Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Six-year outcome of thoracoscopic ventral spondylodesis after unstable incomplete cranial burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: ventral versus dorso-ventral strategy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine the long term-results after thoracoscopic spondylodesis particularly with respect to a ventral versus dorso-ventral treatment strategy.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, a follow-up examination was performed in 19 patients (seven men, 12 women, average age: 37.7 years, follow-up rate: 79 %), six years after ventral thoracoscopic spondylodesis of unstable, incomplete burst fractures. Nine patients received a ventral monosegmental spondylodesis with iliac crest bone graft. The other ten cases were treated dorso-ventrally, five undergoing a ventral monosegmental treatment with iliac crest bone graft; the other five a ventral bisegmental treatment with expandable titanium cage.

Results

The complication rate was 15.7 %, the rate of revision of 10.5 %. No complication was related to the ventral thoracoscopic approach, whereas all of them were related to the iliac crest bone graft. The operative bisegmental kyphotic reduction was higher in the dorso-ventrally treated group. Afterwards, the loss of reduction was similar in both study groups. The mean VAS spine score summed up to more than 80 in both groups. The mean PCS scores were comparable to a normal healthy collective of the same age.

Conclusions

The ventral thoracoscopic approach to the spine seems to be a safe therapeutic strategy. A dorso-ventral treatment concept goes along with a higher operative reduction potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V, Butterman G (2003) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-A(5):773–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A (2005) Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S15–S23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Been HD, Bouma GJ (1999) Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(4):349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, Whitehill R, Wang GJ, Szabo TA, Hansen CA, Shaffrey ME, Chan DP (1995) Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 83(6):977–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Domenicucci M, Preite R, Ramieri A, Ciappetta P, Delfini R, Romanini L (1996) Thoracolumbar fractures without neurosurgical involvement: surgical or conservative treatment? J Neurosurg Sci 40(1):1–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grohs JG, Matzner M, Trieb K, Krepler P (2005) Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(3):238–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knop C, Lange U, Reinhold M, Blauth M (2005) Vertebral body replacement with Synex in combined posteroanterior surgery for treatment of thoracolumbar injuries. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17(3):249–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2-L4) burst fractures. Spine 31(8):859–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasso RC, Renkens K, Hanson D, Reilly T, McGuire RA Jr, Best NM (2006) Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: anterior-only versus short-segment posterior fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(4):242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ, Oner FC (2004) Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine 29(7):803–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ, Rommens PM, ten Duis HJ, Patka P (2006) Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(25):2881–2890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R, Audige L, Kandziora F, Pizanis A, Pranzl R, Gercek E, Schultheiss M, Weckbach A, Buhren V, Blauth M (2009) Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column: part III: follow up data. Der Unfallchirurg 112(3):294–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beisse R, Potulski M, Beger J, Buhren V (2002) Development and clinical application of a thoracoscopy implantable plate frame for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and instabilities. Der Orthopade 31(4):413–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Potulski M, Beisse R, Buhren V (1999) Thoracoscopy-guided management of the “anterior column”. methods and results. Der Orthopade 28(8):723–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasso RC, Best NM, Reilly TM, McGuire RA Jr (2005) Anterior-only stabilization of three-column thoracolumbar injuries. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S7–S14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(15):1741–1744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonschorek O, Spiegl U, Weiss T, Patzold R, Hauck S, Buhren V (2011) Reconstruction after spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar region. Der Unfallchirurg 114(1):26–34. doi:10.1007/s00113-010-1940-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beisse R, Potulski M, Temme C, Buhren V (1998) Endoscopically controlled division of the diaphragm. A minimally invasive approach to ventral management of thoracolumbar fractures of the spine. Der Unfallchirurg 101(8):619–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guilfoyle MR, Seeley H, Laing RJ (2009) The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease—validation against condition-specific measures. Br J Neurosurg 23(4):401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2001) Development and validation of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) spine score. Der Unfallchirurg 104(6):488–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Spiegl U, Hauck S, Merkel P, Buhren V, Gonschorek O (2012) 6-Year follow-up of ventral monosegmental spondylodesis of incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine using three cortical iliac crest bone grafts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(10):1473–1480. doi:10.1007/s00402-012-1576-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1359–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bence T, Schreiber U, Grupp T, Steinhauser E, Mittelmeier W (2007) Two column lesions in the thoracolumbar junction: anterior, posterior or combined approach? A comparative biomechanical in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 16(6):813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wippermann BW, Schratt HE, Steeg S, Tscherne H (1997) Complications of spongiosa harvesting of the ilial crest. A retrospective analysis of 1,191 cases. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 68(12):1286–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BG-Traumacenter Murnau, Traumatology, Murnau, Germany

    Ulrich Spiegl, Stefan Hauck, Patricia Merkel, Volker Bühren & Oliver Gonschorek

  2. Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Spine Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Ulrich Spiegl

Authors
  1. Ulrich Spiegl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Hauck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Merkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Volker Bühren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Oliver Gonschorek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Spiegl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiegl, U., Hauck, S., Merkel, P. et al. Six-year outcome of thoracoscopic ventral spondylodesis after unstable incomplete cranial burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: ventral versus dorso-ventral strategy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1113–1120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1879-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1879-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation