Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results of the osteochondral autologous transplantation for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with harvesting from the ipsilateral talar articular facets

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 13 September 2022

Abstract

Purpose

There are few studies on the clinical outcomes of osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) harvesting from local talar non-weight-bearing articular facets for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). The purpose of this study was to review the short- to midterm outcomes of our patients who were treated with OAT harvesting from ipsilateral talar articular facets for OLTs.

Methods

Between December 2010 and November 2018, 24 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 16 males and eight females with an average age of 39.1 years and a follow-up period of 50.9 months. The clinical results were evaluated according to the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Pre-operative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, post-operative radiographs, and X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scans at the last follow-up were observed.

Results

There was a significant improvement in the AOFAS score from 61.3 ± 19.0 pre-operatively to 84.9 ± 9.2 post-operatively (P < 0.001). The VAS score improved from 6.1 ± 2.3 to 2.0 ± 1.4 at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Twenty-one patients (87.5%) were satisfied with their clinical results. By the last follow-up CT scan, there was bone cyst formation at the donor sites in three patients, at the recipient sites in five patients and at both sites in five patients. Two patients (8.3%) underwent re-operation with arthroscopic debridement because of medial gutter hypertrophic soft tissue impingement.

Conclusion

OAT harvesting from the ipsilateral talar articular facet showed satisfactory results. The mean post-operative VAS score and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score improved significantly. Post-operative impingement around the osteotomy site was the main complication and reason for re-operation after the index procedure. In addition, bone cysts at the recipient and/or donor site(s) were found with a large percentage under CT. Therefore, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the long-term clinical results for this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Seow D, Shimozono Y, Gianakos AL et al (2021) Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: high rate of return to play in the athletic population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(5):1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06216-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becher C, Thermann H (2005) Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 26(8):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502600801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Ambrosi R, Villafane JH, Indino C, Liuni FM, Berjano P, Usuelli FG (2019) Return to sport after arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for patients with osteochondral lesion of the talus. Clin J Sport Med 29(6):470–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Rashidy H, Villacis D, Omar I, Kelikian AS (2011) Fresh osteochondral allograft for the treatment of cartilage defects of the talus: a retrospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(17):1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayyaswamy B, Salim M, Sidaginamale R, Elsayed M, Karpe P, Limaye R (2021) Early to medium term outcomes of osteochondral lesions of the talus treated by autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). Foot Ankle Surg 27(2):207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murawski CD, Kennedy JG (2013) Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(11):1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartha L, Vajda A, Duska Z, Rahmeh H, Hangody L (2006) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty grafting. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(10):739–750. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.2182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Thermann H (2010) Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(5):656–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1036-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA et al (2008) Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med 36(9):1750–1762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508316773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzpatrick N, van Terheijden C, Yeadon R, Smith TJ (2010) Osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the caudocentral humeral head in dogs. Vet Surg 39(8):925–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00758.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gobbi A, Francisco RA, Lubowitz JH, Allegra F, Canata G (2006) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 22(10):1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee KB, Bai LB, Yoon TR, Jung ST, Seon JK (2009) Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 37 Suppl 1:63S-70S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509348471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hangody L, Vasarhelyi G, Hangody LR et al (2008) Autologous osteochondral grafting–technique and long-term results. Injury 39 Suppl 1:S32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy S, Pedowitz DI, Parekh SG, Sennett BJ, Okereke E (2007) The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 35(1):80–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506290986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scranton PE Jr, Frey CC, Feder KS (2006) Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(5):614–619. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Valderrabano V, Leumann A, Rasch H, Egelhof T, Hintermann B, Pagenstert G (2009) Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 37 Suppl 1:105S-111S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509351481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimozono Y, Seow D, Yasui Y, Fields K, Kennedy JG (2019) Knee-to-talus donor-site morbidity following autologous osteochondral transplantation: a meta-analysis with best-case and worst-case analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477(8):1915–1931. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000719

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sammarco GJ, Makwana NK (2002) Treatment of talar osteochondral lesions using local osteochondral graft. Foot Ankle Int 23(8):693–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, Lahm A, Henle P, Niemeyer P (2006) Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505278299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Georgiannos D, Bisbinas I, Badekas A (2016) Osteochondral transplantation of autologous graft for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of talus: 5- to 7-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3722–3729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3389-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW (2009) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med 37(10):1974–1980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509335765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai L, Guan S, Liu S et al (2020) Clinical outcomes of osteochondral lesions of the talus with large subchondral cysts treated with osteotomy and autologous chondral grafts: minimum 2-year follow-up and second-look evaluation. Orthop J Sports Med 8(7):2325967120937798. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120937798

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gudas R, Gudaite A, Pocius A et al (2012) Ten-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint of athletes. Am J Sports Med 40(11):2499–2508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512458763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hangody L, Feczko P, Bartha L, Bodo G, Kish G (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res (391 Suppl):S328–336. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200110001-00030

  25. Cuttica DJ, Smith WB, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2011) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: predictors of clinical outcome. Foot Ankle Int 32(11):1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saxena A, Eakin C (2007) Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1680–1687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507303561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park KH, Hwang Y, Han SH et al (2018) Primary versus secondary osteochondral autograft transplantation for the treatment of large osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 46(6):1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518758014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YS, Park EH, Kim YC, Koh YG, Lee JW (2012) Factors associated with the clinical outcomes of the osteochondral autograft transfer system in osteochondral lesions of the talus: second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2709–2719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512461132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haleem AM, Ross KA, Smyth NA et al (2014) Double-plug autologous osteochondral transplantation shows equal functional outcomes compared with single-plug procedures in lesions of the talar dome: a minimum 5-year clinical follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42(8):1888–1895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514535068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanaka Y, Omokawa S, Fujii T, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y (2006) Vascularized bone graft from the medial calcaneus for treatment of large osteochondral lesions of the medial talus. Foot Ankle Int 27(12):1143–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602701222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Visona E, Chouteau J, Aldegheri R, Fessy MH, Moyen B (2010) Patella osteochondritis dissecans end stage: the osteochondral mosaicplasty option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(5):543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Savage-Elliott I, Smyth NA, Deyer TW et al (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of postoperative cyst formation does not appear to affect clinical outcomes after autologous osteochondral transplantation of the talus. Arthroscopy 32(9):1846–1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carrino JA, Blum J, Parellada JA, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB (2006) MRI of bone marrow edema-like signal in the pathogenesis of subchondral cysts. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14(10):1081–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2006.05.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi WJ, Kim BS, Lee JW (2012) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: could age be an indication for arthroscopic treatment? Am J Sports Med 40(2):419–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511423739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi WJ, Jo J, Lee JW (2013) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome after arthroscopic marrow stimulation technique. Foot Ankle Clin 18(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2012.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee KB, Park HW, Cho HJ, Seon JK (2015) Comparison of arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus with and without subchondral cyst. Am J Sports Med 43(8):1951–1956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515584755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woelfle JV, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2013) Indications and limitations of osteochondral autologous transplantation in osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(8):1925–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2483-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Quan Yu Dong: designed the study, edited, and reviewed the manuscript. Dong Dong Wan: data collection and analysis, reviewed the literature, and prepared the manuscript. Heng Huang and Mao Zhong Hu: radiologic assessments and reviewed the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quan Yu Dong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Not applicable (retrospective study).

Consent for publication

All authors consent publication of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of evidence: IV

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, D.D., Huang, H., Hu, M.Z. et al. Results of the osteochondral autologous transplantation for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with harvesting from the ipsilateral talar articular facets. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 1547–1555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05380-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05380-7

Keywords

Navigation