Abstract
Background
There is little consensus regarding the indications, ideal incision, or reconstruction method for prophylactic mastectomy. In addition, the biggest limitation in studies that assess either patient satisfaction or operation results is the lack of group homogeneity.
Methods
In our center, 21 bilateral prophylactic mastectomies, due to breasts at high risk for cancer, and simultaneous breast reconstruction using submuscular medium-height high-profile silicone implants were performed between 2008 and 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: small-breasted (9 patients) and large/ptotic-breasted (12 patients). A periareolar incision was used in the 9 patients and a vertical mastopexy incision was used in the 12 patients who needed nipple–areola complex repositioning.
Results
The rates of general satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes, assessed using the Michigan Breast Satisfaction Questionnaire, were 100 and 90.4 %, respectively. Seroma occurred in three patients and venous congestion of the nipple–areola complex developed in four patients, which resolved spontaneously. No nipple–areola necrosis, implant exposition, or capsule contractures were encountered. Only three patients underwent fat injection for contour restoration.
Conclusion
We obtained very good aesthetic results with low complication rates using this technique in a homogeneous group of patients.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR et al (2008) Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer 15(3):185–191
Spear SL, Carter ME, Schwarz K (2005) Prophylactic mastectomy: indications, options, and reconstructive alternatives. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(3):891–909
Eldor L, Spiegel A (2009) Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast J 15:81–89
Spear SL, Schwarz KA, Venturi ML et al (2008) Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(1):1–9
Isern AE, Tengrup I, Loman N et al (2008) Aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life in women at high risk undergoing prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(10):1177–1187
Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR et al (2006) Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(6):1675–1682
Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203
Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC et al (2000) Determinants of breast satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):769–776
Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A et al (2010) Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(1):1–9
de la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF (2012) Prophylactic mastectomy: is it worth it? Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(1):140–148
Josephson U, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2000) Initial experiences of women from hereditary breast cancer families after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(4):351–356
Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A et al (2010) Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(2):332–338
Geiger AM, Nekhlyudov L, Herrinton LJ et al (2007) Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2):686–694
Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr et al (2002) Nipple–areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):457–463
Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED et al (2011) Nipple–sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1005–1014
Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM et al (2011) Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3102–3109
Yiacoumettis AM (2005) Two staged breast reconstruction following prophylactic bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. Br J Plast Surg 58(3):299–305
Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A et al (2006) Nipple–sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203:704–714
Woods JE (1983) Subcutaneous mastectomy: current state of the art. Plast Reconstr Surg 11:541–550
Malata CM, Hodgson EL, Chikwe J et al (2003) An application of the LeJour vertical mammaplasty pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy: A preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 51(4):345–350
Colwell AS, Gadd M, Smith BL et al (2010) An inferolateral approach to nipple–sparing mastectomy optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 65(2):140–143
Rovere GQ, Nava M, Bonomi R et al (2008) Skin-reducing mastectomy with breast reconstruction and sub-pectoral implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(11):1303–1308
Bayram Y, Kulahci Y, Irgil C et al (2010) Skin-reducing subcutaneous mastectomy using a dermal barrier flap and immediate breast reconstruction with an implant: a new surgical design for reconstruction of early-stage breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(1):71–77
Rivolin A, Kubatzki F, Marocco F et al (2012) Nipple–areola complex sparing mastectomy with periareolar pexy for breast cancer patients with moderately ptotic breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(3):296–303
Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ (2008) Technical considerations in nipple–sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1341–1347
Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B et al (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1170–1178
Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41
Wickman M, Sandelin K, Arver B (2003) Technical aspects and outcome after prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in 30 consecutive high-risk patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1069–1077
Hankins CL, Friedman J (2008) A 7 year experience in utilizing the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 60(2):134–140
Werdin F, Peek A, Martin NC et al (2010) Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(1):17–21
Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Landuyt K et al (2004) Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center’s experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):83–89
Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P et al (2008) Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years’ experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(11):1309–1315
Disclosures
The authors have no conflicts of interest or any financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahin, I., Isik, S., Alhan, D. et al. One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High-Risk for Breast Cancer. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 303–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6