Skip to main content
Log in

SPECT at the speed of PET: a feasibility study of CZT-based whole-body SPECT/CT in the post 177Lu-DOTATATE and 177Lu-PSMA617 setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using the StarGuide (General Electric Healthcare, Haifa, Israel), a new generation multi-detector cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-based SPECT/CT, for whole-body imaging in the setting of post-therapy imaging of 177Lu-labeled radiopharmaceuticals.

Methods

Thirty-one patients (34–89 years old; mean ± SD, 65.5 ± 12.1) who were treated with either 177Lu-DOTATATE (n=17) or 177Lu-PSMA617 (n=14) as part of standard of care were scanned post-therapy with the StarGuide; some were also scanned with the standard GE Discovery 670 Pro SPECT/CT. All patients had either 64Cu-DOTATATE or 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to first cycle of therapy for eligibility check. The detection/targeting rate (lesion uptake greater than blood pool uptake) of large lesions meeting RECIST 1.1 size criteria on post-therapy StarGuide SPECT/CT was evaluated and compared to the standard design GE Discovery 670 Pro SPECT/CT (when available) and pre-therapy PET by two nuclear medicine physicians with consensus read.

Results

This retrospective analysis identified a total of 50 post-therapy scans performed with the new imaging protocol from November 2021 to August 2022. The StarGuide system acquired vertex to mid-thighs post-therapy SPECT/CT scans with 4 bed positions, 3 min/bed and a total scan time of 12 min. In comparison, the standard GE Discovery 670 Pro SPECT/CT system typically acquires images in 2 bed positions covering the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with a total scan time of 32 min. The pre-therapy 64Cu-DOTATATE PET takes 20 min with 4 bed positions on GE Discovery MI PET/CT, and 18F-DCFPyL PET takes 8–10 min with 4–5 bed positions on GE Discovery MI PET/CT. This preliminary evaluation showed that the post-therapy scans acquired with faster scanning time using StarGuide system had comparable detection/targeting rate compared to the Discovery 670 Pro SPECT/CT system and detected large lesions defined by RECIST criteria on the pre-therapy PET scans.

Conclusion

Fast acquisition of whole-body post-therapy SPECT/CT is feasible with the new StarGuide system. Short scanning time improves the patients’ clinical experience and compliance which may lead to increased adoption of post-therapy SPECT. This opens the possibility to offer imaged-based treatment response assessment and personalized dosimetry to patients referred for targeted radionuclide therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Yes.

Code availability

Yes.

References

  1. Israel O, Pellet O, Biassoni L, De Palma D, Estrada-Lobato E, Gnanasegaran G, et al. Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: an updated review of literature evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1990–2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cherry SRS, James A, Phelps ME. Hybrid imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT: W.B: Saunders; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seo Y, Mari C, Hasegawa BH. Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:177–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. IAEA. IMAGINE - IAEA Medical imAGIng and Nuclear mEdicine global resources database https://humanhealthiaeaorg/HHW/DBStatistics/IMAGINEhtml. Accessed 1 Oct 2022 

  5. Grubmuller B, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Fajkovic H, D'Andrea D, Berndl F, et al. Response assessment using [(68) Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2020;80:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gafita A, Rauscher I, Weber M, Hadaschik B, Wang H, Armstrong WR, et al. Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1651–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungberg M, Pretorius PH. SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20160402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritt P. Recent developments in SPECT/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52:276–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging guidelines: instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1784–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wacholz CH, Carrie ; OConnor, and Michael. Veriton multi-CZT detector SPECT/CT system acceptance testing. J Nucl Med 2020;61:3003.

