Introduction

Of all Yersinia species (spp.), three are pathogenic to humans: Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis, and Y. pestis (Rosenzweig et al. 2011; Rosenzweig and Chopra 2012). The two former species typically cause self-limiting gastroenteritis, often referred to as yersiniosis, although Y. enterocolitica is more commonly associated with the disease (Galindo et al. 2011). Y. pestis, by contrast, is a bona fide highly invasive human pathogen, the stuff [sic] of nightmares. Although only having evolutionarily diverged from Y. pseudotuberculosis some 1500–20,000 years ago (Achtman et al. 1999), Y. pestis causes three forms of human disease: bubonic (often promoting fulminant infection), septicemic, and pneumonic with high morbidity and mortality rates (approaching 100%) if left untreated (Titball and Leary 1998; Demeure et al. 2019a, b). More specifically, plague-induced mortality has claimed over 200 million human lives during the course of 3 major human pandemics ranging from 541 CE (Justinian plague) through the 1300s (Black Death plague) until today (Indo-China plague) (Rosenzweig et al. 2011; Sun 2016; Sun and Singh 2019; Williamson 2009). The cumulative, historical death-toll serves as a grim reminder of our extreme vulnerability. Raising global concerns, the most recent outbreak in Madagascar (2017–2018) resulted in 202 deaths (from 2348 cases, with ~76% of the cases being pneumonic) during a 3-month period (WHO Plague-Madgascar n.d.).

Genetically distinguishable from its two related gastrointestinal Yersinia spp., Y. pestis gained a subset of genes, enhancing survival in both flea and mouse/rat reservoirs, as well as lost subsets of its chromosome, including adhesin encoding genes used for gut epithelium attachment (Achtman et al. 1999; Demeure et al. 2019a, b). Y. pestis is typically transmitted via the bite of an arthropod vector, the flea, and persists in rodent populations. Unfortunately, humans occasionally interrupt the vector-rodent chain of transmission resulting in grave consequences (Greenfield et al. 2002; Rosenzweig et al. 2011; Rosenzweig and Chopra 2012).

Type three secretion system injectosome and type six secretion system

All three pathogenic yersiniae possess a 70-kb virulence plasmid that encodes a type three secretion system (T3SS), an evolutionarily repurposed flagellar, macromolecular complex/system (Abby and Rocha 2012). The 70-kb virulence plasmid, termed pCD1 in Y. pestis, piB1 in Y. pseudotuberculosis, or pYV in Y. enterocolitica, encodes the requisite machinery for the hyper-structure T3SS injectosome as well as its potent anti-host effector proteins/toxins (Cornelis et al. 1998). Multiple hyper-structures, including the T3SS, exist within yersiniae. Moreover, these hyper-structures or their components likely interact. For example, the RNA degradosome, a macromolecular hyper-structure involved in RNA decay and processing (Carpousis 2007), is believed to cooperate with the T3SS within yersiniae (Norris et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2008; Rosenzweig et al. 2005; Rosenzweig et al. 2007).

Twenty-seven Yersinia secretion proteins (Yscs) comprise the T3SS injectosome, and the substrates secreted through the Ysc needle conduit are termed Yersinia outer membrane proteins (Yops). There are 6 effector Yops, each exerting its own anti-host property, while the remaining Yops serve delivery-facilitating roles, including the low calcium response V (LcrV) antigen (Miletic et al. 2020; Demeure et al. 2019a, b; Grabowski et al. 2017; Trosky et al. 2008; Cornelis 2003). In addition to the T3SS, the type 2 secretion system (T2SS) of Y. enterocolitica has also been shown to support its virulence by promoting tissue invasion (von Tils et al. 2012).

Beyond the T2SS and the T3SS, a T6SS has been characterized in all three pathogenic yersiniae (Yang et al. 2018). The T6SS is evolutionarily derived from repurposed phage machinery, enabling bacteria to puncture target cells and subsequently deliver effector proteins (Zoued et al. 2014). Y. pestis was found to possess 5 T6SS encoding clusters of virulence-associated secretion genes (vas) (Andersson et al. 2017; Li et al. 2015). Interestingly, 3 of the 5 T6SS clusters were required for full virulence in murine models of infection (Ponnusamy et al. 2015). None of the T6SS antigens has yet been targeted as vaccine development candidates, although they represent potential candidates (Ponnusamy et al. 2015, Fitts et al., 2016, and Andersson et al. 2017).

