Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses: imaging and clinical observations

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to review the CT findings and clinical outcome in patients with incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses.

Materials and methods

Over an 8-year period, from 2001 to 2009, we identified 24 patients with solid pancreatic masses incidentally detected by CT. There were 13 females and 11 males, with a mean age of 67 years. We determined the indication for initial CT, analyzed the CT features, and ascertained the clinical follow-up in all the patients.

Results

All of the solid masses were malignant. There were 14 adenocarcinomas and 10 neuroendocrine tumors. The most common indications for the initial CT were surveillance of an extrapancreatic malignancy (n = 10) and evaluation for hematuria (n = 6). On the initial CT, 16 of the patients (67%) had a clearly visible pancreatic mass. In eight patients isoattenuating masses were identified, only recognized by subtle signs including unexplained dilatation of the pancreatic duct (n = 5) or minimal contour deformity or density of the pancreas (n = 3). The mean survival time for the patients with adenocarcinoma was 21.6 months, and 42 months for the patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Conclusion

Although uncommon, incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses are malignant neoplasms, either ductal adenocarcinomas or neuroendocrine tumors. Unlike incidentally discovered small cystic lesions, solid pancreatic lesions are often biologically aggressive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. (2008) Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(3):802–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edirimanne S, Connor SJ (2008) Incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. World J Surg 32(9):2028–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg; 138(4):427–433 (discussion 433-434)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bose D, Tamm E, Liu J, et al. (2010) Multidisciplinary management strategy for incidental cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 211(2):205–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gangi S, Fletcher JG, Nathan MA, et al. (2004) Time interval between abnormalities seen on ct and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: retrospective review of ct scans obtained before diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:897–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sachs T, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2009) The incidental asymptomatic pancreatic lesion: nuisance or threat? J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):405–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruzoni M, Johnston E, Sasson AR (2008) Pancreatic incidentalomas: clinical and pathologic spectrum. Am J Surg 195(3):329–332 (discussion 332)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgerald TL, Smith AJ, Ryan M, et al. (2003) Surgical treatment of incidentally identified pancreatic masses. Can J Surg 46(6):413–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. (2006) Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution’s experience with an increasingly common diagnosis. Ann Surg 243(5):673–680 (discussion 680-683)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lahat G, Ben Haim M, Nachmany I, et al. (2009) Pancreatic incidentalomas: high rate of potentially malignant tumors. J Am Coll Surg 209(3):313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr (1995) Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 195(2):359–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boland GW, O’Malley ME, Saez M, et al. (1999) Pancreatic-phase versus portal vein-phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(3):605–608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. (2007) MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(3):751–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224(3):764–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeshita K, Kutomi K, Haruyama T, et al. (2010) Imaging of early pancreatic cancer on multidetector row helical CT. Br J Radiol 83(994):823–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Brooke Jeffrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, M., Willmann, J.K. & Jeffrey, R.B. Incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses: imaging and clinical observations. Abdom Imaging 37, 91–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9720-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9720-2

Keywords

Navigation