Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High-Risk for Breast Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is little consensus regarding the indications, ideal incision, or reconstruction method for prophylactic mastectomy. In addition, the biggest limitation in studies that assess either patient satisfaction or operation results is the lack of group homogeneity.

Methods

In our center, 21 bilateral prophylactic mastectomies, due to breasts at high risk for cancer, and simultaneous breast reconstruction using submuscular medium-height high-profile silicone implants were performed between 2008 and 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: small-breasted (9 patients) and large/ptotic-breasted (12 patients). A periareolar incision was used in the 9 patients and a vertical mastopexy incision was used in the 12 patients who needed nipple–areola complex repositioning.

Results

The rates of general satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes, assessed using the Michigan Breast Satisfaction Questionnaire, were 100 and 90.4 %, respectively. Seroma occurred in three patients and venous congestion of the nipple–areola complex developed in four patients, which resolved spontaneously. No nipple–areola necrosis, implant exposition, or capsule contractures were encountered. Only three patients underwent fat injection for contour restoration.

Conclusion

We obtained very good aesthetic results with low complication rates using this technique in a homogeneous group of patients.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR et al (2008) Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer 15(3):185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spear SL, Carter ME, Schwarz K (2005) Prophylactic mastectomy: indications, options, and reconstructive alternatives. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(3):891–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldor L, Spiegel A (2009) Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast J 15:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spear SL, Schwarz KA, Venturi ML et al (2008) Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Isern AE, Tengrup I, Loman N et al (2008) Aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life in women at high risk undergoing prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(10):1177–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR et al (2006) Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(6):1675–1682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC et al (2000) Determinants of breast satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):769–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A et al (2010) Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF (2012) Prophylactic mastectomy: is it worth it? Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(1):140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Josephson U, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2000) Initial experiences of women from hereditary breast cancer families after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(4):351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A et al (2010) Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(2):332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geiger AM, Nekhlyudov L, Herrinton LJ et al (2007) Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2):686–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr et al (2002) Nipple–areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED et al (2011) Nipple–sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1005–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM et al (2011) Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3102–3109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yiacoumettis AM (2005) Two staged breast reconstruction following prophylactic bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. Br J Plast Surg 58(3):299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A et al (2006) Nipple–sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203:704–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woods JE (1983) Subcutaneous mastectomy: current state of the art. Plast Reconstr Surg 11:541–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Malata CM, Hodgson EL, Chikwe J et al (2003) An application of the LeJour vertical mammaplasty pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy: A preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 51(4):345–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colwell AS, Gadd M, Smith BL et al (2010) An inferolateral approach to nipple–sparing mastectomy optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 65(2):140–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rovere GQ, Nava M, Bonomi R et al (2008) Skin-reducing mastectomy with breast reconstruction and sub-pectoral implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(11):1303–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayram Y, Kulahci Y, Irgil C et al (2010) Skin-reducing subcutaneous mastectomy using a dermal barrier flap and immediate breast reconstruction with an implant: a new surgical design for reconstruction of early-stage breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(1):71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rivolin A, Kubatzki F, Marocco F et al (2012) Nipple–areola complex sparing mastectomy with periareolar pexy for breast cancer patients with moderately ptotic breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(3):296–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ (2008) Technical considerations in nipple–sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1341–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B et al (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1170–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wickman M, Sandelin K, Arver B (2003) Technical aspects and outcome after prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in 30 consecutive high-risk patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1069–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hankins CL, Friedman J (2008) A 7 year experience in utilizing the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 60(2):134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Werdin F, Peek A, Martin NC et al (2010) Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(1):17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Landuyt K et al (2004) Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center’s experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P et al (2008) Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years’ experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(11):1309–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest or any financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Sahin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahin, I., Isik, S., Alhan, D. et al. One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High-Risk for Breast Cancer. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 303–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6

Keywords

Navigation