Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Post-arthrogram synovitis: MRI and histopathologic findings

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 57-year-old patient developed severe, persistent pain following MR arthrography with iodinated contrast. MRI 1 week later showed synovitis which was new compared to the prior MRI. Arthroscopy showed severe synovitis. Histopathology showed synovitis characterized by lymphocytes, neutrophils, and necrosis. One out of 4 intraoperative cultures was positive, but ultimately believed to be due to contaminants. CRP normalized within 1 month. Repeat MRI 2 years later showed progressive degenerative findings, but no evidence of ongoing infection, or stigmata of previous infection. We believe this to be an unusually severe case of reactive synovitis. The purpose of the report is to add to knowledge of reactions to intra-articular contrast injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hugo PC, Newberg AH, Newman JS, Wetzner SM. Complications of arthrography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1998;2(4):345–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH. Complications of arthrography. Radiology. 1985;155(3):605–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steurer-Dober I, Rufibach K, Hodler J, Saupe N, Zanetti M, Fucentese SF, et al. Do patients with structural abnormalities of the shoulder experience pain after MR arthrography of the shoulder? Radiology. 2010;256(3):870–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giaconi JC, Link TM, Vail TP, Fisher Z, Hong R, Singh R, et al. Morbidity of direct MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(4):868–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Costello RF, Beall DP, Van Zandt BL, Stapp AM, Martin HD, Steury SW. Contrast reaction from hip arthrogram. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(1):59–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bettmann MA, Heeren T, Greenfield A, Goudey C. Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR Contrast Agent Registry. Radiology. 1997;203(3):611–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990;175(3):621–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abujudeh HH, Kosaraju VK, Kaewlai R. Acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine: experience with 32,659 injections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):430–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saupe N, Zanetti M, Pfirrmann CW, Wels T, Schwenke C, Hodler J. Pain and other side effects after MR arthrography: prospective evaluation in 1085 patients. Radiology. 2009;250(3):830–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Wyshak G, Kilcoyne RF. Shoulder arthrography: comparison of morbidity after use of various contrast media. Radiology. 1985;154(2):339–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan P, Tu H, Lydiatt D, Sleder P, Williams S. Temporomandibular joint arthrography of normal subjects: prevalence of pain with ionic versus nonionic contrast agents. Radiology. 1985;156(3):825–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corbetti F, Malatesta V, Camposampiero A, Mazzi A, Punzi L, Angelini F, et al. Knee arthrography: effects of various contrast media and epinephrine on synovial fluid. Radiology. 1986;161(1):195–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall FM, Rosenthal DI, Goldberg RP, Wyshak G. Morbidity from shoulder arthrography: etiology, incidence, and prevention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(1):59–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, Bent S. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA. 2007;297(13):1478–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krey PR, Bailen DA. Synovial fluid leukocytosis. A study of extremes. Am J Med. 1979;67(3):436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang MS, Jeon JY, Park SS. Differential MRI findings of transient synovitis of the hip in children when septic arthritis is suspected according to symptom duration. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29(3):297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang WJ, Im SA, Lim GY, Chun HJ, Jung NY, Sung MS, et al. MR imaging of transient synovitis: differentiation from septic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(11):1154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SK, Suh KJ, Kim YW, Ryeom HK, Kim YS, Lee JM, et al. Septic arthritis versus transient synovitis at MR imaging: preliminary assessment with signal intensity alterations in bone marrow. Radiology. 1999;211(2):459–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill CL, Hunter DJ, Niu J, Clancy M, Guermazi A, Genant H, et al. Synovitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to pain and cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(12):1599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palmer WE. MR arthrography of the rotator cuff and labral-ligamentous complex. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1997;18(4):278–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Gebhard M, Wohlgemuth WA, Fischer W, Zentner J, Wegener R, et al. MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, Cervilla V, Karzel RP, Schweitzer ME, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992;182(2):431–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(4):829–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Magee T. MR versus MR arthrography in detection of supraspinatus tendon tears in patients without previous shoulder surgery. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(1):43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):969–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magee T. Utility of pre- and post-MR arthrogram imaging of the shoulder: effect on patient care. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1062):20160028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Charge Description Master Listing for MU Health Care Hospitals and Clinics. April 1, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Missouri at Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA

    Alexander Oserowsky, Lester J. Layfield & Julia Crim

Authors
  1. Alexander Oserowsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lester J. Layfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julia Crim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Crim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oserowsky, A., Layfield, L.J. & Crim, J. Post-arthrogram synovitis: MRI and histopathologic findings . Skeletal Radiol 51, 219–223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03877-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03877-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation