Skip to main content
Log in

Small bowel obstruction due to an impacted endoscopy capsule

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE), a recently introduced technology, offers important benefits for evaluation of small bowel pathology as compared to traditional radiologic and endoscopic studies. The most striking complication of this modality is capsule retention, which may obligate invasive retrieval. The radiologist should be aware of the natural course, presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options for this retained foreign body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazzarolo S, Brady P (2007) Small bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review South Med J 100:274–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Chiorean M, et al. (2007) Radiologic investigations complement and add diagnostic information to capsule endoscopy of small-bowel diseases AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:306–312 (Editorial)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho KK, Joyce AM (2007) Complications of capsule endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 17:169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheifetz AS, Lewis BS (2006) Capsule endoscopy retention: is it a complication? J Clin Gastroenterol 40:688–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spada C, Riccioni ME, Costamagna G (2007) Patients with known small bowel stricture or with symptoms of small bowel obstruction secondary to Crohn’s disease should not perform video capsule endoscopy without being previously tested for small bowel patency Am J Gastroenterol 102:1542–1543 author reply 1543–1544 (Letter to Editor)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin OS, Brandabur JJ, Schembre DB, et al. (2007) Acute symptomatic small bowel obstruction due to capsule impaction. Gastrointest Endosc 65:725–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Picazo-Yeste J, Gonzalez-Carro P, Moreno-Sanz C, et al. (2006) Intestinal perforation secondary to impaction of a retained endoscopic capsule Cir Esp 79:316–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka S, Mitsui K, Shirakawa K, et al. (2006) Successful retrieval of video capsule endoscopy retained at ileal stenosis of Crohn’s disease using double-balloon endoscopy J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:922–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dominguez EP, Choi Y, Raijman IL, et al. (2006) Laparoscopic approach for the retrieval of retained video capsule endoscopy JSLS 10:496–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang PK, Holt EG, De Villiers WJ, et al. (2005) A new complication from a new technology: what a general surgeon should know about wireless capsule endoscopy Am Surg 71:455–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moglia A, Menciassi A, Schurr MO, et al. (2007) Wireless capsule endoscopy: from diagnostic devices to multipurpose robotic systems Biomed Microdevices 9:235–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank A. Rosario for providing the demonstration capsule for photography/radiography and A. Worrell for providing technical assistance in radiographing the capsule.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Levsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levsky, J.M., Milikow, D.L., Rozenblit, A.M. et al. Small bowel obstruction due to an impacted endoscopy capsule. Abdom Imaging 33, 579–581 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9350-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9350-x

Keywords

Navigation