Abstract
Reproductive interference can seriously affect the reproductive success of involved individuals and may lead to local exclusion of the competitively inferior species. The components of male competitiveness in direct bodily fights for females have been studied rarely in a heterospecific context. In explosively breeding anuran amphibians, males are often coercive and indiscriminate, which frequently leads to interactions among heterospecific males. We experimentally assessed the competitiveness of male Rana dalmatina (RD) and R. temporaria (RT), two species with overlapping breeding both in time and space. The mating speed of the RD males decreased over the course of the breeding season, whereas RT males retained their swiftness. In addition, the RD males were rarely able to replace the RT males from amplexus with RD females, while takeovers frequently occurred among the RD males. Further, larger RD males were more successful in maintaining amplexus and in achieving takeovers when facing smaller conspecifics. Our results suggest that male body size is important for intraspecific competition among the RD males, but the RT males outcompete the RD males of all sizes, perhaps due to their larger body size. Hence, RT males are likely to be effective satyrs of RD females, because they may lower the reproductive success of the latter. Such interspecific differences in the competitiveness of males may represent an important mechanism that contributes to the arousal of asymmetric reproductive interference between species.
Significance statement
Reproductive interference—interactions between species during mating with negative consequences on the fitness of involved individuals—is widespread in nature. Even though differences in the competitiveness of males of interfering species may have severe consequences, competitiveness of males has rarely been studied in an interspecific scenario in vertebrates. Males of anuran amphibians are often indiscriminate and coercive and engage in bodily fights for the possession of both conspecific and heterospecific females, which may often compromise the reproductive success of involved males and females. Here, we demonstrate that interspecific differences among ranid males can be large in the swiftness of pair formation, in the ability to defend the mating position and to perform takeovers. These differences are likely to lower the reproductive performance of the competitively inferior species, potentially leading to its local extinction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt G, Reyer H-U (1993) Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:221–228
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New York
Bath E, Tatarnic N, Bonduriansky R (2012) Asymmetric reproductive isolation and interference in neriid flies: the roles of genital morphology and behaviour. Anim Behav 84:1331–1339
Belanger RM, Corkum LD (2009) Review of aquatic sex pheromones and chemical communication in anurans. J Herpetol 43:184–191
Bergen K, Semlitsch RD, Reyer H-U (1997) Hybrid female matings are directly related to the availability of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta males in experimental populations. Copeia 1997:275–283
Bourne GR (1993) Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra. Anim Behav 45:1051–1059
Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav Ecol 15:872–882
Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49:1345–1365
D’Orgeix CA, Turner BJ (1995) Multiple paternity in the red-eyed treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas (Cope). Mol Ecol 4:505–508
Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683–685
Davies NB, Halliday TR (1979) Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo. Anim Behav 27:1253–1267
Dely OG (1967) Kétéltûek – Amphibia. – Magyarország Állatvilága (Fauna Hungariae) 83:1–80
Elmberg J (1986) Apparent lack of territoriality during the breeding season in a boreal population of common frogs Rana temporaria. Herpetol J 1:81–85
Elmberg J (1990) Long-term survival, length of breeding season, and operational sex ratio in a boreal population of common frogs, Rana temporaria L. Can J Zool 68:121–127
Elmberg J (1991) Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:125–131
Engeler B, Reyer H-U (2001) Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta). Behav Ecol 12:600–606
Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971
Escoriza D, Boix D (2014) Reproductive habitat selection in alien and native populations of the genus Discoglossus. Acta Oecol 59:97–103
Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2005) Interspecific social interactions and breeding success of the frog Rana latastei: a field study. Ethology 111:764–774
