Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of radiography in grading and tissue-specific diagnosis—a study of 200 consecutive bone tumors of the hand

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the usefulness of radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating benign from malignant bony tumors of the hand and in making a tissue-specific diagnosis.

Design

Two hundred consecutive bony tumors of the hand, the details of which originated from a national databank, were studied in a prospective way by radiography (100%) and by MRI (25%). All tumors were graded on a five-point scale, from certainly benign to certainly malignant, using location and morphology as diagnostic parameters. For all tumors a tissue-specific diagnosis was made, by the proposal of three possibilities in decreasing order of probability. Histological diagnosis was made by peer review, according to the WHO classification.

Results

By the combining of “certainly” and “probably” benign (grades I and II) and “certainly” and “probably” malignant (grades IV and V), a correct grading was obtained in 165 (82.5%) of the cases (154 of the 173 benign and 11 of the 27 malignant tumors). A correct tissue-specific diagnosis was included in the three proposed differentials in 87.5%. MRI confirmed a correct diagnosis made on radiography in 72% and improved the grading capability by correctly upgrading malignant tumors and downgrading benign tumors in, respectively, 8% and 12%. The capability to obtain a tissue-specific diagnosis improved with change of an incorrect diagnosis on radiography to a correct one on MRI in 12 cases (24%).

Conclusion

Subjective (semiquantitative) grading on radiography by an expert group proved to be excellent when compared with the results of a quantitative analysis of individual grading parameters. Multiple logistic regression analysis of these parameters resulted in a grading formula containing only six variables. The additional value of MRI in grading was amply demonstrated. Already high accuracy of radiography, in making a tissue-specific diagnosis, improved substantially after the performance of MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Unni KK. Dahlin's bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11087 cases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F, Somville J. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients. Eur J Radiol 1995;21:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloem JL, van der Woude HJ, Geirnaerdt M, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AHM, Hermans J. Does magnetic resonance imaging make a difference for patients with musculoskeletal sarcoma? Br J Radiol 1997;70:327–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG, Caudry DJ, Palmer WE, McNeil BJ. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1997;202:237–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia J, Bianchi S. Diagnostic imaging of tumors of the hand and wrist. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1470–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Plate AM, Lee SJ, Steiner G, Posner MA. Tumorlike lesions and benign tumors of the hand and wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:129–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lodwick GS. A probabilistic approach to the diagnosis of bone tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 1965;3:487–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenspan A. Remagen W. Differential diagnosis of tumors and tumor-like lesions of bones and joints. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1998. p. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pettersson H, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Springfield DS, Andrew ER, Spanier S, Slone R. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: experience from 193 examinations. Radiology 1985;157:109

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mulder JD, Kroon HM, Schutte HE, Taconis WK. Radiologic atlas of bone tumors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schajowicz F. Tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone: pathology, radiology and treatment. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD, Sweet DE. Analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part I: internal margins. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:715–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ragsdale BD, Madewell JE, Sweet DE. Analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part II: periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:749–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweet DE, Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD. Analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part III: matrix patterns. Radial Clin North Am 1981;19:785–814

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors of the hand and wrist. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995;3:327–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oestreich AE. The acrophysis: a unifying concept for understanding enchondral bone growth and its disorders. II. Abnormal growth. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:119–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilner D. Radiology of bone tumors and allied disorders. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1982

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adler CP, Kozlowski K. Hand tumors. In: Adler CP, Kozlowski K, editors. Primary bone tumors and tumorous conditions in children. Pathologic and radiologic diagnosis. London Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1993. p. 223–30

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berquist TH, Kransdorf MJ. Tumors and tumorlike conditions. Berquist TH. MRI of the hand and wrist. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patil S, de Silva MVC, Crossan J, Reid R. Chondrosarcoma of small bones of the hand. J Hand Surg 2003;28:602–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bovee JVM, van der Heul RO, Taminiau AHM, Hogendoorn PCW. Chondrosarcoma of the phalanx. A locally aggressive lesion with minimal metastatic potential: a report of 35 cases and review of the literature. Cancer 2000;9:1724–32

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diegel S, White LM, Brahme S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: part 5. The wrist. Clin Orthop 1996;332:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Azouz EM, Babyn PS, Mascia AT, Tuuha SE, Decarie J-C. Pictorial essay. MRI of the abnormal pediatric hand and wrist with plain film correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:252–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Geirnaerdt MJA, Hogendoorn PCW, Bloem JL, Taminiau AHM, van der Woude HJ. Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced imaging. Radiology 2000;214:539–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gohla T, van Schoonhoven J, Prommersberger KJ, Lanz U. Chondrosarcomas of the hand. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004;36:328–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. De Schepper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oudenhoven, L.F.I.J., Dhondt, E., Kahn, S. et al. Accuracy of radiography in grading and tissue-specific diagnosis—a study of 200 consecutive bone tumors of the hand. Skeletal Radiol 35, 78–87 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0023-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0023-y

Keywords

Navigation