Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies—a legitimate concern?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Due to a supposed high rate of nonunions in lateral open wedge distal femur osteotomy (LOWDFO), the medial closing wedge technique has been favoured for a long time. The aim of this study was to report the occurrence of delayed- and nonunions following LOWDFO. We hypothesized that the occurrence of nonunions needing revision surgery is comparable to medial closing osteotomies.

Methods

Forty-one patients were treated with LOWDFO with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Parameters such as age, gender, body mass index, valgus angle, the heights of the opening wedge, as well as the type of osteotomy (biplane vs single plane) were collected. Delayed union and nonunion were evaluated on radiographs along with clinical symptoms.

Results

The study group consisted of 21 females and 20 males, with a median age of 37 years at the time of surgery. Removal of hardware was performed in 63% after 1.3 years (0.6–2.1 years). The median preoperative valgus angle was 6.1° valgus (range 2–15.5°). The heights of the opening wedge ranged from 2 to 12 mm (mean 5.3 mm). Hinge fracture of the medial cortex was seen in 39%. Three patients had a delayed union, and one patient had a nonunion requiring revision surgery.

Conclusion

LOWDFO is a safe alternative to MCWDFO. Although radiolucency of the osteotomy gap can be evident on radiographs even after 12 months, this does not reflect the clinical finding. The nonunion rate is proven to be low and comparable with the nonunion rates of MCWDFOs as well as open wedge HTOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G, Blonna D, Marmotti A, Bruzzone M et al (2014) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 42(3):690–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller BS, Downie B, McDonough B, Wojtys EM (2009) Complications after medial opening wedge high Tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 25(6):639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson J (1958) Osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Proceedings of the Sheffield regional Orthopaedic Club. J Bone Joint Surg Br 40:826

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schatzker J, Burgess R, Glynn M (1985) The management of nonunions following high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:230–233

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron H, Welsh R, Jung Y, Noftall F (1993) Repair of nonunion of tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:167–169

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flamme C, Kohn D, Kirsch L, Hurschler C (1999) Primary stability of different implants used in conjunction with high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:450–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia—early results in 92 cases. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B55–B62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoell S, Suttmoeller J, Stoll V, Fuchs S, Gosheger G (2005) The high tibial osteotomy, open versus closed wedge, a comparison of methods in 108 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:638–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Edgerton BC, Mariani EM, Morrey BF (1993) Distal femoral varus osteotomy for painful genu valgum. A five-to-11-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (288):263–9

  12. Mathews J, Cobb AG, Richardson S, Bentley G (1998) Distal femoral osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthopedics 21(4):437–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Puddu G, Cipolla M, Cerullo G, Franco V, Giannì E (2010) Which osteotomy for a valgus knee? Int Orthop 34(2):239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobenhoffer P, De Simoni C, Staubli AE (2002) Open wedge high-tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation. Tech Knee Surg 1:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyonos L, Slenker N, Cohen S (2012) Complications in brief: osteotomy for lower extremity malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(12):3630–3636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McDermott AG, Finklestein JA, Farine I, Boynton EL, MacIntosh DL, Gross A (1988) Distal femoral varus osteotomy for valgus deformity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(1):110–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Healy WL, Anglen JO, Wasilewski SA, Krackow KA (1988) Distal femoral varus osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(1):102–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brinkman JM, Hurschler C, Staubli AE, van Heerwaarden RJ (2011) Axial and torsional stability of an improved single-plane and a new bi-plane osteotomy technique for supracondylar femur osteotomies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1090–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Heerwaarden R, Najfeld M, Brinkman M, Seil R, Madry H, Pape D (2013) Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dahl A, Lidgren L, Sundberg M, Robertsson O (2015) Introducing prospective national registration of knee osteotomies. A report from the first year in Sweden. Int Orthop 39(7):1283–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. USFDA (1988) Guidance document for the preparation of investigational device exemptions and pre-market approval applications for bone growth stimulator devices. United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han JH, Kim HJ, Song JG, Yang JH, Bhandare NN, Fernandez AR, Park HJ, Nha KW (2015) Is bone grafting necessary in opening wedge high Tibial osteotomy? A meta-analysis of radiological outcomes. Knee Surg Relat Res 27(4):207–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Kolb K, Koller H, Grutzner P (2009) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked low-profile plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2581–2588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brinker MR (2003) Nonunions: evaluation and treatment. In: Trafton PG (ed) Skeletal Trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 507–604

    Google Scholar 

  25. Batista B, Salim R, Paccola C, Kfuri M (2014) Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures? Acta Ortop Bras 22(3):159–162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chapman MW, Finkemeiere CG (1999) Treatment of supracondylar nonunions of the femur with plate fixation and bone graft. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(A):1217–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gardner MJ, Toro-Arbelaez JB, Harrison M, Hierholzer C, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2008) Open reduction and internal fixation of distal femoral nonunions: long-term functional outcomes following a treatment protocol. J Trauma 64(2):434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holzman MA, Hanus BD, Munz JW, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR (2016) Addition of a medial locking plate to an in situ lateral locking plate results in healing of distal femoral nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(6):1498–1505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Saragaglia D, Chedal-Bornu B (2014) Computer-assisted osteotomy for valgus knees: medium-term results of 29 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(5):527–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Carvalho LH Jr, Temponi EF, Soares LF, Gonçalves MB, Costa LP (2014) Physical activity after distal femur osteotomy for the treatment of lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(7):1607–1611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacobi M, Wahl P, Bouaicha S, Jakob RP, Gautier E (2011) Distal femoral varus osteotomy: problems associated with the lateral open-wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:725–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ekeland A, Nerhus TK, Dimmen S, Heir S (2016) Good functional results of distal femoral opening-wedge osteotomy of knees with lateral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(5):1702–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cameron JI, McCauley JC, Kermanshahi AY, Bugbee WD (2015) Lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: pain relief, functional improvement, and survivorship at 5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:2009–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saithna A, Kundra R, Getgood A, Spalding T (2014) Opening wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis in the valgus knee. Knee 21:172–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Özcan Ç, Sökücü S, Beng K, Çetinkaya E, Demir B, Kabukçuoğlu YS (2016) Prospective comparative study of two methods for fixation after distal femur corrective osteotomy for valgus deformity; retrograde intramedullary nailing versus less invasive stabilization system plating. Int Orthop 40(10):2121–2126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wylie JD, Jones DL, Hartley MK, Kapron AL, Krych AJ, Aoki SK, Maak TG (2016) Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: medial closing wedge versus lateral opening wedge: a systematic review arthroscopy. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 32(10):2141–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors confirm that this article was written without direct nor indirect financial support of any corporate bodies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sport Orthopaedics, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany

    Franz Liska, Andreas Voss, Florian B. Imhoff, Lukas Willinger & Andreas B. Imhoff

Authors
  1. Franz Liska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Voss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florian B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lukas Willinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andreas B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Liska.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liska, F., Voss, A., Imhoff, F.B. et al. Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies—a legitimate concern?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 9–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3504-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3504-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation