich RJ, Narins RS, Monheit GD, Huber MB (2009) Evaluation of variable-dose treatment with a new U.S. Botulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1619–1629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wollmer MA, de Boer C, Kalak N, Beck J, Gotz T, Schmidt T et al (2012) Facing depression with botulinum toxin: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res 46:574–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carruthers A, Bruce S, de Coninck A, Connolly S, Cox SE, Davis PG et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of crows feet lines: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 40:1181–1190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng Z, Sun Q, He L, Wu Y, Xie H, Zhao G et al (2015) Optimal dosage of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of glabellar frown lines: efficacy and safety in a clinical trial. Dermatol Surg 41:S56–S63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Almeida AT, Carruthers J, Cox SE, Goldman MP, Wheeler S, Gallagher CJ (2015) Patient satisfaction and safety with aesthetic onabotulinumtoxinA after at least 5 years: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 4402 glabellar treatments. Dermatol Surg 41:S19–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahn BK, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Rho NK, Kim HS (2013) Consensus recommendations on the aesthetic usage of botulinum toxin type A in Asians. Dermatol Surg 39:1843–1860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo Y, Lu Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Yang P, Zhu J et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 136:310e–318e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonaparte JP, Ellis D, Quinn JG, Ansari MT, Rabski J, Kilty SJ (2013) A comparative assessment of three formulations of botulinum toxin A for facial rhytides: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Syst Rev 2:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zagui RM, Matayoshi S, Moura FC (2008) Adverse effects associated with facial application of botulinum toxin: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:894–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ascher B, Zakine B, Kestemont P, Baspeyras M, Bougara A, Niforos F et al (2005) Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines: scheduling the next injection. Aesthet Surg J 25:365–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aguggia M (2008) Treating headaches with botulinum toxin. Neurol Sci 29(Suppl 1):S137–S139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brin MF, Boodhoo TI, Pogoda JM, James LM, Demos G, Terashima Y et al (2009) Safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of facial lines: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from global clinical registration studies in 1678 participants. J Am Acad Dermatol 61:961–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ascher B, Rzany BJ, Grover R (2009) Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lateral crow’s feet: double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Dermatol Surg 35:1478–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rzany B, Dill-Muller D, Grablowitz D, Heckmann M, Caird D (2007) Repeated botulinum toxin A injections for the treatment of lines in the upper face: a retrospective study of 4103 treatments in 945 patients. Dermatol Surg 33:S18–S25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brin MF, Blitzer A (1993) Botulinum toxin: dangerous terminology errors. J R Soc Med 86:493–494

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Harper L (2009) Botulinum toxin A-when is a unit not a unit? J Urol 181:414–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Guodong Song PhD, DDS, for his thoughtful review of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuoliang Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

Additional information

Zhenhua Jia and Haibin Lu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, Z., Lu, H., Yang, X. et al. Adverse Events of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 40, 769–777 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0682-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0682-1

Keywords

Navigation