Abstract
In the current study, skin flaps raised in the subcutaneous plane were applied for 22 patients who underwent reconstruction for unilateral upper facial skin defects after skin tumor surgery. The defect was reconstructed with flaps designed via procedures similar to classic rhytidectomy techniques using periauricular and temporal skin incisions. Objective assessment of the aesthetic result was possible by comparison with the healthy contralateral side of the face. Immediate postoperative evaluation confirmed facial asymmetry due to unilateral skin tension. High patient acceptance of the procedure, uneventful flap healing, and good aesthetic results were achieved, with almost complete restoration of facial symmetry 1 year postoperatively. In conclusion, unilateral rhytidectomy without plication or resection of the subcutaneous musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is an ideal application of aesthetic surgical techniques for the reconstruction of unilateral skin defects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kalus R, Zamora S (1992) Aesthetic considerations in facial reconstructive surgery: A plastic surgical perspective. J S C Med Assoc 88:11–16
Adamson PA, Litner JA (2005) Evolution of rhytidectomy techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 13:383–391
Wang TD (1989) Rhytidectomy for treatment of the aging face. Mayo Clin Proc 64:780–790
Kamer FM, Frankel AS (1998) SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: An objective comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:878–881
Noone RB (2006) Suture suspension malarplasty with SMAS plication and modified SMASectomy: A simplified approach to midface lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:792–803
Besins T (2004) The “R.A.R.E.” technique (reverse and repositioning effect): The renaissance of the aging face and neck. Aesth Plast Surg 28:127–142
Cornette de Saint Cyr B, Maillard GF, Scheflan M, Ramirez O (1993) The subperiosteal lift. Aesth Plast Surg 17:151–155
Ramirez OM, Maillard GF, Musolas A (1991) The extended subperiosteal face lift: A definitive soft tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:227–236
Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ (1996) Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:1135–1143
Mitz V, Peyronie M (1976) The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:80–88
Hamra ST (1990) The deep plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:53–61
Hamra ST (1992) Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:1–13
Wettstein R, Kalbermatten DF, Rieger UM, et al. (2006) Laser surface scanning analysis in reconstructive rhytidectomy. Aesth Plast Surg 30:637–640
Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, et al. (1992) Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery 112:293–297
Becker FF, Castellano RD (2004) Safety of face-lifts in the older patient. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:311–314
Friedman O (2005) Changes associated with the aging face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 13:371–380
Montagna W, Carlisle K (1990) Structural changes in ageing skin. Br J Dermatol 122(Suppl 35):61–70
de Castro CC (1986) The role of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system in face-lift. Ann Plast Surg 16:279–286
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Stefan de Maddalena, University of Basel, for photographic work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalbermatten, D.F., Erba, P., Wettstein, R. et al. Hemiface Rhytidectomy. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 227–233 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9003-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9003-z