Gibbons MM, McCarthy TK (1986) The reproductive output of frogs Rana temporaria (L.) with particular reference to body size and age. J Zool 209:579–593
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Gottsberger B, Gruber E (2004) Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J Trop Ecol 20:271–280
Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Green DM, Borkin LJ (1993) Evolutionary relationships of Eastern Palearctic Brown Frogs, genus Rana: paraphyly of the 24-chromosome species group and the significance of chromosome number change. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 109:1–25
Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282
Gröning J, Lücke N, Finger A, Hochkirch A (2007) Reproductive interference in two ground-hopper species: testing hypotheses of coexistence in the field. Oikos 116:1449–1460
Hettyey A, Pearman PB (2003) Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei. Behav Ecol 14:294–300
Hettyey A, Török J, Kovács T (2003) Breeding biology and habitat use of seven amphibian species in a hilly woodland (Pilis Mountains, Hungary). Állattani Közlemények 88:41–55
Hettyey A, Török J, Hévizi G (2005) Male mate choice lacking in the agile frog, Rana dalmatina. Copeia 2005:403–408
Hettyey A, Baksay S, Vági B, Hoi H (2009a) Counterstrategies by female frogs to sexual coercion by heterospecific. Anim Behav 78:1365–1372
Hettyey A, Vági B, Hévizi G, Török J (2009b) Changes in sperm stores, ejaculate size, fertilization success, and sexual motivation over repeated matings in the common toad, Bufo bufo (Anura: Bufonidae). Biol J Linn Soc 96:361–371
Hettyey A, Vági B, Kovács T, Ujszegi J, Katona P, Szederkényi M, Pearman PB, Griggio M, Hoi H (2014) Reproductive interference between Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria affects reproductive success in natural populations. Oecologia 176:457–464
Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76:633–642
Hödl W (1977) Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia 28:351–363
Höglund J (1989) Pairing and spawning patterns in the common toad, Bufo bufo: the effects of sex ratios and the time available for male-male competition. Anim Behav 38:423–429
Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1988) Chorusing behaviour, a density-dependent alternative mating strategy in male common toads (Bufo bufo). Ethology 79:324–332
Höglund J, Säterberg L (1989) Sexual selection in common toads: correlates with age and body size. J Evol Biol 2:367–372
Howard RD, Kluge AG (1985) Proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in wood frogs. Evolution 32:260–277
Jennions MD, Passmore NI (1993) Sperm competition in frogs: testis size and a ‘sterile male’ experiment on Chiromantis xerampeltina (Rhacophoridae). Biol J Linn Soc 50:211–220
Kandul NP, Wright KM, Kandul EV, Noor MA (2006) No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura. BMC Evol Biol 6:54
Kishi S, Nishida T, Tsubaki Y (2009) Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. J Anim Ecol 78:1043–1049
Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34:275–284
Kyogoku D, Nishida T (2012) The presence of heterospecific males causes an Allee-effect. Popul Ecol 54:391–395
Lee JC (1986) Is large-male mating advantage in anurans an epiphenomenon? Oecologia 69:207–212
Lengagne T, Grolet O, Joly P (2006) Male mating speed promote hybridization in the Rana lessonae–Rana esculenta waterfrog system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:123–130
Lengagne T, Plenet S, Joly P (2008) Breeding behaviour and hybridization: variation in male chorusing behaviour promotes mating among taxa in waterfrogs. Anim Behav 75:443–450
Lesbarrères D, Lodé T (2002) Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. Ethol Ecol Evol 14:287–295
Liao WB, Lu X (2012) Variation in mating patterns of the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi along an elevational gradient in southwestern China. Ethol Ecol Evol 24:174–186
Licht LE (1969) Comparative breeding behavior of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora aurora) and the western spotted frog (Rana pretiosa pretiosa) in southwestern British Columbia. Can J Zool 47:1287–1299
Lodé T, Lesbarrères D (2004) Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran. Naturwissenschaften 91:44–47
Lodé T, Holveck M-J, Lesbarrères D, Pagano A (2004) Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S399–S401
Lodé T, Holveck M-J, Lesbarrères D (2005) Asynchronous arrival pattern, operational sex ratio and occurrence of multiple paternities in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina. Biol J Linn Soc 86:191–200
