Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Small, superficial, indeterminate soft-tissue lesions as suspected sarcomas: is primary excision biopsy suitable?

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Suspected soft-tissue sarcomas are typically investigated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with a view to planning image-guided core needle biopsy for confirmation of the histological diagnosis. Indeterminate superficial lesions may be small and therefore potentially difficult to biopsy safely, such lesions possibly being more amenable to primary excision biopsy. The aim of this study is to determine the suitability of this practice in the setting of a specialist sarcoma service.

Materials and methods

All patients referred over a 12-month period to the sarcoma service with a small (<3-cm), indeterminate, superficial soft-tissue mass according to MRI criteria, or a small lesion of the hand or foot deemed unsafe for percutaneous biopsy, and who underwent primary excision biopsy were included. The histology results were categorized into neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions, and assessed for resection completeness.

Results

Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria from all patients referred to the sarcoma service in a 12-month period. Of these, 42 out of 58 (72.4%) had benign neoplasms, 4 out of 58 (6.9%) had malignant tumours, 2 out of 58 (3.4%) an intermediate grade lesion, while 10 out of 58 (17.2%) were non-neoplastic. All 4 malignant lesions were completely excised at the time of excision biopsy.

Conclusions

Primary excision biopsy of small, indeterminate soft-tissue masses within the setting of a specialist sarcoma service is a suitable management option. Only a small proportion of small superficial soft-tissue lesions with indeterminate MRI features are malignant tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodwin RW, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A. MRI appearances of common benign soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:843–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker EA, Fenton ME, Salesky JS, Murphey MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign soft tissue neoplasms in adults. Radiol Clin N Am. 2011;49:1197–217. vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crundwell N, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A. Non-neoplastic conditions presenting as soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:18–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarkson P, Ferguson PC. Primary multidisciplinary management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2004;5:451–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendenhall WM, Indelicato DJ, Scarborough MT, et al. The management of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimer R, Judson I, Peake D, Seddon B. Guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Sarcoma. 2010;2010:506182.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillen TJ, Baker JC, Jennings JW, Wessell DE. Image-guided biopsy and treatment of musculoskeletal tumors. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17:189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Avedian RS. Principles of musculoskeletal biopsy. Cancer Treat Res. 2014;162:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Traina F, Errani C, Toscano A, et al. Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger-Richardson D, Swallow CJ. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: risk/benefit considerations. Cancer. 2017;123:560–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. UyBico SJ, Motamedi K, Omura MC, et al. Relevance of compartmental anatomic guidelines for biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: retrospective review of 363 biopsies over a 6-year period. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:511–8, 518.e1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Weber M-A, Lalam RK, et al. Soft tissue tumors in adults: ESSR-approved guidelines for diagnostic imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyrop HB, Safwat A, Vedsted P, et al. Characteristics of 64 sarcoma patients referred to a sarcoma center after unplanned excision. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. NICE clinical guideline no.27. [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2005. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/CG027

  15. Datir A, James SLJ, Ali K, Lee J, Ahmad M, Saifuddin A. MRI of soft-tissue masses: the relationship between lesion size, depth, and diagnosis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:373–78, commentary 379–80.

  16. Calleja M, Dimigen M, Saifuddin A. MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:1517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blacksin MF, Ha D-H, Hameed M, Aisner S. Superficial soft-tissue masses of the extremities. Radiographics. 2006;26:1289–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hung EHY, Griffith JF, Ng AWH, Lee RKL, Lau DTY, Leung JCS. Ultrasound of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors superficial to the investing fascia. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:W532–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhuang KD, Tandon AA, Ho BCS, Chong BK. MRI features of soft-tissue lumps and bumps. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e568–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Andrews TR, Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Keeling JH. Superficial soft-tissue masses: analysis, diagnosis, and differential considerations. Radiographics. 2007;27:509–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Saifuddin A, Briggs T, Cannon S. Does image guidance improve accuracy of core needle biopsy in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours? Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:239–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoo MMY, Saifuddin A. The role of MRI in image-guided needle biopsy of focal bone and soft tissue neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:905–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandrasekar CR, Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A. The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:203–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Koulaxouzidis G, Schwarzkopf E, Bannasch H, Stark GB. Is revisional surgery mandatory when an unexpected sarcoma diagnosis is made following primary surgery? World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pretell-Mazzini J, Barton MD, Conway SA, Temple HT. Unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcomas: current concepts for management and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Khoo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, M., Pressney, I., Hargunani, R. et al. Small, superficial, indeterminate soft-tissue lesions as suspected sarcomas: is primary excision biopsy suitable?. Skeletal Radiol 46, 919–924 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2635-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2635-4

Keywords

Navigation