Skip to main content
Log in

Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reviewed the results of 17 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties performed with the use of freeze-dried irradiated bone allograft in 15 patients. These allografts were used in conjunction with five Kerboull rings, two steel meshes and ten cemented isolated cups. All the patients have had a follow-up of at least 5 years. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. No revisions were necessary and X-rays confirmed partial or total ingrowth of the allografts. In acetabular revision surgery, hip reconstruction can be successfully treated by freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allografts. Additional studies with longer term follow-up are necessary to confirm this outcome.

Résumé

Nous avons revu les résultats de 17 reprises consécutives de prothèses totales de hanche réalisées chez 15 patients. Nous avons utilisé pour toutes ces reprises des allogreffes lyophilisées irradiées. Ces reprises ont été réalisées de la façon suivante: 5 avec anneaux de Kerboull, 2 avec fonds de cotyle grillagés et 10 cupules cimentées sur lit d’allogreffes. Tous les patients ont été revus avec un minimum de 5 ans et ont été évalués sur le plan clinique et radiographique. Aucune re-révision n’a été nécessaire. L’analyse radiographique a confirmé l’incorporation partielle ou totale de ces allogreffes. La chirurgie de reprise acétabulaire des prothèses totales de hanche, en utilisant ce type d’allogreffes lyophilisées irradiées et rendues inertes chimiquement nous a donné de bons résultats. Une étude à plus long terme sera nécessaire pour déterminer de façon précise le niveau d’incorporation de ces allogreffes et leur devenir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg 55 A:1629–1632

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckley SC, Stockley I, Hamer AJ, Kerry RM (2005) Irradiated allograft bone for acetabular revision surgery: Results at a mean of five years. J Bone Joint Surg 87-B(3):310–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS et al. (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:126–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Lee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Reock NJ, Drabu KJ (2001) Impaction bone grafting using freeze-dried allograft in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garneti N, Davies AP, Smith EJ, Learmonth ID (2003) Medium term results of impaction bone grafting with irradiated allograft bone. J Bone Joint Surg 85-B(Supplement. II):159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamadouche M, Blanchat C, Meunier AP, Kerboull L, Kerboull M (2002) Histological findings in a proximal femoral structural allograft ten years following revision total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A(2):269–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamer A, Stockley I, Elson RA (1999) Changes in allograft bone irradiated at different temperatures J Bone Joint Surg 81(B):342–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamer A, Suvarna SK, Stockley I (1997) Histologic evidence of cortical allograft bone incorporation in revision hip surgery The Journal of Arthroplasty 12(7):785–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassaballa M, Mehandale S, Smith EJ, Learmonth, ID (2006) Use of irradiated bone graft for impaction grafting in acetabular revisions J Bone Joint Surg 88-B(Supplement I):66–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holt GM, Stockley I, Elson RA, Ibbotson C (2001) A comparison of the performance of irradiated and non-irradiated bone graft in hip surgery. Hip 11:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg 89:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurencin C, Khan Y (2006) Bone Graft Substitute Material. http://www.emedicine.com/orthoped/topic611.htm. Last Updated: Dec. 15,2006.

  14. Linder L (2000) Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand 71(6):543–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merle drsquo;Aubigné R (1970) Numerical classification of the function of the hip. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 76(6):371–374

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelissen RG, Bauer TW, Weidenhielm LR, LeGolvan DP, Mikhail WE (1995) Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg 77-A(3):412–422

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pitto RP, Muria GV, Hohmann D (1998) Impaction grafting and acetabular reinforcement in revision hip replacement. Int orthopaedics 22:161–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JM, Buma P (2001) Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years’ experience. Clin Orthop 393:202–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toms A, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH (2004) Impaction bone grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A(9):2050–2060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or non-profit organisation with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Vargas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vargas, B., Caton, J. Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases. International Orthopaedics (SICO 33, 35–39 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0444-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0444-4

Keywords

Navigation