Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific and interspecific competition for mates: Rana temporaria males are effective satyrs of Rana dalmatina females

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reproductive interference can seriously affect the reproductive success of involved individuals and may lead to local exclusion of the competitively inferior species. The components of male competitiveness in direct bodily fights for females have been studied rarely in a heterospecific context. In explosively breeding anuran amphibians, males are often coercive and indiscriminate, which frequently leads to interactions among heterospecific males. We experimentally assessed the competitiveness of male Rana dalmatina (RD) and R. temporaria (RT), two species with overlapping breeding both in time and space. The mating speed of the RD males decreased over the course of the breeding season, whereas RT males retained their swiftness. In addition, the RD males were rarely able to replace the RT males from amplexus with RD females, while takeovers frequently occurred among the RD males. Further, larger RD males were more successful in maintaining amplexus and in achieving takeovers when facing smaller conspecifics. Our results suggest that male body size is important for intraspecific competition among the RD males, but the RT males outcompete the RD males of all sizes, perhaps due to their larger body size. Hence, RT males are likely to be effective satyrs of RD females, because they may lower the reproductive success of the latter. Such interspecific differences in the competitiveness of males may represent an important mechanism that contributes to the arousal of asymmetric reproductive interference between species.

Significance statement

Reproductive interference—interactions between species during mating with negative consequences on the fitness of involved individuals—is widespread in nature. Even though differences in the competitiveness of males of interfering species may have severe consequences, competitiveness of males has rarely been studied in an interspecific scenario in vertebrates. Males of anuran amphibians are often indiscriminate and coercive and engage in bodily fights for the possession of both conspecific and heterospecific females, which may often compromise the reproductive success of involved males and females. Here, we demonstrate that interspecific differences among ranid males can be large in the swiftness of pair formation, in the ability to defend the mating position and to perform takeovers. These differences are likely to lower the reproductive performance of the competitively inferior species, potentially leading to its local extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt G, Reyer H-U (1993) Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath E, Tatarnic N, Bonduriansky R (2012) Asymmetric reproductive isolation and interference in neriid flies: the roles of genital morphology and behaviour. Anim Behav 84:1331–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger RM, Corkum LD (2009) Review of aquatic sex pheromones and chemical communication in anurans. J Herpetol 43:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen K, Semlitsch RD, Reyer H-U (1997) Hybrid female matings are directly related to the availability of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta males in experimental populations. Copeia 1997:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne GR (1993) Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra. Anim Behav 45:1051–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav Ecol 15:872–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49:1345–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Orgeix CA, Turner BJ (1995) Multiple paternity in the red-eyed treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas (Cope). Mol Ecol 4:505–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Halliday TR (1979) Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo. Anim Behav 27:1253–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dely OG (1967) Kétéltûek – Amphibia. – Magyarország Állatvilága (Fauna Hungariae) 83:1–80

