Skip to main content
Log in

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus deformities greater than ten degrees: survival analysis at a mean ten year follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Total knee arthoplasty (TKA) is a secure procedure with more than 90% survival at ten years. The purpose of this study was to report both clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA with a varus > 10°. The second objective was to identify risk factors for failure or bad clinical results. Our hypothesis was that results and survey are comparable to TKA with lesser deformities.

Methods

Eighty-two TKA (69 patients) between January 2004 and December 2008 with a varus > 10° were reviewed retrospectively. The endpoints were clinical (range of motion, IKS knee score, Oxford, and SF-12) and radiological (HKA post-operative and the existence of radiolucent lines or loosening at last follow-up).

Results

Sixty-three TKA (55 patients) were assessed with a mean follow-up of 10.9 years. The global IKS score significantly increased (p = 0.04). Seven TKA needed a revision: two for sepsis, four for aseptic loosening, and one for polyethylene wear, with an overall survival of 91.6% at ten years. For aseptic loosening, the survival rate was 94.7% at ten years. Risk factors for failure were age (p = 0.001), weight (p = 0.04), and a post-operative HKA lesser than 175° (p = 0.05) for aseptic loosening.

Discussion

The hypothesis was confirmed: the results showed a significant improvement of function and quality of life with a survival rate comparable to those found in the literature for greater varus but also inferior to 10°. Three risk factors have been identified suggesting increased surveillance in these cases.

Conclusion

The results of this survey confirm the work hypothesis. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with important axial deformities is a confirmed, reliable, patient-friendly and predictable good outcome procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ritter MA (2009) The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91B:745–749. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Fernandez R, Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2015) Better survival of total knee replacement in patients older than 70 years: a prospective study with 8 to 12 years follow-up. Arch Bone Joint Surg 3:22–28

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM (1991) Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73A:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2002) Early failures among 7,174 primary total knee replacements: a follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2000. Acta Orthop Scand 73:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164702753671678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lygre SH, Vollset SE, Furnes O (2011) Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing. Acta Orthop 82:282–292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sundberg M, Lidgren L, W-Dahl A, Robertsson O. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register ; Lund University. http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK

  8. Gøthesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Lygre S, Ellison P et al (2013) Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2009. Bone Joint J 95:636–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Argenson JN, Boisgard S, Parratte S, Descamps S, Bercovy M, Bonnevialle P et al (2013) Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Teeny SM, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS, Jones M (1991) Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karachalios T, Sarangi PP, Newman JH (1994) Severe varus and valgus deformities treated by total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:938–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ritter MA, Faris GW, Faris PM, Davis KE (2004) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with angular varus or valgus deformities of > or = 20 degrees. J Arthroplast 19:862–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.009

  13. Harrysson OL, Robertsson O, Nayfeh JF (2004) Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mullaji AB, Padmanabhan V, Jindal G (2005) Total knee arthroplasty for profound varus deformity: technique and radiological results in 173 knees with varus of more than 20 degrees. J Arthroplast 20:550–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of a low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surgery (Br) 54:61–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Devane PA, Robinson EJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Nayak NN, Horne JG (1997) Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:682–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ornetti P, Perruccio AV, Roos EM, Lohmander LS, Davis AM, Maillefert JF (2009) Psychometric properties of the French translation of the reduced KOOS and HOOS (KOOS-PS and HOOS-PS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1604–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu HC, Kuo FC, Huang CC, Wang JW (2015) Mini-midvastus total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. Orthopedics 38:e112–e117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Kim YD, In Y (2017) Correcting severe Varus deformity using trial components during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:1488–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Czekaj J, Fary C, Gaillard T, Lustig S (2017) Does low-constraint mobile bearing knee prosthesis give satisfactory results for severe coronal deformities? A five to twelve year follow up study. Int Orthop 41:1369–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saragaglia D, Sigwalt L, Gaillot J, Morin V, Rubens-Duval B, Pailhé R (2017) Results with eight and a half years average follow-up on two hundred and eight e-Motion FP® knee prosthesis, fitted using computer navigation for knee osteoarthritis in patients with over ten degrees genu varum. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3618-8

  24. Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP, Camargo MP (2001) Ten- to 14-year clinical follow up of the cementless natural knee system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts VI, Esler CN, Harper WM (2007) A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:1452–1456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF, Jenning MT, Hanssen AD (2015) Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with BMI ≥35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 30:2181–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fehring TK, Fehring KA, Anderson LA, Otero JE, Springer BD (2017) Catastrophic varus collapse of the tibia in obese total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:1625–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Ehlinger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

PA: consulting activity for Depuy-Synthes

FB: consulting activity for Serf, Amplitude

ME: consulting activity Depuy-Synthes, Newclip, Lepine

BP, DE, HF: None

Additional information

Level of evidence: IV, retrospective study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puliero, B., Favreau, H., Eichler, D. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus deformities greater than ten degrees: survival analysis at a mean ten year follow-up. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 333–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4019-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4019-3

Keywords

Navigation