Skip to main content
Log in

The efficiency of susceptibility-weighted MRI in the differentiation of endometriomas from haemorrhagic ovarian cysts

  • Pelvis
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficiency of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (SWIs) in differentiating endometriomas from haemorrhagic ovarian cysts.

Materials and methods

Between July 2017 and January 2019, 89 ovarian cystic lesions (57 endometriomas and 32 haemorrhagic cysts) that were identified as complicated cystic lesions on ultrasonography (US) and underwent lower abdominal MRI with susceptibility weighting were retrospectively evaluated. Final diagnoses were obtained with surgical pathological correlation and radiological-clinical follow-up. Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnoses retrospectively reviewed the images in consensus. The signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images and curved linear or punctate signal void areas on SWI were noted for the presence of lesions.

Results

Forty of the 57 endometriomas demonstrated the defined MRI criteria, including a cystic hyperintensity on T1-weighted images and hypointensity on T2-weighted images. The remaining 17 lesions did not demonstrate these criteria on conventional MR images. SWI showed punctate or curved linear signal void areas in 53 of 57 endometriomas (92.9%) and none of the haemorrhagic cysts. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWI in differentiating endometrioma from haemorrhagic cyst were 92.9%, 100.0%, and 95.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

The addition of the SWI sequence to conventional MRI can help distinguish endometriomas from haemorrhagic ovarian cysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24:235–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jenkins S, Olive DL, Haney AF. Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:335-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Olive DL, Schwartz LB. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1759–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heidemann LN, Hartwell D, Heidemann CH, Jochumsen KM. The relation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer—a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T, et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180:73–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, Nishitani H. Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2006;26:407–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosai J. Ovary. In: Ackerman’s surgical pathology, 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1996:1461–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, Tong KA, Wycliffe N, Kido DK, et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility- weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:439–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haddar D, Haacke EM, Sloan AE, Zamorano LJ, et al. Susceptibility- weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olive DL, Pritts EA. Treatment of endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2001;345:266–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balaban M, Idilman IS, Toprak H, Unal O, Ipek A, Kocakoc E. The utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of endometriomas from hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. Clin Imaging. 2015;39:830-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain KA. Sonographic spectrum of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:879-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischer AC, James AE, Millis JB, Julian C. Differential diagnosis of pelvic masses by gray scale sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;131:469–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boos J, Brook OR, Fang J, Brook A, Levine D. Ovarian Cancer: Prevalence in Incidental Simple Adnexal Cysts Initially Identified in CT Examinations of the Abdomen and Pelvis. Radiology. 2018;286:196-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Biggs WS, Marks ST. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:676-81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP Jr. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001;21:193–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glastonbury CM. The shading sign. Radiology 2002;224:199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee NK, Kim S, Kim KH, Suh DS, Kim TU, Han GJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts in the ovary. Acta Radiol. 2016;57:998-1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Susceptibility-weighted MRI of endometrioma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(5):1366-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brosens I, Puttemans P, Campo R, Gordts S, Brosens J. Non-invasive methods of diagnosis of endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:519–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanso HN, Hachem K, Aoun NJ, Haddad-Zebouni S, Klein-Tomb L, Atallah D, et al. Variable MR findings in ovarian functional hemorrhagic cysts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:356–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Outwater EK, Dunton CJ. Imaging of the ovary and adnexa: clinical issues and applications of MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cansu A, Bulut E, Dinc G, Bekircavusoglu S, Eyuboglu I, Guven ES, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of T2 Dark Spot, T2 Dark Rim Signs, and T2 Shading on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Endometriomas From Hemorrhagic Cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43:619-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee YR. CT imaging findings of ruptured ovarian endometriotic cysts: emphasis on the differential diagnosis with ruptured ovarian functional cysts. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eser Bulut.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulut, E., Peker, M., Kupeli, A. et al. The efficiency of susceptibility-weighted MRI in the differentiation of endometriomas from haemorrhagic ovarian cysts. Abdom Radiol 46, 5337–5343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03196-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03196-4

Keywords

Navigation