Skip to main content
Log in

Family structure and variation in reproductive success in blackbirds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In avian families, some offspring are rendered unequal by parental fiat. By imposing phenotypic handicaps (e.g., via asynchronous hatching) upon certain of their offspring and not others, parents structure the sibship into castes of advantaged “core” offspring and disadvantaged “marginal” offspring that results in an asymmetric sibling rivalry. Here, I show how this family structure scales up to population level reproductive consequences. In a 17-year study of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus), I show that year-to-year variation in the number of surviving offspring is driven primarily by variation in the number of marginal offspring at hatching and their posthatching survival. Clutch size, core brood at hatching, and fledging varied little from year to year and had little direct effect on year-to-year variation in total brood size at fledging; conversely, variation in the size of the marginal brood at hatching and at fledging was much greater. Marginal but not core brood size at hatching rose with mean clutch size; in years where parents laid larger average clutches they did so by adding marginal progeny. The mean posthatching survival of marginal offspring was always lower than that of core offspring in a given year, and there was no overlap in the distributions. The highest mean survival of marginal offspring across years fell below the lowest mean survival of core offspring; broods were deeply structured. There was an overall female bias among fledglings, and the sex ratio varied across years, with a higher proportion of the smaller female nestlings in years of below average reproductive success. Such variation was especially pronounced in the marginal brood where a higher incidence of brood reduction allowed greater potential for sex-biased nestling mortality. In years of the highest average reproductive success, the sex ratio in the marginal brood approached equality, whereas in years of the lowest average reproductive success, more than two thirds of 8-day-old nestlings were female. Structuring the brood into core and marginal elements allowed parents to modulate both offspring number and sex under ecological uncertainty with direct consequences for population-level reproductive success. They produced fewer and less expensive fledglings in below average years and more and more expensive fledglings in above average years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beletsky L (1996) The red-winged blackbird: the biology of a strongly polygynous songbird. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians JK (2002) Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev 77:1–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AB, Wilson DS (1985) The onset of incubation in birds. Am Nat 125:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising CM, Muller W, Groothuis TGG (2006) Avian mothers create different phenotypes by hormone deposition in their eggs. Biol Lett 2:20–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala KL (1981) Sex ratio constancy in the red-winged blackbird. Evolution 35:898–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala KL, Congdon JD (1983) Energetic consequences of sexual size dimorphism in nestling red-winged blackbirds. Ecology 35:898–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes S (2009). Portfolio theory and how parent birds manage investment risk. Oikos (in press)

  • Forbes S, Glassey B (2000) Asymmetric sibling rivalry and nestling growth in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes LS, Thornton S, Glassey B, Forbes M, Buckley NJ (1997) Why parent birds play favourites. Nature 390:351–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes S, Glassey B, Thornton S, Earle L (2001) The secondary adjustment of clutch size in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes S, Grosshans R, Glassey B (2002) Multiple incentives for parental optimism and brood reduction in blackbirds. Ecology 83:2529–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassey B, Forbes S (2002) Begging and asymmetric nestling competition. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) Evolution of nestling begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh CR (1968) Sexual dimorphism, sex ratios and polygyny in the red-winged blackbird. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle

  • Hall M, Blount J, Forbes S, Royle N (2009) Does oxidative stress mediate the trade-off between growth and self-maintenance in structured families? Functional Ecology, in press

  • Holcomb LD, Twiest G (1970) Growth rates and sex ratios of red-winged blackbird nestlings. Wilson Bull 82:294–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laux LJ (1970) Nonbreeding surplus and population structure of the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

  • Loehlin JC (1992) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

  • Magrath RD (1990) Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev 95:587–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock DW, Forbes LS (1995) The evolution of parental optimism. Trends Ecol Evol 10:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock DW, Parker GA (1997) The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nero RW (1984) Redwings. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed WL, Turner AM, Sotherland PR (1999) Consequences of egg-size variation in the red-winged blackbird. Auk 116:549–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle NJ, Surai PF, Hartley IR (2003) The effect of variation in dietary intake on maternal deposition of antioxidants in zebra finch eggs. Funct Ecol 17:472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ (1985) Sex ratios of red-winged blackbirds by egg size and laying sequence. Auk 102:298–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Teather KL (1991) Are skewed fledgling sex ratios in sexually dimorphic birds adaptive? Am Nat 138:1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Dufour LW (2000) Fledging success as an index of recruitment in red-winged blackbirds. Auk 117:627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Dufour LW (2005) Limits to sexual size dimorphism in red-winged blackbirds: the cost of getting big? Biol J Linn Soc Lond 85:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1977) Harem size, territory quality, and reproductive success in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Can J Zool 55:1261–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Muma KE, Maddox JD, Knox JM, Dufour KW (2007) Morphology versus molecules: sexing red-winged blackbird nestlings. J Field Ornithol 78:428–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Clark AB, Rambo KC (1995) Within-brood patterns of paternity and parental behavior in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1994) Intraspecific variation in egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 68:35–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without the assistant of a large and talented group of student assistants over the years. Space does not allow me to acknowledge them all but I would like to thank in particular the following members of the Swamp Crew: Kristin Tuchscherer, Kristjana and Jessie Lee Cameron, Nagu Atmuri, Dobryan Tracz, Dean Swedlo, Saumya Jayakumar, Aaron Trachtenberg, Leanne Grieves, James Rogers, Jodi Griffith, Suzanne Thornton, Richard Grosshans, and Barb Glassey. I thank German Avila-Sakar for help with structural equation modeling and Douglas Mock for many enjoyable days developing the concept of the structured family. This work was made possible by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Forbes.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Pruett-Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forbes, S. Family structure and variation in reproductive success in blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 475–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0863-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0863-x

Keywords

Navigation