Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcome and life quality after endoprosthetic reconstruction following malignant tumours around the knee

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 1993 and 2002, we treated 43 patients with malignant musculoskeletal tumours of the knee region. All patients had partial resection of the femur or tibia together with endoprosthetic replacement. We were able to follow-up 23 patients with an average follow-up of 30 (12–97) months. Complications occurred in ten cases, of which one was a case of local recurrence. Most of the patients were completely satisfied with their condition, with a decreased walking distance as the only notable restriction. There was no correlation between the functional outcome and life quality assessment and the type of the implanted prosthesis, length of resected bone and type of resection. However, patients with tumours in the distal femur had significantly better functional and life quality outcome than those with a proximal tibial tumour.

Résumé

Entre 1993 et 2002 nous avons traité 43 malades avec une tumeur musculo-squelettique maligne de la région du genou. Tous les malades avaient une résection partielle du fémur ou du tibia avec remplacement prothétique. Nous avons suivi 23 malades avec un délai moyen de 30 (12–97) mois. Des complications se sont produites dans 10 cas dont une récidive locale. La plupart des malades ont été satisfaits du résultat avec un périmètre de marche diminué comme seule restriction notable. Il n’y avait aucune corrélation entre, d’une part les résultats fonctionnels et la qualité de vie et, d’autre part, le type de résection, la longueur de résection osseuse et le type de prothèse implantée. Cependant, les malades avec une tumeur du fémur distal avaient de meilleurs résultats pour la fonction et la qualité de vie que ceux atteints d’une tumeur du tibia proximal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anract P, Missenard G, Jeanrot C, Dubois V, Tomeno B (2001) Knee reconstruction with prosthesis and muscle flap after total arthrectomy. Clin Ortop 384:208–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyle M, Tebbi CK, Mindell ER, Mettlin CJ (1982) Adolescent adjustment to amputation. Med Pediatr Oncol 10:301–312

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enneking WF (1987) Modification of the system for functional evaluation of surgical management of musculoskeletal tumors. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 626–639

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gebhardt MC, Flugstad DI, Spigfield DS, Mankin HJ (1991) The use of bone allograft for limb salvage in high grade extremity osteosarcoma. Clin Ortop 270:181–196

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Sneath RS, Walker PS et al (1999) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:488–494

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris IE, Leff AR, Gitelis S, Simon M (1990) Function after amputation, arthrodesis, or arthroplasty for tumors about the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1477–1483

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hillmann A, Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Krakau H, Winkelmann W (1999) Malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia: endoprosthetic replacement or rotationplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:462–467

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holzer G, Windhager R, Kotz R (1997) One-stage revision surgery for infected megaprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horowitz SM, Lane JM, Otis JC, Healey JH (1991) Prosthetic arthroplasty of the knee after resection of a sarcoma in the proximal end of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:286–293

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ilyas I, Yuonge D, Pant R, Moreau P (2000) Limb salvage for proximal tibial tumours using a modular prosthesis. Int Orthop 24:208–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malawer MM, McHale KA (1989) Limb-sparing surgery for high-grade malignant tumors of the proximal tibia: surgical technique and a method of extensor mechanism reconstruction. Clin Ortop 239:231–248

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT (1991) Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:762–769

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanjay BKS, Moreau PG (1999) Limb salvage surgery in bone tumour with modular endoprosthesis. Int Orthop 23:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szendrői M, Antal I, Kiss J (2003) Howmedica tumor endoportézissel (HMRS) szerzett tapasztalatok. Magy Traumatol Ortop 2:122–129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wirganovicz PZ, Eckhardt JE, Dorey FJ, Eilber FR, Kabo JM (1999) Etiology and results of tumor endoprosthesis revision surgery in 64 patients. Clin Ortop 358:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zwart HJJ, Taminiau AHM, Schimmel JW, Horn JR (1994) Kotz modular femur and tibia replacement: 28 tumor cases followed for 3 (1–8) years. Acta Orthop Scand 65:315–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Skaliczki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skaliczki, G., Antal, I., Kiss, J. et al. Functional outcome and life quality after endoprosthetic reconstruction following malignant tumours around the knee. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 174–178 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0655-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0655-5

Keywords

Navigation