Loman J, Madsen T (1986) Reproductive tactics of large and small male toads Bufo bufo. Oikos 46:57–61
McLain KD, Shure DJ (1987) Pseudocompetition: interspecific displacement of insect species through misdirected courtship. Oikos 49:291–296
Michalak P, Rafinski J (1999) Sexual isolation between two newt species, Triturus vulgaris and T. montandoni (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae). Biol J Linn Soc 67:343–352
Nöllert A, Nöllert C (1992) Die Amphibien Europas. Bestimmung-Gefährdung-Schutz. Franckh-Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart
Noriyuki S, Osawa N, Nishida T (2012) Asymmetric reproductive interference between specialist and generalist predatory ladybirds. J Anim Ecol 81:1077–1085
Pfennig KS (2007) Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 318:965–967
Preininger D, Boeckle M, Freudmann A, Starnberger I, Sztatecsny M, Hödl W (2013) Multimodal signalling in the small torrent frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1449–1456
Puky M, Schád P, Szövényi G (2005) Herpetological atlas of Hungary. Varangy Akciócsoport Egyesület, Budapest
Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501
Rausch AM, Sztatecsny M, Jehle R, Ringler E, Hödl W (2014) Male body size and parental relatedness but not nuptial colouration influence paternity success during scramble competition in Rana arvalis. Behaviour 151:1869–1884
Reading CJ (1984) Interspecific spawning between common frogs (Rana temporaria) and common toads (Bufo bufo). J Zool 203:95–101
Reading CJ (1998) The effect of winter temperatures on the timing of breeding activity in the common toad Bufo bufo. Oecologia 117:469–475
Reyer H-U, Frei G, Som C (1999) Cryptic female choice: frogs reduce clutch size when amplexed by undesired males. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2101–2107
Rhymer JM, Simberloff DS (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–109
Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128:513–528
Roberts JD, Standish RJ, Byrne PG, Doughty P (1999) Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Anim Behav 57:721–726
Ryser J (1989) The breeding migration and mating system of a Swiss population of the common frog Rana temporaria. Amphibia-Reptilia 10:13–21
Skelly DK, Kiesecker JM (2001) Venue and outcome in ecological experiments: manipulation of larval anurans. Oikos 94:198–208
Starnberger I, Preininger D, Hödl W (2014) The anuran vocal sac: a tool for multimodal signalling. Anim Behav 97:281–288
Sztatecsny M, Jehle R, Burke T, Hödl W (2006) Female polyandry under male harassment: the case of the common toad (Bufo bufo). J Zool 270:517–522
Sztatecsny M, Preininger D, Freudmann A, Loretto M-C, Maier F, Hödl W (2012) Don’t get the blues: couspicuous nuptial colouration of male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) supports visual mate recognition during scramble competition in large breeding aggregations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1587–1593
Vági B, Kovács T, Băncilă R, Hartel T, Anthony BP (2013) A landscape-level study on the breeding site characteristics of ten amphibian species in Central Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 34:63–73
Vences M, Hauswaldt JS, Steinfartz S et al (2013) Radically different phylogeographies and patterns of genetic variation in two European brown frogs, genus Rana. Mol Phylogenet Evol 68:657–670
Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693
Wirtz P (1999) Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58:1–12
Acknowledgments
We thank Sandra Baksay, Szilvia Héja, Krisztina Vincze, Péter Turai, and Márk Szederkényi for their help in the field; János Török, Herbert Hoi, and Dustin J. Penn for their continuing support; and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. The Közép-Duna-Völgyi Környezetvédelmi, Természetvédelmi és Vízügyi Felügyelőség issued the permit (Permission No. 13369-2/2008) to conduct the experiments. We would also like to thank the Pilisi Parkerdő Zrt. for allowing us to use their roads.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This research was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, F-61374), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, P19264), and the “Lendület” program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Communicated by K. Summers
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vági, B., Hettyey, A. Intraspecific and interspecific competition for mates: Rana temporaria males are effective satyrs of Rana dalmatina females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1477–1484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2156-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2156-5