Skip to main content
Log in

Improved diagnosis of common bile duct stone with single-shot balanced turbo field-echo sequence in MRCP

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the value of adding single-shot balanced turbo field-echo (b-TFE) sequence to conventional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the detection of common bile duct (CBD) stone.

Methods

One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients with suspected CBD stone underwent MRCP including single-shot b-TFE sequence. Twenty-five patients were confirmed with CBD stone by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or ultrasonography. Two radiologists reviewed two image protocols: protocol A (conventional MRCP protocol: unenhanced T1-, T2-, and respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fat-suppressed single-shot turbo spin-echo MRCP sequence) and protocol B (protocol A plus single-shot b-TFE sequence). The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the detection of CBD stone were compared.

Results

The sensitivity (72%) and NPV (94%) were the same between the two protocols. However, protocol B was greater in the specificity (99%) and PPV (94%) than protocol A (92% and 67%, respectively) (P = 0.0078 and 0.031, respectively). The AUC was significantly greater for protocol B (0.93) than for protocol A (0.86) (P = 0.026).

Conclusions

Inclusion of single-shot b-TFE sequence to conventional MRCP significantly improved the specificity and PPV for the detection of CBD stone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsunoda K, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K (2004) Prevalence of cholesterol gallstones positively correlates with per capita daily calorie intake. Hepato-gastroenterology 51(59):1271–1274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caddy GR, Tham TC (2006) Gallstone disease: symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(6):1085–1101. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2006.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. (2003) The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 90(1):42–47. doi:10.1002/bjs.4025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyazaki M, Isoda H (2011) Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen. Eur J Radiol 80(1):9–23. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Itatani R, Namimoto T, Takaoka H, et al. (2015) Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist. Tomogr 39(1):19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148(3):839–843. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. (1998) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 209(2):435–442. doi:10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN (1994) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(4):847–850. doi:10.2214/ajr.163.4.8092021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T (1996) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(6):1441–1445. doi:10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al. (1997) Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 205(2):523–530. doi:10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 199(1):91–98. doi:10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44(1):118–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Glockner JF, Saranathan M, Bayram E, Lee CU (2013) Breath-held MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 31(8):1263–1270. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.06.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandelia A, Gupta AK, Verma DK, Sharma S (2013) The value of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Diagn Res 7(9):1941–1945. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6158.3365

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprinkart AM, Luetkens JA, Traber F, et al. (2015) Gradient Spin Echo (GraSE) imaging for fast myocardial T2 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:12. doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0127-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Goshima.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noda, Y., Goshima, S., Kojima, T. et al. Improved diagnosis of common bile duct stone with single-shot balanced turbo field-echo sequence in MRCP. Abdom Radiol 42, 1183–1188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0990-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0990-6

Keywords

Navigation