  12. Desmonts C, Bouthiba MA, Enilorac B, Nganoa C, Agostini D, Aide N. Evaluation of a new multipurpose whole-body CzT-based camera: comparison with a dual-head Anger camera and first clinical images. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Imbert L, Chevalier E, Claudin M, Karcher G, Verger A, Paycha F, Marie PY. A one-shot whole-body bone SPECT may be recorded in less than 20 minutes with the high-sensitivity Veriton® CZT-camera. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1288.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. Phase 3 trial of (177) Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sgouros G, Dewaraja YK, Escorcia F, Graves SA, Hope TA, Iravani A, et al. Tumor response to radiopharmaceutical therapies: the knowns and the unknowns. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:12S–22S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandit-Taskar N, Iravani A, Lee D, Jacene H, Pryma D, Hope T, et al. Dosimetry in clinical radiopharmaceutical therapy of cancer: practicality versus perfection in current practice. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:60S–72S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. GE Medical Systems Israel FI, GE Healthcare. FDA 510(k) premarket notification submission - StarGuide. https://www.accessdatafdagov/cdrh_docs/pdf21/K210173pdf. 2021:5-6. Accessed 1 Oct 2022

  19. Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Macpherson RE, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Phantom and Clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1447–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Benabdallah N, Scheve W, Dunn N, Silvestros D, Schelker P, Abou D, et al. Practical considerations for quantitative clinical SPECT/CT imaging of alpha particle emitting radioisotopes. Theranostics. 2021;11:9721–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Esquinas PL, Rodriguez-Rodriguez C, Esposito TVF, Harboe J, Bergamo M, Celler A, et al. Dual SPECT imaging of (111) In and (67) Ga to simultaneously determine in vivo the pharmacokinetics of different radiopharmaceuticals: a quantitative tool in pre-clinical research. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:235029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Erdi YE. Limits of tumor detectability in nuclear medicine and PET. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012;21:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ito T, Matsusaka Y, Onoguchi M, Ichikawa H, Okuda K, Shibutani T, et al. Experimental evaluation of the GE NM/CT 870 CZT clinical SPECT system equipped with WEHR and MEHRS collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22:165–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lebtahi R, Cadiot G, Sarda L, Daou D, Faraggi M, Petegnief Y, et al. Clinical impact of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the management of patients with neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:853–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Le Rouzic G, Zananiri R. First performance measurements of a new multi-detector CZT-Based SPECT/CT system: GE StarGuide. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1125.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uribe C, Peterson A, Van B, Fedrigo R, Carlson J, Sunderland J, et al. An international study of factors affecting variability of dosimetry calculations, part 1: design and early results of the SNMMI dosimetry challenge. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:36S–47S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Capala J, Graves SA, Scott A, Sgouros G, James SS, Zanzonico P, et al. Dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapy: current practices and commercial resources. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:3S–11S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Violet J, Jackson P, Ferdinandus J, Sandhu S, Akhurst T, Iravani A, et al. Dosimetry of (177) Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: correlations between pretherapeutic imaging and whole-body tumor dosimetry with treatment outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:517–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fendler WP, Reinhardt S, Ilhan H, Delker A, Boning G, Gildehaus FJ, et al. Preliminary experience with dosimetry, response and patient reported outcome after 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pathmanandavel S, Crumbaker M, Ho B, Yam AO, Wilson P, Niman R, et al. Evaluation of (177) Lu-PSMA SPECT quantitation as a response biomarker within a prospective (177) Lu-PSMA-617 and NOX66 combination trial (LuPIN). J Nucl Med. 2022;64:221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HS: content planning, data analyses, manuscript writing and editing. VF: data analyses, manuscript editing. HD: data analyses, manuscript editing. CMA: manuscript editing. GD: manuscript editing. BLF: manuscript editing. FM: data analyses, manuscript editing. JN: manuscript editing. JS: manuscript editing. AI: content planning, data analyses, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Iagaru.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Yes.

Consent to participate

Yes.

Consent for publication

Yes.

Competing interests

AI is an unpaid consultant to GE Healthcare. Hong Song, Valentina Ferri, Heying Duan, Carina Mari Aparici, Guido Davidzon, Benjamin L. Franc, Farshad Moradi, Judy Nguyen, and Jagruti Shah declare that they have no conflict or competing of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Theragnostic.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, H., Ferri, V., Duan, H. et al. SPECT at the speed of PET: a feasibility study of CZT-based whole-body SPECT/CT in the post 177Lu-DOTATATE and 177Lu-PSMA617 setting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 50, 2250–2257 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06176-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06176-6

Keywords

Navigation