Abstract
Purposes
The objectives of this study were to investigate patient-reported outcomes and referral pain at the first visit in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and to clarify the influence of collapse of the femoral head and the contralateral condition.
Methods
The study included 105 patients (130 hips) with ONFH at the first visit, who were divided into two groups based on the presence of bilateral walking hip pain (bilateral group 25 patients, 50 hips) and unilateral hip pain (unilateral group 80 patients, 80 hips). We compared the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) responses for hip, knee, and low back pain between the groups to investigate the influence of the contralateral condition. Regarding the influence of femoral head collapse, we investigated these subjects based on the stage classification in the unilateral group.
Results
The physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36 and all domains of the JHEQ were poorer in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group. In addition, the VAS score for low back pain was significantly poorer in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group. Regarding the collapse of the femoral head, the SF-36 for the PCS and JHEQ for pain had a significant relationship in the ONFH stage. The VAS scores for hip and knee pain had a significant relationship in the ONFH stage.
Conclusion
Collapse of the femoral head and the contralateral condition of ONFH strongly affect patients’ activities of daily life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seki T, Hasegawa Y, Masui T et al (2008) Quality of life following femoral osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci 13:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1208-0
Hauzeur JP, Malaise M, de Maertelaer V (2016) A prospective cohort study of the clinical presentation of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: spine and knee symptoms as clinical presentation of hip osteonecrosis. Int Orthop 40:1347–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3079-x
Mont MA, Hungerford DS (1995) Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:459–474. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199503000-00018
Sugioka Y, Hotokebuchi T, Tsutsui H (1992) Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for idiopathic and steroid-induced necrosis of the femoral head. Indications and long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277:111–120
Hasegawa Y, Sakano S, Iwase T, Iwasada S, Torii S, Iwata H (2003) Pedicle bone grafting versus transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg B 85:191–198
Sakano S, Hasegawa Y, Torii Y, Kawasaki M, Ishiguro N (2004) Curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14383
Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ, Jones LC, Lieberman JR (2015) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? A ten-year update. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1604–1627
Tsukanaka M, Halvorsen V, Nordsletten L et al (2016) Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old. Acta Orthop 87:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1212180
Nakamura J, Konno K, Orita S et al (2017) Distribution of hip pain in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Mod Rheumatol 27:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2016.1209830
Sugano N, Atsumi T, Ohzono K, Kubo T, Hotokebuchi T, Takaoka K (2002) The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis, classification, and staging of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci 7:601–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760200108
Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K (1998) Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1037–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X
Matsumoto T, Kaneuji A, Hiejima Y et al (2012) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ): a patient-based evaluation tool for hip-joint disease. The Subcommittee on Hip Disease Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 17:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0166-8
Yoshii H, Oinuma K, Tamaki T, Miura Y, Kaneyama R, Shiratsuchi H (2016) Comparison of patient satisfaction after unilateral or simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 21:332–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.008
Nakamura J, Oinuma K, Ohtori S et al (2013) Distribution of hip pain in osteoarthritis patients secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Mod Rheumatol 23:119–124
Hsieh PH, Chang Y, Chen DW, Lee MS, Shih HN, Ueng SW (2012) Pain distribution and response to total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational study in 113 patients with end-stage hip disease. J Orthop Sci 17:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0204-1
Weng W-J, Wang W-J, Wu M-D et al (2014) Characteristics of sagittal spine–pelvis–leg alignment in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. Eur Spine J 24:1228–1236
Yoshimoto H, Sato S, Masuda T et al (2005) Spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip: a radiographic comparison to patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1650–1657. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169446.69758.fa
Wong TK, Lee RY (2004) Effects of low back pain on the relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Hum Mov Sci 23:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2004.03.004
Cibulka MT, Sinacore DR, Cromer GS, Delitto A (1998) Unilateral hip rotation range of motion asymmetry in patients with sacroiliac joint regional pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1009–1115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199805010-00009
Sayeed SA, Johnson AJ, Jaffe DE, Mont MA (2012) Incidence of contralateral THA after index THA for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:535–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2110-9
Ikeuchi K, Hasegawa Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Amano T, Ishiguro N (2015) Epidemiology of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Japan. Mod Rheumatol 25:278–281
Takahashi S, Fukushima W, Yamamoto T et al (2015) Japanese Sentinel Monitoring Study Group for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Temporal trends in characteristics of newly diagnosed nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head from 1997 to 2011: a hospital-based sentinel monitoring system in Japan. J Epidemiol 25:437–444
Okura T, Hasegawa Y, Morita D, Osawa Y, Ishiguro N (2016) What factors predict the failure of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(12):1647–1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2563-0
Morita D, Hasegawa Y, Okura T, Osawa Y, Ishiguro N (2017) Long-term outcomes of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Bone Joint J 99-B(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0417.R2
Osawa Y, Seki T, Morita D, Takegami Y, Okura T, Ishiguro N (2017) Total hip arthroplasty after transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a mean 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 32(10):3088–3092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was based on a retrospective chart review and was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All patients provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osawa, Y., Seki, T., Takegami, Y. et al. Do femoral head collapse and the contralateral condition affect patient-reported quality of life and referral pain in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 1463–1468 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3867-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3867-1