  • Elmberg J (1986) Apparent lack of territoriality during the breeding season in a boreal population of common frogs Rana temporaria. Herpetol J 1:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmberg J (1990) Long-term survival, length of breeding season, and operational sex ratio in a boreal population of common frogs, Rana temporaria L. Can J Zool 68:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmberg J (1991) Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeler B, Reyer H-U (2001) Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta). Behav Ecol 12:600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escoriza D, Boix D (2014) Reproductive habitat selection in alien and native populations of the genus Discoglossus. Acta Oecol 59:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2005) Interspecific social interactions and breeding success of the frog Rana latastei: a field study. Ethology 111:764–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons MM, McCarthy TK (1986) The reproductive output of frogs Rana temporaria (L.) with particular reference to body size and age. J Zool 209:579–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger B, Gruber E (2004) Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J Trop Ecol 20:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Borkin LJ (1993) Evolutionary relationships of Eastern Palearctic Brown Frogs, genus Rana: paraphyly of the 24-chromosome species group and the significance of chromosome number change. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 109:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gröning J, Lücke N, Finger A, Hochkirch A (2007) Reproductive interference in two ground-hopper species: testing hypotheses of coexistence in the field. Oikos 116:1449–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Pearman PB (2003) Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei. Behav Ecol 14:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Török J, Kovács T (2003) Breeding biology and habitat use of seven amphibian species in a hilly woodland (Pilis Mountains, Hungary). Állattani Közlemények 88:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Török J, Hévizi G (2005) Male mate choice lacking in the agile frog, Rana dalmatina. Copeia 2005:403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Baksay S, Vági B, Hoi H (2009a) Counterstrategies by female frogs to sexual coercion by heterospecific. Anim Behav 78:1365–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Vági B, Hévizi G, Török J (2009b) Changes in sperm stores, ejaculate size, fertilization success, and sexual motivation over repeated matings in the common toad, Bufo bufo (Anura: Bufonidae). Biol J Linn Soc 96:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Vági B, Kovács T, Ujszegi J, Katona P, Szederkényi M, Pearman PB, Griggio M, Hoi H (2014) Reproductive interference between Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria affects reproductive success in natural populations. Oecologia 176:457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76:633–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hödl W (1977) Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia 28:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J (1989) Pairing and spawning patterns in the common toad, Bufo bufo: the effects of sex ratios and the time available for male-male competition. Anim Behav 38:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1988) Chorusing behaviour, a density-dependent alternative mating strategy in male common toads (Bufo bufo). Ethology 79:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Säterberg L (1989) Sexual selection in common toads: correlates with age and body size. J Evol Biol 2:367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RD, Kluge AG (1985) Proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in wood frogs. Evolution 32:260–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Passmore NI (1993) Sperm competition in frogs: testis size and a ‘sterile male’ experiment on Chiromantis xerampeltina (Rhacophoridae). Biol J Linn Soc 50:211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandul NP, Wright KM, Kandul EV, Noor MA (2006) No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura. BMC Evol Biol 6:54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kishi S, Nishida T, Tsubaki Y (2009) Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. J Anim Ecol 78:1043–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyogoku D, Nishida T (2012) The presence of heterospecific males causes an Allee-effect. Popul Ecol 54:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JC (1986) Is large-male mating advantage in anurans an epiphenomenon? Oecologia 69:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengagne T, Grolet O, Joly P (2006) Male mating speed promote hybridization in the Rana lessonaeRana esculenta waterfrog system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengagne T, Plenet S, Joly P (2008) Breeding behaviour and hybridization: variation in male chorusing behaviour promotes mating among taxa in waterfrogs. Anim Behav 75:443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesbarrères D, Lodé T (2002) Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. Ethol Ecol Evol 14:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao WB, Lu X (2012) Variation in mating patterns of the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi along an elevational gradient in southwestern China. Ethol Ecol Evol 24:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1969) Comparative breeding behavior of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora aurora) and the western spotted frog (Rana pretiosa pretiosa) in southwestern British Columbia. Can J Zool 47:1287–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodé T, Lesbarrères D (2004) Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran. Naturwissenschaften 91:44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodé T, Holveck M-J, Lesbarrères D, Pagano A (2004) Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S399–S401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodé T, Holveck M-J, Lesbarrères D (2005) Asynchronous arrival pattern, operational sex ratio and occurrence of multiple paternities in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina. Biol J Linn Soc 86:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loman J, Madsen T (1986) Reproductive tactics of large and small male toads Bufo bufo. Oikos 46:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain KD, Shure DJ (1987) Pseudocompetition: interspecific displacement of insect species through misdirected courtship. Oikos 49:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak P, Rafinski J (1999) Sexual isolation between two newt species, Triturus vulgaris and T. montandoni (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae). Biol J Linn Soc 67:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöllert A, Nöllert C (1992) Die Amphibien Europas. Bestimmung-Gefährdung-Schutz. Franckh-Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Noriyuki S, Osawa N, Nishida T (2012) Asymmetric reproductive interference between specialist and generalist predatory ladybirds. J Anim Ecol 81:1077–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig KS (2007) Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 318:965–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preininger D, Boeckle M, Freudmann A, Starnberger I, Sztatecsny M, Hödl W (2013) Multimodal signalling in the small torrent frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1449–1456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Puky M, Schád P, Szövényi G (2005) Herpetological atlas of Hungary. Varangy Akciócsoport Egyesület, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch AM, Sztatecsny M, Jehle R, Ringler E, Hödl W (2014) Male body size and parental relatedness but not nuptial colouration influence paternity success during scramble competition in Rana arvalis. Behaviour 151:1869–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading CJ (1984) Interspecific spawning between common frogs (Rana temporaria) and common toads (Bufo bufo). J Zool 203:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading CJ (1998) The effect of winter temperatures on the timing of breeding activity in the common toad Bufo bufo. Oecologia 117:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyer H-U, Frei G, Som C (1999) Cryptic female choice: frogs reduce clutch size when amplexed by undesired males. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2101–2107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer JM, Simberloff DS (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128:513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JD, Standish RJ, Byrne PG, Doughty P (1999) Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Anim Behav 57:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser J (1989) The breeding migration and mating system of a Swiss population of the common frog Rana temporaria. Amphibia-Reptilia 10:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Kiesecker JM (2001) Venue and outcome in ecological experiments: manipulation of larval anurans. Oikos 94:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starnberger I, Preininger D, Hödl W (2014) The anuran vocal sac: a tool for multimodal signalling. Anim Behav 97:281–288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sztatecsny M, Jehle R, Burke T, Hödl W (2006) Female polyandry under male harassment: the case of the common toad (Bufo bufo). J Zool 270:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztatecsny M, Preininger D, Freudmann A, Loretto M-C, Maier F, Hödl W (2012) Don’t get the blues: couspicuous nuptial colouration of male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) supports visual mate recognition during scramble competition in large breeding aggregations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1587–1593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vági B, Kovács T, Băncilă R, Hartel T, Anthony BP (2013) A landscape-level study on the breeding site characteristics of ten amphibian species in Central Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 34:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vences M, Hauswaldt JS, Steinfartz S et al (2013) Radically different phylogeographies and patterns of genetic variation in two European brown frogs, genus Rana. Mol Phylogenet Evol 68:657–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz P (1999) Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sandra Baksay, Szilvia Héja, Krisztina Vincze, Péter Turai, and Márk Szederkényi for their help in the field; János Török, Herbert Hoi, and Dustin J. Penn for their continuing support; and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. The Közép-Duna-Völgyi Környezetvédelmi, Természetvédelmi és Vízügyi Felügyelőség issued the permit (Permission No. 13369-2/2008) to conduct the experiments. We would also like to thank the Pilisi Parkerdő Zrt. for allowing us to use their roads.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balázs Vági.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, F-61374), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, P19264), and the “Lendület” program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Summers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vági, B., Hettyey, A. Intraspecific and interspecific competition for mates: Rana temporaria males are effective satyrs of Rana dalmatina females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1477–1484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2156-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2156-5

Keywords

Navigation