Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Whole tumor volumetric ADC analysis: relationships with histopathological differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between values obtained from whole tumor volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and histopathological grade in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Fifty-one naïve patients with HCC were included in the study. The tumors were classified according to the Edmondson–Steiner grade and separated as well-differentiated and non-well-differentiated (moderately and poorly differentiated). The ADC parameters of groups were compared by applying Mann–Whitney U test. The correlation between tumors’ histopathological stage and whole tumor ADC parameters was investigated using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) was applied to calculate the area under curve (AUC) with intersection point of ADC parameters and curve.

Results

Mean and percentile ADC values of well-differentiated tumors were significantly higher than those of non-well-differentiated tumors (p < 0.05). The strongest correlation between histopathological grade and ADC parameters was 75th percentile ADC (r = − 0.501), 50th percentile ADC (r = − 0.476) and mean ADC (r = − 0.465). Mean, 75th and 50th percentile ADC values used for the distinction of groups gave the highest AUC at ROC analysis (0.781, 0.781, 0.767, respectively). When threshold values of mean, 75th and 50th percentile ADC values were applied (1516 mm2/s, 1194 mm2/s, and 1035 mm2/s) sensitivity was calculated as 0.73, 0.91, 0.83, respectively, and specificity was calculated as 0.82, 0.61, and 0.68, respectively.

Conclusions

A correlation between whole tumor volumetric ADC values and HCCs’ histopathological grade was detected in this study. 75th percentile, 50th percentile and mean ADC values are determined as highly sensitive and specific tests when the threshold values are applied for distinguishing between well-differentiated tumors and moderately/poorly differentiated tumors. When all these findings are evaluated together, HCCs’ volumetric ADC values might be a useful noninvasive predictive parameters for histopathological grade in patients with HCC.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, El‐Serag HB. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021; 73(S1):4-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kudo M, Trevisani F, Abou-Alfa GK, Rimassa L. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Therapeutic Guidelines and Medical Treatment. Liver Cancer. 2017; 6(1):16-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000449343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colecchia A, Schiumerini R, Cucchetti A, Cescon M, Taddia M, Marasco G, et al. Prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(20):5935-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.5935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Likhitsup A, Parikh ND. Economic Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Treatment: A Guide for Clinicians. PharmacoEconomics. 2020; 38(1):5-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00839-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edmondson HA, Steiner PE. Primary carcinoma of the liver. A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 1954; 7(3):462-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::aid-cncr2820070308>3.0.co;2-e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou L, Rui J-A, Zhou W-X, Wang S-B, Chen S-G, Qu Q. Edmondson-Steiner grade: A crucial predictor of recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma without microvascular invasion. Pathol Res Pract. 2017; 213(7):824-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2017.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taouli B, Koh D-M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology. 2010; 254(1):47-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Granata V, Fusco R, Filice S, Catalano O, Piccirillo M, Palaia R, et al. The current role and future prospectives of functional parameters by diffusion weighted imaging in the assessment of histologic grade of HCC. Infect Agent Cancer. 2018; 13-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-018-0194-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang WC, Chen RC, Chou CT, Lin CY, Yu CY, Liu CH, et al. Histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with arterial enhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Abdom Imaging. 2014; 39(6):1202-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0168-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei Y, Gao F, Wang M, Huang Z, Tang H, Li J, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of three methods for positioning region of interest. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(2):535-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5638-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon H-J, Byun JH, Kim JY, Hong G-S, Won HJ, Shin YM, et al. Differentiation of small (≤2 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas from small benign nodules in cirrhotic liver on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(1):64-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0188-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thust SC, Hassanein S, Bisdas S, Rees JH, Hyare H, Maynard JA, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(9):3779-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrett T, Lawrence EM, Priest AN, Warren AY, Gnanapragasam VJ, Gallagher FA, et al. Repeatability of diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate using whole lesion ADC values, skew and histogram analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2019; 110:22-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bougias H, Ghiatas A, Priovolos D, Veliou K, Christou A. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics as a marker of breast tumour characterization—comparison between ADC value and ADC entropy. Br J Radiol. 2016; 89(1068):20160304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ameli S, Shaghaghi M, Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Pandey P, Hazhirkarzar B, Ghadimi M, et al. Role of baseline volumetric functional MRI in predicting histopathologic grade and patients’ survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(7):3748-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06742-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kudo M, Kitano M, Sakurai T, Nishida N. General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer, Nationwide Follow-Up Survey and Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Outstanding Achievements of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Dig Dis. 2015; 33(6):765-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000439101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moriya T, Saito K, Tajima Y, Harada TL, Araki Y, Sugimoto K, et al. 3D analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient histograms in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grade. Cancer Imaging. 2017; 17(1):1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0103-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu Y-S, Liu H-F, Xi D-L, Li J-K, Liu Z, Yan R-F, et al. Whole-lesion histogram analysis metrics of the apparent diffusion coefficient: a correlation study with histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol. 2019; 44(9):3089-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02109-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Woo S, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade. Acta Radiol. 2014; 55(10):1270-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/​0284185113514967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Metens T, Absil J, Denolin V, Bali MA, Matos C. Liver apparent diffusion coefficient repeatability with individually predetermined optimal cardiac timing and artifact elimination by signal filtering. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 43(5):1100-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wirestam R, Borg M, Brockstedt S, Lindgren A, Holtas S, Stahlberg F. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique. Acta Radiol 2001; 42(2): 123–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey

    Ferhat Can Piskin, Huseyin Tugsan Balli, Sinan Sozutok & Kairgeldy Aikimbaev

  2. Department of Pathology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey

    Kivilcim Eren Erdoğan

Authors
  1. Ferhat Can Piskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huseyin Tugsan Balli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kivilcim Eren Erdoğan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sinan Sozutok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kairgeldy Aikimbaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferhat Can Piskin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piskin, F.C., Balli, H.T., Erdoğan, K.E. et al. Whole tumor volumetric ADC analysis: relationships with histopathological differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol 46, 5180–5189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03240-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03240-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation