Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperatively breeding cichlid fish adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in relation to sperm competition risk

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical models predict that in external fertilisers, sperm competition risk selects for larger testes and larger sperm with higher velocity, at the expense of sperm longevity. Although several empirical studies have tested this prediction within a fish species, there has been little evidence that an individual male can adjust his testis size and sperm traits according to the risk of sperm competition. Using the cooperatively breeding cichlid Julidochromis transcriptus, we examined testis size and sperm traits (sperm size, velocity and longevity) of males that were assigned to monogamous pairs (without risk of sperm competition) or cooperatively polyandrous trios composed of two males and one female (with risk); the groups were reared for breeding for 2 or more months. Our experiments showed that the polyandrous males, both siring eggs in a clutch, had larger relative testis mass than the monogamous males. However, sperm traits were unrelated to sperm competition. These results suggest that individual males of J. transcriptus can adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in response to sperm competition risk. We also examined the effect of testis investment on growth rate and the somatic condition of males. Increased investment in testes slowed growth rates, whereas testis investment did not affect somatic condition, indicating a trade-off between investment in testes and growth. We conclude that testis investment, in response to perceived sperm competition risks, occurs at the expense of growth and may be a conditional reproductive strategy that is determined by the social status (monogamous or polyandrous) of each J. transcriptus male.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awata S, Munehara H, Kohda M (2005) Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:506–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awata S, Takeuchi H, Kohda M (2006a) The effect of body size on mating system and parental roles in a biparental cichlid fish (Julidochromis transcriptus): a preliminary laboratory experiment. J Ethol 24:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awata S, Heg D, Munehara H, Kohda M (2006b) Testis size depends on social status and the presence of male helpers in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Julidochromis ornatus. Behav Ecol 17:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MA, Parker GA (1996) Sperm competition games: external fertilization and ‘adaptive’ infertility. J Theor Biol 180:141–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine S, Leach BJ, Neat F, Werner NY, Montgomerie R (2001) Sperm size of African cichlids in relation to sperm competition. Behav Ecol 12:726–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burness G, Casselman SJ, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Moyes CD, Montgomerie R (2004) Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burness G, Moyes CD, Montgomerie R (2005) Motility, ATP levels and metabolic enzyme activity of sperm from bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Comp Biochem Physiol 140:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Casselman SJ, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Montgomerie R (2006) Sperm quality influences male fertilization success in walleye (Sander vitreus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2119–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina JM, Nouri H (2000) Effect size for ANOVA designs. Sage University Papers Series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, no. 07-129, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Fraipont M, Fitzgerald GJ, Guderley H (1993) Age-related differences in reproductive tactics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 46:961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JL, Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Montgomerie R, Balshine S (2006) Male reproductive suppression in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher. Behav Ecol 17:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JL, Desjardins JK, Milligan N, Montgomerie R, Balshine S (2007) Reproductive-tactic-specific variation in sperm swimming speeds in a shell-brooding cichlid. Biol Reprod 77:280–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Stockley P, Parker GA (1995) Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philos Trans R Soc B 350:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Stockley P, Parker GA (1998) Sperm morphometry in the Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 53:835–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Macfarlane C, Yeates S, Shackleton R, Parker GA (2002) Relationships between sperm morphometry and sperm motility in the Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 61:1528–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA (2004) Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol 14:44–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (1982) Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Z Tierpsychol 60:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bachar Z (2006) Cooperative breeding in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Julidochromis ornatus. Environ Biol Fish 76:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bender N, Hamilton I (2004) Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. Proc R Soc B (Suppl) 271:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoysak DJ, Liley NR (2001) Fertilization dynamics in sockeye salmon and a comparison of sperm from alternative male phenotypes. J Fish Biol 58:1286–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamatsu T, Onitake K, Yoshimoto Y, Hiramoto Y (1991) Time sequence of early events in fertilization in the medaka egg. Dev Growth Differ 33:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakov RV (1981) Peculiarities of sperm production by anadromous and parr Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and fish cultural characteristics of such sperm. J Fish Biol 18:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings A (1998) Tanganyika cichlids in their natural habitat. Cichlid, El Paso

