Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-time sonoelastography of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Real-time sonoelastography (SE) is a new ultrasound-based imaging technique that provides information on tissue elasticity and stiffness. We determined the efficacy of SE for assessing Achilles tendon abnormalities in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Materials and methods

Forty-one consecutive AS patients and 32 asymptomatic healthy subjects were enrolled. Achillodynia was scored on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale. A high-resolution ultrasound machine equipped with an elastography-compatible linear probe was used to perform bilateral B-mode ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and SE examinations of Achilles tendons. Tendons were divided into proximal, middle, and distal segments. B-mode examinations included tendon thicknesses, echotextures, and enthesopathic findings. SE using color-coded images was performed in the same areas. Normal consistent tendon structures were coded as blue or green, and moderately (yellow) or severely (red) softened areas were considered pathological.

Results

The distal third of the Achilles tendons was the most commonly affected part in the AS patients compared with healthy subjects (p = 0.001), whose middle third was more commonly affected. Achillodynia intensity tended to be higher in patients with pathological B-mode or SE examination findings (p = 0.09 and p = 0.07 respectively). Softening detected by SE in the distal third was associated with enthesopathy findings such as calcaneal bone erosions (Fisher’s X 2, p = 0.07) and tendinous enlargement (Fisher’s X 2, p = 0.001). B-mode and SE findings had moderate to good correlation in the assessment of Achilles tendon abnormalities.

Conclusions

Sonoelastography may be useful for the evaluation of tendon abnormalities in patients with AS; in addition; it may be useful for the evaluation of other inflammatory rheumatic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q. 2011;27(3):177–86. doi:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a2138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR. Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(3):323–33. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1254521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Y, Snedeker JG. Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(4):389–97. doi:10.1007/s00256-010-0918-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, Weber S, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid : Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2010;20(10):1145–50. doi:10.1089/thy.2010.0079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):604–10. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong X, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xiong P, Yan W, Chen Y. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(1):11–8. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1745-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ying L, Hou Y, Zheng HM, Lin X, Xie ZL, Hu YP. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2576–84. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carstensen EL, Parker KJ, Lerner RM. Elastography in the management of liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(10):1535–46. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McNally EG. The development and clinical applications of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(9):1223–31. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1220-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong Q, Fessell DP. Achilles tendon ultrasound technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(3):W173. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(12):1196–202. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Francois RJ, Braun J, Khan MA. Entheses and enthesitis: a histopathologic review and relevance to spondyloarthritides. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13(4):255–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Archambault JM, Wiley JP, Bray RC, Verhoef M, Wiseman DA, Elliott PD. Can sonography predict the outcome in patients with achillodynia? J Clin Ultrasound JCU. 1998;26(7):335–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):W134–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner G, Reindl M, Fink C, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic Achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31(4):394–400. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1109809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan S, Kudas S, Ozcan AS, Ipek A, Karaoglanoglu M, Arslan H, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of the Achilles tendon: pattern description in healthy subjects and patients with surgically repaired complete ruptures. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;41(9):1067–72. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1339-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography in the evaluation of painful Achilles tendon in amateur athletes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(3):373–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Havre RF, Elde E, Gilja OH, Odegaard S, Eide GE, Matre K, et al. Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(10):1638–50. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdurrahman Tufan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turan, A., Tufan, A., Mercan, R. et al. Real-time sonoelastography of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 42, 1113–1118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1637-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1637-0

Keywords

Navigation