Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with primary liver cancer: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world cohort study

  • Research
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is still no specific real-world data regarding the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the elderly with liver cancer. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors between patients aged ≥ 65 years and the younger group, while exploring their differences in genomic background and tumor microenvironment.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at two hospitals in China and included 540 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for primary liver cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients’ medical records were reviewed for clinical and radiological data and oncologic outcomes. The genomic and clinical data of patients with primary liver cancer were extracted and analyzed from TCGA-LIHC, GSE14520, and GSE140901 datasets.

Results

Ninety-two patients were classified as elderly and showed better progression-free survival (P = 0.027) and disease control rate (P = 0.014). No difference was observed in overall survival (P = 0.69) or objective response rate (P = 0.423) between the two age groups. No significant difference was reported concerning the number (P = 0.824) and severity (P = 0.421) of adverse events. The enrichment analyses indicated that the elderly group was linked to lower expression of oncogenic pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, Wnt, and IL-17. The elderly had a higher tumor mutation burden than younger patients.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that immune checkpoint inhibitors might exhibit better efficacy in the elderly with primary liver cancer, with no increased adverse events. Differences in genomic characteristics and tumor mutation burden may partially explain these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Due to the privacy of patients, the data related to patients cannot be available for public access but can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request approved by the institutional review board of all enrolled centers.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng R, Zhang S, Zeng H, Wang S, Sun K, Chen R et al (2022) Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016. J Natl Cancer Cent 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Villanueva A (2019) Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380:1450–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel A, Martinelli E, Committee EG (2021) Updated treatment recommendations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 32:801–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulik L, El-Serag HB (2019) Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 156:477-491.e471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J et al (2022) Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 23:77–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lian J, Yue Y, Yu W, Zhang Y (2020) Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development. J Hematol Oncol 13:151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurez V, Padron AS, Svatek RS, Curiel TJ (2017) Considerations for successful cancer immunotherapy in aged hosts. Clin Exp Immunol 187:53–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, Xu A, Cang S, Du C et al (2021) Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2–3 study. Lancet Oncol 22:977–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin S, Ren Z, Meng Z, Chen Z, Chai X, Xiong J et al (2020) Camrelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 21:571–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY et al (2020) Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 382:1894–1905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurria A, Levit LA, Dale W, Mohile SG, Muss HB, Fehrenbacher L et al (2015) Improving the evidence base for treating older adults with cancer: American society of clinical oncology statement. J Clin Oncol 33:3826–3833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nemoto Y, Ishihara H, Nakamura K, Tachibana H, Fukuda H, Yoshida K et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 54:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saleh K, Auperin A, Martin N, Borcoman E, Torossian N, Iacob M et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients (>/=70 years) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 157:190–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grossi F, Crinò L, Logroscino A, Canova S, Delmonte A, Melotti B et al (2018) Use of nivolumab in elderly patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the Italian cohort of an expanded access programme. Eur J Cancer 100:126–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perier-Muzet M, Gatt E, Péron J, Falandry C, Amini-Adlé M, Thomas L et al (2018) Association of immunotherapy with overall survival in elderly patients with melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 154:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kugel CH 3rd, Douglass SM, Webster MR, Kaur A, Liu Q, Yin X et al (2018) Age correlates with response to anti-PD1, reflecting age-related differences in intratumoral effector and regulatory T-cell populations. Clin Cancer Res 24:5347–5356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Storm BN, Abedian Kalkhoran H, Wilms EB, Brocken P, Codrington H, Houtsma D et al (2022) Real-life safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in older patients with cancer: an observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 13(7):997–1002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, Topinkova E, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Extermann M et al (2014) International society of geriatric oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:2595–2603

