Abstract
Purpose
Dual-tracer, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine (18F-FDG/18F-FLT), dual-modality (positron emission tomography and computed tomography, PET/CT) imaging was used in a clinical trial on differentiation of pulmonary nodules. The aims of this trial were to investigate if multimodality imaging is of advantage and to what extent it could benefit the patients in real clinical settings.
Methods
Seventy-three subjects in whom it was difficult to establish the diagnosis and determine management of their pulmonary lesions were prospectively enrolled in this clinical trial. All subjects underwent 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET/CT imaging sequentially. The images were interpreted with different strategies as either individual or combined modalities. The pathological or clinical evidence during a follow-up period of more than 22 months served as the standard of truth. The diagnostic performance of each interpretation and their impact on clinical decision making was investigated.
Results
18F-FLT/18F-FDG PET/CT was proven to be of clinical value in improving the diagnostic confidence in 28 lung tumours, 18 tuberculoses and 27 other benign lesions. The ratio between maximum standardized uptake values of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG was found to be of great potential in separating the three subgroups of patients. The advantage could only be obtained with the full use of the multimodality interpretation. Multimodality imaging induced substantial change in clinical management in 31.5% of the study subjects and partial change in another 12.3%.
Conclusion
Multimodality imaging using 18F-FDG/18F-FLT PET/CT provided the best diagnostic efficacy and the opportunity for better management in this group of clinically challenging patients with pulmonary lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Newsline. Molecular imaging in the spotlight at RSNA 2007. J Nucl Med 2008;49(1):19N.
Rajendran JG, Mankoff DA. Beyond detection: novel applications for PET imaging to guide cancer therapy. J Nucl Med 2007;48(6):855–6.
van Waarde A, Cobben DC, Suurmeijer AJ, Maas B, Vaalburg W, de Vries EF, et al. Selectivity of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model. J Nucl Med 2004;45(4):695–700.
Ho CL, Chen SR, Yeung DWC, Cheng TK. Dual-tracer PET/CT imaging in evaluation of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2007;48:902–9.
Rischin D, Hicks RJ, Fisher R, Binns D, Corry J, Porceddu S, et al. Prognostic significance of [18F]-misonidazole positron emission tomography-detected tumor hypoxia in patients with advanced head and neck cancer randomly assigned to chemoradiation with or without tirapazamine: a substudy of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 98.02. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2098–104.
Linden HM, Stekhova SA, Link JM, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Ellis GK, et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2793–9.
Tian JH, Yang XF, Yu LJ, Chen P, Xin J, Ma L, et al. A multicenter clinical trial on the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/CT in pulmonary lesions using 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2008;49(2):186–94.
Bunyaviroch T, Coleman RE. PET evaluation of lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2006;47(3):451–69.
Strauss LG. Fluoro-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1409–15.
Schöder H, Yeung HWD, Larson SM. CT in PET/CT: essential features of interpretation. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1249–51.
Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J, Fueger BJ, Dahlbom M, Brown M, et al. Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med 2007;48:214–20.
Beck R, Röper B, Carlsen JM, Huisman M, Lebschi J, Andratschke N, et al. Pretreatment 18F-FAZA PET predicts success of hypoxia-directed radiochemotherapy using tirapazamine. J Nucl Med 2007;48:973–80.
Hsu AR, Cai W, Veeravagu A, Mohamedali KA, Chen K, Kim S, et al. Multimodality molecular imaging of glioblastoma growth inhibition with vasculature-targeting fusion toxin VEGF121/rGel. J Nucl Med 2007;48:445–54.
Wagnar HN. From molecular imaging to molecular medicine. J Nucl Med 2006;47(7):13N–39.
Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M, Pugsley JM, Schmidt RA, Rabinowitz P, et al. In vivo validation of 3′deoxy-3′-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8(11):3315–23.
Grierson JR, Shields AF. Radiosynthesis of 3′-deoxy-3′-[(18)F]fluorothymidine: [(18)F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivo. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27(2):143–56.
Reske SN, Deisenhofer S. Is 3′-deoxy-3′-(18)F-fluorothymidine a better marker for tumour response than (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33 Suppl 1:38–43.
Wieder HA, Geinitz H, Rosenberg R, Lordick F, Becker K, Stahl A, et al. PET imaging with [18F]3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine for prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34(6):878–83.
Buck AK, Halter G, Schirrmeister H, Kotzerke J, Wurziger I, Glatting G, et al. Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET: 18F-FLT versus 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2003;44(9):1426–31.
Yap CS, Czernin J, Fishbein MC, Cameron RB, Schiepers C, Phelps ME, et al. Evaluation of thoracic tumors with 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Chest 2006;129:393–401.
Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Ishikawa S, Nakano J, Chang SS, Bandoh S, et al. Correlation of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34(10):1610–6.
Troost EGC, Vogel WV, Merkx MAW, Slootweg PJ, Marres HAM, Peeters WJM, et al. 18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2007;48(5):726–35.
Porenta G. Being right for the right reason: better than just being right? J Nucl Med 2007;48(3):335–6.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Liu D, Shields AF, Gareen IF, Hanna L, et al. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(13):2155–61.
Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med 2003;44(9):1482–8.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30770607). The contributions of Drs. Zhoushe Zhao and Shuang Wang of GE, China, and all staff in the imaging centre are deeply appreciated.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, B., Guan, Z., Liu, C. et al. Can multimodality imaging using 18F-FDG/18F-FLT PET/CT benefit the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary lesions?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38, 285–292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1625-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1625-8