Abstract
A 60-year-old man with a 4-year history of intractable neck pain and radicular pain in the C5 nerve root distribution presented to our department for a CT-guided transforaminal left C5 nerve root block. He had had a similar procedure on the right 2 months previously, and had significant improvement of his symptoms with considerable pain relief. On this occasion he was again accepted for the procedure after the risks and potential complications had been explained. Under CT guidance, a 25G spinal needle was introduced and after confirmation of the position of the needle, steroid was injected. Immediately the patient became unresponsive, and later developed a MR-proven infarct affecting the left vertebral artery (VA) territory. This is the first report of a major complication of a cervical root injection under CT guidance reported in the literature. We present this case report and the literature review of the potential complications of this procedure.
References
Berger O, Dousset V, Delmer O, Pointillart V, Vital JM, Caille JM. Evaluation of efficacy of foraminal infusions of corticosteroids guided by computed tomography in the treatment of radicular pain by foraminal injection. J Radiol 1999;80:917–25.
Strobel K, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid M, Hodler J, Boos N, Zanetti M. Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging. Radiology 2004 Oct;233(1):87–92.
Wagner AL. CT fluoroscopic-guided cervical nerve root blocks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:43–4.
Baker R, Dreyfuss P, Mercer S, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain 2003;103(1–2):211–5.
Bush K, Hillier S. Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular /epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J 1996;5:319–35.
Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Jackson HB, Rogers DP, Vresilovic EJ. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical management of atraumatic cervical spondylitic radicular pain: a retrospective analysis with independent clinical review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:741–6.
Vallee JN, Feydy A, Carlier RY, Mutschler C, Mompoint D, Vallee CA. Chronic cervical radiculopathy: lateral approach periradicular corticosteroid injection. Radiology 2001;218:886–92.
Slosar PJ, White AH, Wetzel FT. Controversy: the use of selective nerve root blocks- diagnostic, therapeutic, or placebo? Spine 1998;23:2253–6.
Brouwers PJ, Kottink EJ, Simon MA, Prevo RL. A cervical anterior spinal artery syndrome after diagnostic blockade of the right C6- nerve root. Pain 2001;91(3):397–9.
Hodges SD, Castleberg RL, Miller T, Ward R, Thornburg C. Cervical Epidural steroid injection with intrinsic spinal cord damage. Two case reports. Spine 1998;23:2137–42.
Manchikanti L. Cervical epidural steroid injection with intrinsic spinal cord damage. Spine 1999;24:1170–2.
Williams KN, Jackowski A, Evans PJ. Epidural haematoma requiring surgical decompression following repeated cervical epidural steroid injections for chronic pain. Pain 1990;42:197–9.
Chan ST, Leung S. Spinal epidural abscess following steroid injection for sciatica: case report. Spine 1989;14:106–8.
Tiso RL, Cutler T, Catania JA, Whalen K. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: the role of corticosteroids. Spine J 2004, Jul–Aug;4(4):468–74.
Rozin L, Rozin R, Koehler SA, et al. Death during transforaminal epidural steroid nerve root block (C7) due to perforation of the left vertebral artery. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24(4):351–5.
Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O’Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural injections. Spine 2003;28(1):21–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suresh, S., Berman, J. & Connell, D.A. Cerebellar and brainstem infarction as a complication of CT-guided transforaminal cervical nerve root block. Skeletal Radiol 36, 449–452 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0215-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0215-0