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler HP (2018) Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res 28:1747–1756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Elias R, Giobbie-Hurder A, McCleary NJ, Ott P, Hodi FS, Rahma O (2018) Efficacy of PD-1 & PD-L1 inhibitors in older adults: a meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer 6:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Poropatich K, Fontanarosa J, Samant S, Sosman JA, Zhang B (2017) Cancer immunotherapies: Are they as effective in the elderly? Drugs Aging 34:567–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corbaux P, Maillet D, Boespflug A, Locatelli-Sanchez M, Perier-Muzet M, Duruisseaux M et al (2019) Older and younger patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors have similar outcomes in real-life setting. Eur J Cancer 121:192–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu Q, Wang Q, Tang X, Xu R, Zhang L, Chen X et al (2019) Correlation between patients’ age and cancer immunotherapy efficacy. Oncoimmunology 8:e1568810

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY et al (2020) Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 38:193–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shenoy P, Harugeri A (2015) Elderly patients’ participation in clinical trials. Perspect Clin Res 6:184–189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li R, Zheng C, Wang Q, Bi E, Yang M, Hou J et al (2021) Identification of an immunogenic DKK1 long peptide for immunotherapy of human multiple myeloma. Haematologica 106:838–846

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Cui ML, Chen TY, Xie HY, Cui Y, Tu H et al (2015) Serum DLK1 is a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol 36:8399–8404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pittaway JFH, Lipsos C, Mariniello K, Guasti L (2021) The role of delta-like non-canonical Notch ligand 1 (DLK1) in cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 28:R271-r287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou L, Zhu Y (2018) The EpCAM overexpression is associated with clinicopathological significance and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 56:274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Llovet JM, Castet F, Heikenwalder M, Maini MK, Mazzaferro V, Pinato DJ et al (2022) Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19:151–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma HY, Yamamoto G, Xu J, Liu X, Karin D, Kim JY et al (2020) IL-17 signaling in steatotic hepatocytes and macrophages promotes hepatocellular carcinoma in alcohol-related liver disease. J Hepatol 72:946–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu C, Liu R, Wang B, Lian J, Yao Y, Sun H et al (2021) Blocking IL-17A enhances tumor response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 9

  35. Wu Y, Zhang Y, Qin X, Geng H, Zuo D, Zhao Q (2020) PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway-related long non-coding RNAs: roles and mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pharmacol Res 160:105195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Donnell JS, Massi D, Teng MWL, Mandala M (2018) PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibition in cancer immunotherapy, redux. Semin Cancer Biol 48:91–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chan TA, Yarchoan M, Jaffee E, Swanton C, Quezada SA, Stenzinger A et al (2019) Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic. Ann Oncol 30:44–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gok Yavuz B, Hasanov E, Lee SS, Mohamed YI, Curran MA, Koay EJ et al (2021) Current landscape and future directions of biomarkers for immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 8:1195–1207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Muhammed A, D’Alessio A, Enica A, Talbot T, Fulgenzi CAM, Nteliopoulos G et al (2022) Predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 22:253–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in our study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81972897, 82172751), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M701629), Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (No. 202201011183), and Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. 2022A1515110656).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: LX and LZ; Resources: HD, LX and LL; Investigation and methodology: HC; Data curation: LZ, HZ, JW, QL, and CH; Formal analysis and visualisation: LZ; Validation: RL, and JH; Writing-original draft: LZ, and HZ; Writing-review and editing: LX and YL; Funding acquisition: LL; Supervision: HZ and LL. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Cui, Hanzhi Dong, Lin Zeng or Li Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no confict of interest.

Consent to participate

The need for obtaining informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective study design.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study design was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (approval number: NFEC-2021-048).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1 Volcano plot of DEGs from GSE140901. DEGs, differentially expressed genes (EPS 1936 KB)

262_2023_3417_MOESM2_ESM.eps

Supplementary Fig. 2 (a-c) GO enrichment analyses of the DEGs identified from TCGA-LIHC (a), GSE14520 (b), and GSE140901 (c). (d) The upregulated and downregulated pathways associated with DEGs of KEGG analysis in GSE140901. GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (EPS 10317 KB)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 18 KB)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file5 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, L., Liao, Y., Wang, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with primary liver cancer: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world cohort study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 72, 2299–2308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03417-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03417-3

Keywords

Navigation