Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new method for TIPS follow-up

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the detection of TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) complications.

Materials and method

67 cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS between 2001 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-two vascular examinations in 37 patients for suspicion of TIPS dysfunction based on the clinical or radiological criteria were analyzed and compared with the 62 related Doppler and CEUS examinations obtained previously. Abnormal CEUS was defined as poor opacification of the prosthesis compared to the native portal vein, stent stenosis, hepatic vein stenosis, and occlusion of the stent.

Results

Among the 62 vascular examinations, 56 were considered as pathologic, including: 20 occlusions, 25 stent stenoses, 9 hepatic vein stenoses, 1 arterial-TIPS fistula, and 1 strong flow stealing through a voluminous paraumbilical vein associated with a patent shunt. 50 were exactly correlated with a previous CEUS examination, including 20/20 occlusions (100%), 23/25 stent stenoses (91%), 5/9 hepatic vein stenoses (56%), 1/1 fistula (100%), and 1/1 strong flow stealing (100%). Two CEUS and 14 Doppler examinations were false negative.

Conclusion

CEUS allows direct visualization of intra-prosthetic flow, with a qualitative and anatomic study, in addition to the Doppler examination. This is a new, simple, and effective technique for TIPS follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter GM, Noeldge G, Palmaz JC, et al. (1990) Transjugular intrahepatic portacaval stent shunt: preliminary clinical results. Radiology 174:1027–1030

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer TD (2008) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of complications of portal hypertension. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilbao JI, Quiroga J, Herrero JI, Benito A (2002) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): current status and future possibilities. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 25:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rossle M, Deibert P, Haag K, et al. (1997) Randomised trial of transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt versus endoscopy plus propranolol for prevention of variceal rebleeding. Lancet 349:1043–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochs A, Rossle M, Haag K, et al. (1995) The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for refractory ascites. N Engl J Med 332:1192–1197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cura M, Cura A, Suri R, et al. (2008) Causes of TIPS dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1751–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ducoin H, El-Khoury J, Rousseau H, et al. (1997) Histopathologic analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 25:1064–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Latimer J, Bawa SM, Rees CJ, et al. (1998) Patency and reintervention rates during routine TIPSS surveillance. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 21:234–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanley AJ, Jalan R, Forrest EH, et al. (1996) Longterm follow up of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) for the treatment of portal hypertension: results in 130 patients. Gut 39:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Benito A, Bilbao J, Hernandez T, et al. (2004) Doppler ultrasound for TIPS: does it work? Abdom Imaging 29:45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chong WK, Malisch TA, Mazer MJ, et al. (1993) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: US assessment with maximum flow velocity. Radiology 189:789–793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Longo JM, Bilbao JI, Rousseau HP, et al. (1993) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: evaluation with Doppler sonography. Radiology 186:529–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lafortune M, Martinet JP, Denys A, et al. (1995) Short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: a Doppler/manometric correlative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:997–1002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foshager MC, Ferral H, Nazarian GK, et al. (1995) Duplex sonography after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): normal hemodynamic findings and efficacy in predicting shunt patency and stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dodd GD, 3rd, Zajko AB, Orons PD et al. (1995) Detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: value of duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1119–1124

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feldstein VA, Patel MD, LaBerge JM (1996) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: accuracy of Doppler US in determination of patency and detection of stenoses. Radiology 201:141–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanterman RY, Darcy MD, Middleton WD, et al. (1997) Doppler sonography findings associated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:467–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Owens CA, Bartolone C, Warner DL, et al. (1998) The inaccuracy of duplex ultrasonography in predicting patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Gastroenterology 114:975–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Owens CA (1998) Ultrasound surveillance of tips-why bother? Gastroenterology 114:1433–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zizka J, Elias P, Krajina A, et al. (2000) Value of Doppler sonography in revealing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction: a 5-year experience in 216 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:141–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carrafiello G (2006) Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography in classifying endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysms: preliminary experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:969–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clevert D-A (2007) Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT. Eur Radiol 17:2991–3000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilbao JI, Elorz M, Vivas I, et al. (2004) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of venous symptomatic chronic portal thrombosis in non-cirrhotic patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 27:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lencioni R (2002) Tissue harmonic and contrast-specific imaging: back to gray scale in ultrasound. Eur Radiol 12:151–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lau CT, Scott M, Stavropoulos SW, et al. (2005) Dacron-covered stent-grafts in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: initial experience. Radiology 236:725–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Foshager MC, Ferral H, Finlay DE, et al. (1994) Color Doppler sonography of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS). AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:105–111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uggowitzer MM, Kugler C, Machan L, et al. (1998) Value of echo-enhanced Doppler sonography in evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1041–1046

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Furst G, Malms J, Heyer T, et al. (1998) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: improved evaluation with echo-enhanced color Doppler sonography, power Doppler sonography, and spectral duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1047–1054

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Phillips P, Gardner E (2004) Contrast-agent detection and quantification. Eur Radiol 14(suppl 8):P4–P10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martegani A, Aiani L, Borghi C (2004) The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in large vessels. Eur Radiol 14(suppl 8):P73–P86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Hôpital E Herriot, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France

    Capucine Micol, Julien Marsot & Frank Pilleul

  2. Department of Medical Information and Research Evaluation, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France

    Nawele Boublay

  3. Department of Radiology, Hôpital Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France

    Yves Berthezene & Agnès Rode

Authors
  1. Capucine Micol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julien Marsot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nawele Boublay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frank Pilleul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yves Berthezene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Agnès Rode
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnès Rode.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Micol, C., Marsot, J., Boublay, N. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new method for TIPS follow-up. Abdom Imaging 37, 252–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9763-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9763-4

Key words

Search

Navigation