Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Abdominal Radiology fellowship website content and comprehensiveness

  • Practice
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Fellowship programs’ online content plays a key role in prospective Abdominal Radiology applicants’ evaluation of programs. The purpose of this study is to examine the online accessibility of Abdominal Radiology fellowships, the comprehensiveness of the program websites’ content, and evaluate whether specific program characteristics are associated with differentiated website comprehensiveness.

Methods

A list of 67 Abdominal Radiology fellowship programs was obtained from the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) website. Each of the 65 publicly-available fellowship websites was scored for the presence of 19 binary variables related to the program’s attributes and curriculum to assess informational comprehensiveness. Comprehensiveness scores were compared by program characteristics (accreditation status, region, and size) using Kruskal–Wallis and two-tailed t tests.

Results

Mean comprehensiveness score of Abdominal Radiology fellowship websites as measured by online criteria met was 52.6% (10.0 ± 3.0/19). Application requirements and information, rotation scheduling, and program director contact were found on more than 87.5% of the 65 websites, whereas salary and benefits, social information, and alumni were listed on fewer than 33.8% (22/65) of websites. Program accreditation status, region, and size were not associated with difference in mean comprehensiveness scores.

Conclusions

There is a discrepancy between information commonly sought by prospective Abdominal Radiology fellowship applicants and what is available on fellowship program websites. Programs and applicants alike may benefit from programs strengthening their online material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charalel RA, Pua BB, Galla N, Trehan SK, Madoff DC (2016) Interventional radiology fellowship website content: what is the relevance to potential applicants? Clin Imaging 40(6):1070–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Radiology SoA Fellowship Training Positions in Abdominal Radiology. https://www.abdominalradiology.org. Accessed May 2018

  3. Svider PF, Gupta A, Johnson AP, Zuliani G, Shkoukani MA, Eloy JA, Folbe AJ (2014) Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(10):956–960. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silvestre J, Tomlinson-Hansen S, Fosnot J, Taylor JA (2014) Plastic surgery residency websites: a critical analysis of accessibility and content. Ann Plast Surg 72(3):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000000125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skovrlj B, Silvestre J, Ibeh C, Abbatematteo JM, Mocco J (2015) Neurosurgery residency websites: a critical evaluation. World Neurosurg 84(3):727–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oladeji LO, Yu JC, Oladeji AK, Ponce BA (2015) How useful are orthopedic surgery residency web pages? J Surg Educ 72(6):1185–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansberry DR, Bornstein J, Agarwal N, McClure KE, Deshmukh SP, Long S (2018) An assessment of radiology residency program websites. J Am Coll Radiol 15(4):663–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Novin S, Yi PH, Vanderplas T, Yim D, Hong K (2018) Integrated interventional radiology residency program websites: a development in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211(1):211–216. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.19008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu LF, Young CA, Zamora AK, Lowe D, Hoang DB, Pearl RG, Macario A (2011) Self-reported information needs of anesthesia residency applicants and analysis of applicant-related web sites resources at 131 United States training programs. Anesth Analg 112(2):430–439. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182027a94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Program NRM (2018) Radiology Match. http://www.nrmp.org/fellowships/radiology-match/. Accessed May 2018

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack H. Ruddell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruddell, J.H., Hartley-Blossom, Z.J., Bajaj, A.I. et al. Analysis of Abdominal Radiology fellowship website content and comprehensiveness. Abdom Radiol 44, 1601–1605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1861-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1861-0

Keywords

Navigation