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortet R, Vainikka A, Rantala MJ, Taskinen J (2004) Sperm quality, secondary sexual characters and parasitism in roach (Rutilus rutilus L.). Biol J Linn Soc 81:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwamura T (1997) The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyikan cichlids. In: Kawanabe H, Hori M, Nagoshi M (eds) Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, pp 57–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR (2000) Sperm velocity and longevity trade off each other and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Proc R Soc B 267:531–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liley NR, Tamkee P, Tsai R, Hoysak DJ (2002) Fertilization dynamics in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): effect of male age, social experience, and sperm concentration and motility on in vitro fertilization. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes H (1959) Un Cichlidae nouveau du lac Tanganika. Julidochromis transcriptus n. sp. Rev Zool Bot Afr LX 1–2:126–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216:753–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD, Fu P, Gross MR (2003) Sperm investment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol 14:634–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1982) Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol 96:281–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990) Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc R Soc B 242:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London, pp 3–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW, Warner RR (1998) Sperm competition in fishes. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London, pp 435–463

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolfsen G, Fingenschou L, Folstad I, Tveiten H, Fingenschou M (2006) Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status. Proc R Soc B 273:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Burness G (2005) Fertilization dynamics of sperm from different male mating tactics in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Can J Zool 83:1638–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro DY, Marconato A, Yoshikawa T (1994) Sperm economy in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Ecology 75:1334–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR (2005) Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 20:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz JA, Neff BD (2006) Sperm competition in a fish with external fertilization: the contribution of sperm number, speed and length. J Evol Biol 19:1873–1881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1994) Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv Study Behav 23:1–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1997) Bourgeois and parasitic tactics: do we need collective, functional terms for alternative reproductive behaviours? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:361–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1998) Sperm competition in fish: ‘bourgeois’ males and parasitic spawning. Trends Ecol Evol 13:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (2001) The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. J Heredity 92:100–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2002) Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Anim Behav 63:1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uglem I, Rosenqvist G, Wasslavik HS (2000) Phenotypic variation between dimorphic males in corkwing wrasse. J Fish Biol 57:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uglem I, Galloway TF, Rosenqvist G, Folstad I (2001) Male dimorphism, sperm traits and immunology in the corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladic TV, Järvi T (2001) Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proc R Soc B 268:2375–2381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vladic TV, Afzelius BA, Bronnikov GE (2002) Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biol Reprod 66:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner RR (2001) Synthesis: environment, mating systems, and life history allocations in the bluehead wrasse. In: Dugatkin LA (ed) Model systems in behavioral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, pp 227–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner RR, Robertson DR, Leigh EG Jr (1975) Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190:633–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Klumer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi S, Kohda M (1996) Is the cichlid fish Julidochromis marlieri polyandrous? Ichthyol Res 43:469–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates S, Searle J, Ward RG, Gage MJG (2007) A two-second delay confers first-male fertilization precedence within in vitro sperm competition experiments in Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 70:318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer EJ, Kallman KD (1989) Genetic basis for alternative reproductive tactics in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis. Evolution 43:1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Shibata and K. Ota for their help during the aquarium experiments, and Y. Tarui, H. Muhehara, Y. Hayakawa, R. Kato, R. Tamai, M. Miyata and the members of the Laboratory of Cell Biology, Osaka City University, for their help with the measurements of sperm concentration and sperm traits. We are also grateful to D. Heg, Y. Nakashima, K. Karino, D. Gomagano, K. Lindström and two anonymous referees for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. This study received financial support to M.K. from a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and was partly supported by the 21st Century COE program of the University of the Ryukyus and Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists to S.A. The research presented here was performed in compliance with the guideline of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Osaka City University and the Japan Ethological Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Awata.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Lindström

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Awata, S., Takeyama, T., Makino, Y. et al. Cooperatively breeding cichlid fish adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in relation to sperm competition risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1701–1710 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0598-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0598-0

Keywords

Navigation