Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is equivalent to a standard-length stem procedure in an unselected population at mid-term follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Limitations of standard-length femoral stems persist, including proximal-distal mismatch, non-ideal load transfer, loss of bone tissue, and perioperative fracture. Symbol® (Dedienne Santé, France) is a metaphyseal-engaging short-stem implant designed to address these issues in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While short stems have been well studied in selected and younger patients, it is unclear whether they offer advantages in an unselected population. We hypothesized that short femoral stems offer similar mid-term survivorship at five year minimum follow-up and function score to standard-length femoral stems, in an unselected patient population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a continuous unselected cohort of patients who undergone THA by one surgeon with a standard-length stem between November 2013 and October 2015, and a short stem between November 2015 and March 2017. We compared modified Harris Hip Score and Oxford Scores with a minimum follow-up of five years and procedural factors that could be associated with worse results with a short stem design.

Results

There was no difference in survival rate between the two groups. Average Harris Hip Score and Oxford Scores at the last follow-up were comparable. A multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between modified Harrys Hip Score at five years post-operatively and the explanatory variables: age, body mass index, physical status score ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and HHS pre-op. None was associated with the standard-length stem but for the short stem.

Conclusion

Short-stem implants provide good survival rate at mid-term; nevertheless, a steep learning curve is necessary to optimize the metaphyseal filling of the implant, especially for osteoporotic bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Banerjee S, Pivec R, Issa K, Harwin SF, Mont MA, Khanuja HS (2013) Outcomes of short stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 36:700–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Falez F, Casella F, Papalia M (2015) Current concepts, classification, and results in short stem hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 38(Suppl):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wegrzyn J, Roux JP, Loriau C, Bonin N, Pibarot V (2018) The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 42(10):2329–2334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3843-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan G Molli 1 , Adolph V Lombardi Jr, Keith R Berend, Joanne B Adams, Michael A Sneller A, (2012) Short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty. lin Orthop Relat Res, 470(2): p. 450-461.: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2068-7.

  5. A. Jacquel, A. Le Viguelloux, J. Valluy, M. Saffarini , N. Bonin, (2019) A shortened uncemented stem offers comparable positioning and increased metaphyseal fill compared to a standard uncemented stem. J Exp Orthop, 25;6(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0197-1.

  6. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB (2009) A short stem solution: through small portals. Orthopedics 32(9). https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090728-09

  7. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Skeels MD, Adams JB (2009) Survivorship of 2000 tapered titanium porous plasma-sprayed femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stulberg SD, Dolan M (2008) The short stem: a thinking man’s alter- native to surface replacement. Orthopedics 31:885–886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santori FS, Santori N (2010) Mid-term results of a custom-made short proximal loading femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1231–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meding JB, Galley MR, Ritter MA (2010) High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteo- porotic bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:441–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Loweg L, Kutzner KP, Trost M, Hechtner M, Drees P, Pfeil J, Schneider M (2018) The learning curve in short-stem THA: influence of the surgeon’s experience on intraoperative adjustments due to intraoperative radiography. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2049-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berend KR, Mallory TH, Lombardi AV Jr, Dodds KL, Adams JB (2007) Tapered cementless femoral stem: difficult to place in varus but performs well in those rare cases. Orthopedics 30:295–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weenders SGM, Merfort R, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Gruner A, Heller KD (2023) Ten-year followup and clinical outcome of a metaphyseal anchoring short hip stem prosthesis: a retrospective single-centre analysis. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05958-9

  15. Anderl C, Johl C, Krüger T, Hubel W, Weigert U, Mittelstaedt H, Ortmaier R (2023) Subsidence after calcar-guided short stem total hip arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective multicentre study. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05934-3

  16. Kim HS, Lee YK, Ha JH, Park SJ, Park JW, Koo KH (2022) Distribution and outliers of anteversion of short-length cementless stem. Int Orthop 46(4):725–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05265-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Olivier Barbier: redaction

Gilles Estour: redaction

Robian Rassat: data collect

Alexandre Caubère: data analysis

Sonia Dubreuil: data collect

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Barbier.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

Olivier Barbier: consulting for Arthrex and Dediène Santé. Gilles Estour: consulting for Dediène Santé. Robian Rassat, Alexandre Caubère, Sonia Dubreuil: no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbier, O., Rassat, R., Caubère, A. et al. Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is equivalent to a standard-length stem procedure in an unselected population at mid-term follow-up. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 48, 1017–1022 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06020-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06020-4

Keywords

Navigation