Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No need for broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic coverage after surgical drainage of orthopaedic implant infections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment for orthopaedic implant infections after surgical lavage is common practice while awaiting microbiological results, but lacks evidence.

Methods

This was a single-centre cohort study from 1996 to 2010 with a follow-up of two years.

Results

We retrieved 342 implant infections and followed them up for a median of 3.5 years (61 recurred, 18 %). Infected implants were arthroplasties (n = 186), different plates, nails or other osteosyntheses. The main pathogens were S. aureus (163, 49 methicillin-resistant) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (60, 45 methicillin-resistant). Median duration of empirical antibiotic coverage after surgical drainage was three days before switching to targeted therapy. Vancomycin was the most frequent initial empirical agent (147), followed by intravenous co-amoxiclav (44). Most empirical antibiotic regimens (269, 79 %) proved sensitive to the causative pathogen, but were too broad in 111 episodes (32 %). Cephalosporins and penicillins were used only in 44 and ten cases, respectively, although they would have covered 59 % of causative pathogens identified later. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that neither susceptible antibiotic coverage (compared to non-susceptible; hazard ratio 0.7, 95 % confidence interval 0.4–1.2) nor broad-spectrum use (hazard ratio 1.1, 0.8–1.5) changed remission rates.

Conclusions

Provided that surgical drainage is performed, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage does not enhance remission of orthopaedic implant infections during the first three days. If empirical agents are prescribed from the first day of infection, narrow-spectrum penicillins or cephalosporins can be considered to avoid unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:1–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moran E, Masters S, Berendt AR, McLardy-Smith P, Byren I, Atkins BL (2007) Guiding empirical antibiotic therapy in orthopaedics: the microbiology of prosthetic joint infection managed by debridement, irrigation and prosthesis retention. J Infect 55:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sousa R, Pereira A, Massada M, da Silva MV, Lemos R, Costa e Castro J (2010) Empirical antibiotic therapy in prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop Belg 76:254–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheehy SH, Atkins BA, Bejon P, Byren I, Wyllie D, Athanasou NA, Berendt AR, McNally MA (2010) The microbiology of chronic osteomyelitis: prevalence of resistance to common empirical anti-microbial regimens. J Infect 60:338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teterycz D, Ferry T, Lew D, Stern R, Assal M, Hoffmeyer P, Bernard L, Uçkay I (2010) Outcome of orthopedic implant infections due to different staphylococci. Int J Infect Dis 14:913–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mortazavi SM, Vegari D, Ho A, Zmistowski B, Parvizi J (2011) Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3049–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, Carbonez A, Van Eldere J (2004) Metabolic activity of Staphylococcus epidermidis is high during initial and low during late experimental foreign-body infection. J Bacteriol 186:2236–2239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Uçkay I, Harbarth S, Peter R, Lew D, Hoffmeyer P, Pittet D (2010) Preventing surgical site infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:657–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harbarth S, Samore MH, Lichtenberg D, Carmeli Y (2000) Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Circulation 101:2916–2921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malekzadeh D, Osmon DR, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Berbari EF (2010) Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2039–2045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (2007) 17th informational supplement (standard M100-S17). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

  12. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE (2007) Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 165:710–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uçkay I, Lübbeke A, Harbarth S, Emonet S, Tovmirzaeva L, Agostinho A, Longtin Y, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P, Pittet D (2012) Low risk despite high endemicity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections following elective total joint arthroplasty: a 12-year experience. Ann Med 44:360–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uçkay I, Harbarth S, Ferry T, Lübbeke A, Emonet S, Hoffmeyer P, Pittet D (2011) Meticillin resistance in orthopaedic coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. J Hosp Infect 79:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cranny G, Elliott R, Weatherly H, Chambers D, Hawkins N, Myers L, Sculpher M, Eastwood A (2008) A systematic review and economic model of switching from non-glycopeptide to glycopeptide antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. Health Technol Assess 12:iii–iv, xi–xii, 1–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Gullerud R, Osmon DR (2007) Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis 45:1113–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351:1645–1654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all colleagues of the Orthopedic Service of Geneva University Hospitals. Ilker Uçkay had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilker Uçkay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schindler, M., Gamulin, A., Belaieff, W. et al. No need for broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic coverage after surgical drainage of orthopaedic implant infections. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 2025–2030 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1924-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1924-3

Keywords

Navigation