Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Answer
Femoral hernia
Discussion
The right groin sonography (Fig. 1) demonstrates an anechoic lobulated mass with posterior acoustic enhancement consistent with a cystic nature. There is no internal solid component or vascularity. The mass is located between the pubic bone medially and the external iliac vessels laterally. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates a uniformly T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense mass without contrast enhancement (Fig. 2). The mass was excised, but 4 years later, an MRI examination shows a recurrent mass of a similar cystic appearance. On both sonography and MRI, the mass shows a tapering end that extends posteriorly and superiorly in the groin, and this appearance mimics a “speech box” (Fig. 3). This imaging feature and the location of the mass confirm the diagnosis of femoral hernia, which was subsequently repaired. The histology of the hernia sac consists of a monolayer of mesothelial cells lining fibroadipose tissue (Fig. 4).
A femoral hernia is a protrusion of the peritoneal sac through the femoral ring into the femoral canal. Femoral hernias have a much lower incidence than inguinal hernias but carry a higher complication rate [1]. Clinical diagnosis is often difficult especially in early cases, with up to 40% missed at presentation [2]. Imaging, therefore, plays an essential role in management, as an early and accurate diagnosis of femoral hernia can help prevent potential complications of delayed diagnosis such as bowel strangulation and avoid unnecessary investigation or inadequate surgical treatment.
While the diagnosis of larger femoral hernias containing bowel or peritoneal fat is relatively straightforward, early femoral hernias may contain only peritoneal fluid and can be difficult to distinguish from other cystic lesions on imaging. As a case in point, we have failed to diagnose such femoral hernia in the present patient on a number of occasions, resulting in the need for a second surgical procedure. In hindsight, “availability bias” [3] might have resulted in the inability to consider femoral hernia as a differential diagnosis due to its lower probability relative to other conditions in the patients we serve, while “alliterative error” [3] might have perpetuated the error subsequently. Moreover, Valsalva maneuver, a technique which might potentially alert the radiologists to the diagnosis [4], was not performed during sonography.
Thus, femoral hernia should be considered in the differential diagnoses whenever a cystic groin mass is encountered at or near the femoral ring or canal, inferior to the inguinal ligament between the pubic tubercle and the femoral vein. Other considerations include a hydrocele of the Canal of Nuck (in women), lymphangioma, postoperative lymphocele or seroma, a cystic or necrotic lymph node and an epidermoid inclusion cyst. In these situations, a careful search for the subtle “speech box” sign [5] can lead to the correct diagnosis of femoral hernia. This sign arises when a fluid-filled structure, in this case a hernia sac, narrows rapidly towards the hernia neck at the femoral ring. This sign is not unique to femoral hernias, and similar findings have been described in other entities such as popliteal cysts [6], where the tapering extends towards the medial knee joint. With sonography, Valsalva maneuver may also be performed to verify the diagnosis [4].
In summary, imaging diagnosis of femoral hernia can be potentially difficult and radiologists must be cognizant of this possible differential diagnosis whenever a cystic lesion is encountered at its characteristic location. Recognizing the “speech box” sign in these situations is helpful in securing the correct diagnosis.
References
Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M. Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg. 2005;78(10):1171–3.
Nilsson H, Nilsson E, Angerås U, Nordin P. Mortality after groin hernia surgery: delay of treatment and cause of death. Hernia. 2011;15(3):301–7.
Busby LP, Courtier JL, Glastonbury CM. Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics. 2018;38(1):236–47.
Jacobson JA, Khoury V, Brandon CJ. Ultrasound of the groin: techniques, pathology, and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(3):513–23.
Thaker S, Botchu R, Gupta H. Sonographic, “speech bubble/speech box sign” in clinically occult femoral hernias: ultrasound findings and anatomical basis. J Ultrasound. 2021;24(3):361–6.
Vlychou M, Teh J. Ultrasound of muscle. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008;37(5):219–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval from the Institutional Review Board was obtained and in keeping with the policies for a non-human subject research; institutional review board oversight was not required. Consent has been obtained from the patient for the use of their data and images in this case report.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The case presentation can be found at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03963-w.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwok, H.C.K., Brady, M.S., Agaram, N.P. et al. Test yourself: Recurrent right groin lump. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1099–1101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03964-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03964-9