Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tuberous Breast: Revised Classification and a New Hypothesis for its Development

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tuberous breast classification proposed by Grolleau does not account for a minor form of the deformity characterized by isolated nipple–areola protrusion with a normal breast base. We have observed this minor form in six patients with normal breast shape and in ten patients with hypertrophic breasts. We propose an anatomical and physiological hypothesis for the development of the mammary gland. The breast is subjected to hormonal influences as early as the prepubertal period. These influences result in thrusting forces with both horizontal (estrogen) and vertical (progesterone) vectors, unfortunately not always balanced and harmonious. Close observation of the anomaly in our patients substantiated the basic anatomical defect, namely, the structural congenital dermal weakness of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) already described in all forms of tuberous breast deformity. This weakness explains the morphologic anomaly and confirms that all types of tuberous breast deformity constitute a spectrum of a single entity. It indicates also that the classification of tuberous breasts should include, in addition to the three types (types I–III) already described, a fourth type (type 0) to describe isolated simple areola protrusion, either permanent or intermittent, that is associated with a normal mammary base. The revised classification of tuberous breasts and the proposed hypothesis of breast development allow better assessment of all possible variants of breast morphologic anomalies. In the six cases of isolated herniated NAC, the deformity was corrected through a perinipple approach (not circumareolar), with adequate stable correction of the deformity and minimal scarring.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toranto IR (1981) Two stages correction of tuberous breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:642–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Versaci AD, Rozelle AA (1991) Treatment of tuberous breast utilising tissue expansion. Aesthet Plast Surg 15:307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Persichetti P, Berroco M, Casadei RM, Marangi GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM (2001) Gynecomastia and the complex circumareolar approach in the surgical treatment of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:948–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gruber RP, Jines HW Jr (1980) The donut mastopexy; indications and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas D et al (2003) Aesthetic reconstruction of the tuberous breast deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1099–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandrekas AD, George J, Zambacos GJ (2010) Aesthetic reconstruction of the tuberous breast deformity a 10-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 30:680–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rees TD, Aston SJ (1976) The tuberous breast. Clin Plast Surg 3:339–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pacifico MD, Kang NV (2007) The tuberous breast revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:455–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinner MI, Dowden RV (1987) The tubular/tuberous breast syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 19:414–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bach AD, Kneser U, Beier JP, Breuel C et al (2009) Aesthetic correction of tuberous breast deformity. Lessons learned with a single-stage procedure. Breast J 15:279–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliot MP (1988) A muscular cutaneous transposition flap for correction of tubular breast. Ann Plast Surg 20:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panchapakesan V, Brown MH (2009) Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bass CB (1978) Herniated areolar complex. Ann Plast Surg 1:402–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Topper YJ, Freeman CS (1980) Multiple hormone interactions in the developmental biology of the mammary gland. Physiol Rev 60:1049–1106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams JF (1981) Two stages correction of tuberous breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M (1999) Breast base anomalies. Treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2040–2048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Von Heimburg D, Exner K, Kruft S, Lemperle G (1996) The tuberous breast deformity. Classification and treatment. Br J Plast Surg 49:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zambacos GJ, Mandrekas AD (2006) The incidence of tuberous breast deformity in asymmetric and symmetric mammaplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanner JM (1962) Growth at adolescence, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bostwick III J (2000) Anatomy and physiology. In: Plastic breast surgery, 2nd edn. Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis

  21. Ribeiro L, Canzi W, Buss A, Accorsi A Jr (1998) Tuberous breast: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynaud JP, Gary-Bobo A, Baron JL, Bousquet P, Dessus B (1990) Tuberous breast: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Report of 20 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 35(6):453–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Argencio V (2005) Tuberous breast: a periareolar approach. Aesthet Surg J 25:398–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Klinger MK, Caviggioli F, Klinger F, Villani F et al (2011) Tuberous breast: morphological study and overview of a borderline entity. Can J Plast Surg 19:42–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoehn JG, Georgiade G (1996) Congenital and development deformities of the breast and breast deformities. In: Plastic, maxillofacial and reconstructive surgery, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, London

  26. Lalardrie JP, Jouglard JP (1974) Chirurgie Plastique du sein. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  27. Topper YJ (1970) Multiple hormone interactions in the development of mammary gland in vitro. Recent Prog Horm Res 26:287–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Atiyeh BS, Hashim HA, El-Douauhy Y, Kayle DI (1998) Perinipple round block technique for correction of tubular/tuberous breast deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:284–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sohet C, Heymans O (2007) Tissular expansion and tuberous breasts: 10 cases report. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 52:187–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Foustanos A, Zavrides H (2006) Surgical reconstruction of tuberous breasts. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gallegos ML, Casas LA (1998) A systematic, one-stage approach in the treatment of tuberous breast deformity. Aesthet Surg J 18:431–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Muti E (1996) Personal approach to surgical correction of the extremely hypoplastic tuberous breast. Aesthet Plast Surg 20:385–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nahabedian MY (2011) Breast deformities and mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:91e–102e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any commercial interest in the subject of study nor did they have any financial or material support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France

    Michel Costagliola

  2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Bishara Atiyeh

  3. Clinique des Universités, Dijon University, Dijon, France

    Florence Rampillon

Authors
  1. Michel Costagliola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bishara Atiyeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florence Rampillon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bishara Atiyeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costagliola, M., Atiyeh, B. & Rampillon, F. Tuberous Breast: Revised Classification and a New Hypothesis for its Development. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 896–903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0124-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0124-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation