Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of diagnostic performance between 1 millisievert CT enterography and half-standard dose CT enterography for evaluating active inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of CT enterography (CTE) images obtained at 1 millisievert (mSv) and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with those of half-dose CTE images for the evaluation of active inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients (mean age 29 years; range 15–59 years) with Crohn’s disease underwent CTE which comprised a standard-dose scan at the enteric phase (45 s), a half-dose scan with ASIR at the portal venous phase (70 s), and 1 mSv scans with FBP and ASIR at the delayed phase (90 s) under a fixed 120 kVp and variable mAs. Two blinded readers independently recorded confidence scores for active inflammation in the ileum and terminal ileum, respectively. The diagnostic performance of each image set was compared by pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. The established image findings on standard-dose scan and ileocolonoscopy served as the reference standard.

Results

A total of 92 bowel segments were analyzed. For reader 1, the diagnostic performance was increased from 1 mSv CT with FBP and 1 mSv CT with ASIR to half-dose scan with ASIR (AUC, 0.759, 0.794, and 0.845; P = 0.1429, P = 0.0107, respectively). For reader 2, there was no significant difference among the three image sets (AUC, 0.848, 0.865, and 0.845; P > 0.05, respectively).

Conclusions

The diagnostic performance of 1 mSv CTE may be comparable to that of half-dose CTE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, et al. (2011) Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol 196:W743–W752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlinger K, Gyorke T, Mako E, et al. (2000) The epidemiology and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol 35:154–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loftus EV Jr (2004) Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 126:1504–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, et al. (2010) Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn’s disease: impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol 195:78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ippolito D, Lombardi S, Trattenero C, et al. (2016) CT enterography: diagnostic value of 4th generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in low dose studies in comparison with standard dose protocol for follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 85:268–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. (2011) A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. Am J Roentgenol 197:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park MJ, Lim JS (2013) Computed tomography enterography for evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Endosc 46:327–336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, et al. (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1240–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill SB, McLaughlin PD, Crush L, et al. (2013) A prospective feasibility study of sub-millisievert abdominopelvic CT using iterative reconstruction in Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 23:2503–2512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy KP, Crush L, Twomey M, et al. (2015) Model-based iterative reconstruction in CT enterography. Am J Roentgenol 205:1173–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandhi NS, Baker ME, Goenka AH, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of CT enterography for active inflammatory terminal ileal Crohn disease: comparison of full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with FBP and half-dose images with SAFIRE. Radiology 280:436–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor SA, Avni F, Cronin CG, et al. (2017) The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol 27:2570–2582. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4615-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:2–4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shim HS, Kim SH, Yoon JH, et al. (2014) Postoperative low-dose follow-up computed tomography for patients with stomach cancer: optimal blending ratio of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Booya F, Fletcher JG, Huprich JE, et al. (2006) Active Crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography. Radiology 241:787–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, et al. (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 26:641–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, et al. (2006) Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 55:1561–1567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Craig O, O’Neill S, O’Neill F, et al. (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography using lower doses of radiation for patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:886–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim C, Park SH, Yang SK, et al. (2016) Endoscopic complete remission of Crohn disease after anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy: CT enterographic findings and their clinical implications. Am J Roentgenol 206:1208–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Ho Kim.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Son, J.H., Kim, S.H., Cho, E.Y. et al. Comparison of diagnostic performance between 1 millisievert CT enterography and half-standard dose CT enterography for evaluating active inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Abdom Radiol 43, 1558–1566 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1359-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1359-1

Keywords

Navigation