Skip to main content
Log in

Three dimensional-CT evaluation of femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in unilateral DDH in an early walking age group

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

At present, the indications for femoral derotational osteotomy remain controversial due to the inconsistent findings in femoral neck anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Moreover, combined anteversion is not assessed in unilateral DDH using three dimensional-CT. Therefore, the purposes of our study were to observe whether the femoral neck anteversion (FA), acetabular anteversion (AA) and combined anteversion (CA) on the dislocated hips were universally presented in unilateral DDH according to the classification system of Tönnis.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with unilateral dislocation of hip were involved in the study, including 54 females and eight males with a mean age of 21.63 months (range, 18–48 months). The FA, AA and CA were measured and compared between the dislocated hips and the unaffected hips.

Results

Although no significant difference was observed in FA between the dislocated hips and the unaffected hips (P = 0.067, 0.132, respectively) in Tönnis II and III type, FA was obviously increased on the dislocated hips compared with the unaffected hips in Tönnis IV type. Increased AA on the dislocated hips was a universal finding in Tönnis II, III and IV types. Meanwhile, a wide safe range of CA from 24° to 62° was demonstrated on the unaffected hips.

Conclusion

Femoral derotational osteotomy seems not to be necessary in Tönnis II and III types in unilateral DDH. Femoral derotational osteotomy should be considered in DDH, especially in Tönnis IV type, if the CA is still above 62° and the hip joints present instability in operation after abnormal acetabular anteversion, acetabular index and acetabular coverage of the femoral head are recovered to normal range through pelvic osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sewell MD, Eastwood DM (2011) Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip—where do we go from here? Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1257-z

  2. Buckley SL, Sponseller PD, Magid D (1991) The acetabulum in congenital and neuromuscular hip instability. J Pediatr Orthop 11:498–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sankar WN, Neubuerger CO, Moseley CF (2009) Femoral anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 29:885–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG, Allen PD (2006) The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT (2003) Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:263–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bicanic G, Delimar D, Delimar M, Pecina M (2009) Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia. Int Orthop 33:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Browning WH, Rosenkrantz H, Tarquino T (1982) Computed tomography in congenital hip dislocation. The role of acetabular anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:27–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarbana S, Ozturkb A, Tabura H, Isikan UE (2005) Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in early walking age patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 14:410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li LY, Zhang LJ, Zhao Q, Wang EB (2009) Measurement of acetabular anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip in children by two- and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Int Med Res 37:567–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edelson JG, Hirsch M, Weinberg H, Attar D, Barmeir E (1984) Congenital dislocation of the hip and computerised axial tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:472–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SS, Frick SL, Wenger DR (1999) Anteversion of the acetabulum in developmental dysplasia of the hip: analysis with computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 19:438–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Yamamoto T (2010) Acetabular retroversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:895–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T (2006) The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mootha AK, Saini R, Dhillon M (2010) Do we need femoral derotation osteotomy in DDH of early walking age group? A clinico-radiological correlation study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catherine M, Taylor FN, Lee C, Graham HK, Nattrass GR (2002) MRI evaluation of surgical management in developmental dysplasia of hip in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 22:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mootha AK, Saini R, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Kumar V, Tripathy SK (2010) MRI evaluation of femoral and acetabular anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. A study in an early walking age group. Acta Orthop Belg 76:174–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:148–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A (2006) Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 29:1104–1108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tönnis D (1984) Nomenklatur der angeborenen Hüftluxation. In: Die angeborene Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation im Kindes-und Erwachsenenalter. Springer, Berlin, p 86 [in German]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zilber S, Lazennec JY, Gorin M, Saillant G (2004) Variations of caudal, central, and cranial acetabular anteversion according to the tilt of the pelvis. Surg Radiol Anat 26:462–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Bosse HJ, Lee D, Henderson ER, Sala DA, Feldman DS (2011) Pelvic positioning creates error in ct acetabular measurements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1683–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berkeley ME, Dickson JH, Cain TE, Donovan MM (1984) Surgical therapy for congenital dislocation of the hip in patients who are twelve to thirty-six months old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:412–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wenger DR, Lee CS, Kolman B (1995) Derotational femoral shortening for developmental dislocation of the hip: special indications and results in the child younger than 2 years. J Pediatr Orthop 15:768–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zadeh HG, Catterall A, Hashemi-Nejad A, Perry RE (2000) Test of stability as an aid to decide the need of osteotomy in association with open reduction in developmental dislocation of hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, J., Li, L., Zhang, L. et al. Three dimensional-CT evaluation of femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in unilateral DDH in an early walking age group. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 119–124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1337-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1337-0

Keywords

Navigation