Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saloner D. MRA: principles and display. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven Publishers, 1997;1345–1368

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gullberg GT, Wehrli FW, Shimakawa A, et al. MR vascular imaging with a fast gradient refocusing pulse sequence and reformattied images from transaxial sections. Radiology 1987;165:241–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumoulin CL, Cline HE, Souza SP, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spin saturation. Magn Reson Med 1989;11:35–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Owen R, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:627–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortell ED, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. MR angiography of the tibial runoff vessels: imaging with the head coil compared to conventional arteriography. AJR 1996;167:147–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glickerman DJ, Obregon RG, Schmiedl UP, et al. Caridac gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional arteriography. AJR 1996;167:445–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995;26:1753–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson CM. MRA of the aortic arch and extracranial carotid arteries. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven Publishers, 1997;1369–1381

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blatter DD, Parker DL, Robinson RO. Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Radiology 1991;179:805–811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim D, Edelman RR, Kent KC, et al. Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1990;174:727–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Prince MR, et al. Time-of-flight renal MR arteriography: utility in patients with renal insufficiency. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:925–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loubeyre P, Cahen R, Grozel F, et al. Transplant renal artery stenosis. Evaluation of diagnosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with color duplex sonography and arteriography. Transplantation 1996;62(4):446–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR 1996;166:971–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prince MR. Body MR angiography with gadolinium contrast agents. MRI Clin North Am 1996;4(1):11–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryant D, Payne J, Firmin D, et al. Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:588–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gedroyc WMW. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arteries. Urol Clin North Am 1994;21:201–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gedroyc WM, Negus R, Al-Kutoubi A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Lancet 1992;339:789–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bass JC, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries. AJR 1997;168:261–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yucel EK. Magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity and renal arteries. Sem Ultrasound CT MRI 1992;13(4):291–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngheim HV, Winter TC, Mountford MC, et al. Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: value of phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR 1995;164:871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lundin B, Cooper TG, Meyer RA, et al. Measurement of total and unilateral renal blood flow by oblique-angle velocity encoded 2D-CINE magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;11:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoenberg S, Knopp MV, Bock M, et al. MR flow measurements for assessment of different degrees of renal artery stenosis. Fourth scientific meeting and exhibition. New York: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996;164

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, et al. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTAP complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR 1984;142:619–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schima W, Mukerjee A, Saini S. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1996;51(4):235–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldstein HA, Kashanian FK, Blumetti RF, et al. Safety assessment of gadopentetate dimeglumine in U.S. clinical trials. Radiology 1990;174:17–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Niendorf H, Haustein J, Alhassan A, et al. Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience. In: Brasch R, ed. Workshop on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Napa, CA: Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1991:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haustein J, Niendorf HP, Krestin G, et al. Renal tolerance of gadolinium-DTAP/dimeglumine in patients with chronic renal failure. Invest Radiol 1992;27:153–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high dose gadolinium compared to iodinated contrast. JMRI 1996;6:162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC, Bosniak MA, et al. Renal lesion characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: efficacy and safety in patients with renal insufficiency. Radiology 1991;180:85–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hohenschuh E, Watson AD. Contrast media: theory and mechanisms of contrast-enhancing agents. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven Publishers, 1997:1439–1464

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schmiedl U, Brasch RC, Ogan MD, et al. Albumin labeled with Gd-DTPA. Acta Radiol 1990;374(suppl):99–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Hecke P, et al. MR angiography with gadopentetate dimeglumine-polylysine: evaluation in rabbits. AJR 1990;155:407–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bogdanov AA, Weissleder R, Frank HW, et al. A new macromolecule as a contrast agent for MR angiography: preparation, properties, and animal studies. Radiology 1993;187:701–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loubeyre P, Canet E, Zhao S, et al. Carboxymethyl-dextran-gadolinium-DTPA as a blood-pool contrast agent for magnetic resonance angiography. Experimental study in rabbits. Invest Radiol 1996;31:288–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saini S, Edelman RR, Sharma P, et al. Blood-pool MR contrast material for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: initial clinical experience with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (AMI-227). AJR 1995;164:1147–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Anzai Y, Prince MR, Chenevert TL, et al. MR angiography with and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent. JMRI 1997;7:209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brasch RC. New directions in the development of MR imaging contrast media. Radiology 1992;183:1–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, Slater G, et al. MR contrast material for vascular enhancement: value of superparamagnetic iron oxide. AJR 1996;166:73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Benderbous S, Bonnemain B. Supermagnetic nanoparticles as blood-pool contrast agents. Radiologe 1995;35(suppl 2):S248–S252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmiedl U, Sievers RE, Brasch RC, et al. Acute myocardial ischemia and repurfusion: MR imaging with albumin-Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989;170:351–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saeed M, Wendland M, Masui, et al. Myocardial infarction: assessment with an intravascular MR contrast medium. Work in progress. Radiology 1991;180:153–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Berthezene Y, Vexler V, Jerome H, et al. Differentiation of capillary leak and hydrostatic pulmonary edema with a macromolecular MR imaging contrast agent. Radiology 1991;181:773–777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Baxter AB, Melnikoff S, Stites DP, et al. Immunogenicity of gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: induction and characterization of antibodies in animals. Invest Radiol 1991;26:1035–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Hecke P, Marchal G, Bosmans H, et al. NMR imaging study of the pharmacodynamics of polylysine-gadolinium-DTPA in the rabbit and the rat. Magn Reson Imaging 1991;9:313–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McLachlan SJ, Morris MR, Lucas MA, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of a new iron oxide MR contrast agent. JMRI 1994;4:301–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arterography. JMRI 1993;3:877–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Lee C. Contrast-enhance MR angiography. JMRI 1993;3:233–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ehman RL, Revel D, Sievers R, et al. Acute myocardial ischemia. Magnetic resonance contrast enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology 1984;153:157–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Moseley ME, Sawyer AM. Imgaing techniques: pulse sequences. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven Publishers, 1997:43–69

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wehrli FW. Principles of magnetic resonance. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book Publishers, 1992:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785–792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:725–732

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, et al. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;201:569–571

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hendrick RE, Roff U. Image contrast and noise. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging. Chicago, IL: Mosby-Year Book, 1991;135

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weinmann HJ, Laniado M, Mützel W. Pharmacokinetics of Gd-DTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Phsyiol Chem Phys Med NMR 1984;16:167–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. JMRI 1996;6:642–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F. MR flouroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988;8:1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bampton AEH, Riederer SJ, Korin HW. Centric phase-encoding order in three-dimensional MP-RAGE sequences: application to abdominal imaging. JMRI 1992;2:327–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Improved centric phase encoding orders for three-dimensional magnetization-prepared MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:384–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Breen JF, et al. Elliptical spiral phase-encoding order: an optimal, field-of-view-dependent ordering scheme for breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3D MR angioraphy. Radiology 1996;201(P):328–329

    Google Scholar 

  62. Maki JH, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. The effects of incomplete breath-holding on 3D MR image quality. JMRI 1997;7:1132–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Snidow JJ, Aisen AM, Harris VJ, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced and two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995;196:371–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Steiner P, Debatin JF, Romanowski B, et al. Optimization of breath-hold 3D MR pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1996;201(P):201

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Schmidt M, et al. Three-dimensional MR angiography of the renal arteries in a single breath-hold. Radiology 1996;201(P):218

    Google Scholar 

  66. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D contrast MR angiography. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997:16–17

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. Strouse PJ, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Effect of the rate of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration on abdominal vascular and soft-tissue MR imaging enhancement patterns. Radiology 1996;201:809–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, et al. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997;203:109–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, et al. Breath-hold singledose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996;201:705–710

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Krinsky G, Rofsky N, Flyer M, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of acquired arch vessel disease. AJR 1996;167:981–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Foo TKF, Manojkumar S, Prince MR, et al. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;203:275–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wilman AH, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, et al. Flouroscopically-triggered contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR angiography. Paper to be presented at the Fifth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vancouver, Canada, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  73. Levy RA, Maki JH. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries: two techniques. AJNR 1998;19:688–690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Korosec FR, Grist TM, Frayne R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Fourth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. New York: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996:238

    Google Scholar 

  75. Korosec FR, Grist TM, Frayne R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Frayne R, et al. Contrast and motion artifacts in 4D MR angiography. Radiology 1996;201(P):238

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wood ML, Runge VM, Henkelman RM. Overcoming motion in abdominal MR imaging. AJR 1988;150:513–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ehman RL, Felmlee JP. Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structure. Radiology 1989;173:255–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Du YP, Parker DL, Davis WL, et al. Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. JMRI 1994;4:733–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ros PR, Gauger J, Stoupis C, et al. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: feasibility of combining MR angiography, MR renography, and gadopentetate-based measurements of glomerular filtration rate. AJR 1995;165:1447–1451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D contrast MR angiography. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997:26–27

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. Laub G, Displays for MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:222–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rossnick S, Laub G, Braeckle R. Three dimensional display of blood vessels in MRI. Proceedings of the IEEE: computers in cardiology. New York: IEEE, 1986:193–195

    Google Scholar 

  84. Anderson C, Saloner D, Tsuruda J, et al. Artifacts in maximum intensity projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 1990;154:623–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995;165:431–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lee VS, Flyer MA, Weinreb JC, et al. Image subtraction in gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 1996;167:1427–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Prince MR, Shoenberg SO, Ward JS, et al. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997;205:128–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Stafford-Johnson DB, Lerner CA, Prince MR, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Magn Reson Imaging, 1997; 15:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Division of MRI, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 48109-0030, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    J. H. Maki, T. L. Chenevert & M. R. Prince

  2. Department of Radiology (114), Puget Sound Veterans Administration Hospital, 1660 South Columbian Way, 98108, Seattle, WA, USA

    J. H. Maki

Authors
  1. J. H. Maki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. L. Chenevert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. R. Prince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maki, J., Chenevert, T. & Prince, M. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Abdom Imaging 23, 469–484 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900384

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900384

Keywords

Search

Navigation