Vaccine targets beyond the T3SS: other Y. pestis plasmids and their gene products

The plague pathogen is benefitted by having additional virulence factors extending beyond its T3SS injectosome. Although the 70-kb virulence plasmid is shared by all three pathogenic yersiniae, only Y. pestis possesses two additional plasmids: the 9.5-kb pPCP1 plasmid (pPla) and the 110-kb pMT1 plasmid (pFra). The pPCP1 plasmid encodes the plasminogen-activating protease (Pla), which promotes bacterial dissemination via disruptions in blot clot formation and complement cascade activation (Suomalainen et al. 2007). Additionally, a pPla plasmid addiction system encoding a bacteriocin, pesticin, and its immunity gene product, pesticin immunity protein, ensures both selection pressure on plasmid maintenance and an offensive strategy that kills bacterial neighbors lacking the immunity protein (Rosenzweig et al. 2011 and references therein).

The pMT1 plasmid encodes a highly immunogenic, anti-phagocytic capsular antigen Fraction 1, referred to as F1. Due to its ability to induce robust immune responses, the F1 antigen has been the subject of a large number of plague candidate vaccine development efforts (Williamson and Oyston 2013; Rosenzweig et al. 2011; Demeure et al. 2019a, b; Sun and Singh 2019). Additionally, the plasmid encodes the 61-kDa Yersinia murine toxin (Ymt) known to promote bacterial survival in the flea mid-gut, and purified Ymt has been shown to promote broad toxicity in mice, including decreased blood sugar levels and internal bleeding (Fan et al. 2016). Although Ymt is required for mid-gut colonization of Y. pestis in the flea 1–2 weeks following infection, Ymt is not required for early-phase transmission (3 days post-infection) from flea to mouse (Johnson et al. 2014). As plague vaccine development gains momentum and traction, new candidate vaccines (Tables 1 and 2) are being evaluated for their safety and efficacy with the hope of several achieving clinical trial status in the near future.

Table 1 Y. pestis protein subunit and DNA vaccine candidates
Full size table
Table 2 Y. pestis recombinant, live-attenuated, and rodent vaccine candidates
Full size table

Subunit vaccine strategies

Major subunit plague vaccine candidates are utilizing F1 and LcrV antigens, prompting the development of recombinant F1-LcrV (rF1-V) vaccines (Rosenzweig et al. 2011). However, there have been shortcomings with rF1-V candidates necessitating modifications so as to elicit more robust cellular immune responses (Smiley 2008). Consequently, a CD137 ligand was included as an adjuvant together with alhydrogel in the rF1-V vaccine platform, and was demonstrated to induce enhanced cell-mediated immunity (Bowen et al. 2019). Unfortunately, enhanced cell-mediated immunity in male mice did not translate into protection when animals were primed and boosted with the rF1-V + alhydrogel + CD137 ligand vaccine candidate in a pneumonic plague model; only female mice were protected against pneumonic plague for unknown reasons (Bowen et al. 2019). In a novel approach, Carvalho et al. (2019) have employed micro-vesicles derived from recombinant commensal Bacteroides spp. expressing and producing plague F1 and LcrV antigens as a vaccine delivery platform. This system allowed for facile targeted delivery of plague antigen–charged micro-vesicles to both lung and gut mucosa of nonhuman primates resulting in robust IgG and IgA production in blood and airways, respectively (Carvalho et al. 2019).

Storage and ensuring integrity are of paramount concerns, particularly when shipping vaccines to various parts of the world where refrigeration may be unavailable. With that in mind, a dual subunit vaccine consisting of associated F1 and LcrV was lyophilized. Not only was the preparation stable for 29 weeks at 40°C, but subcutaneous administration and an orally delivered boost also protected immunized Balb/c mice from bubonic challenge (Moore et al. 2018). In a similar approach, F1-loaded microspheres were characterized for their antigen release kinetics in vitro as well as for their immunogenicity in a murine model. Not only was a robust anti-F1 IgG titer measured but also 100% protection in Balb/c mice was achieved following a prime-boost regimen (Huang et al. 2014).

Interestingly, in a Chinese human clinical study evaluating an F1 + rV vaccine candidate, not only was the vaccine well tolerated in 18–55-year-olds but also it generated significant antibody titers and 100% sero-conversion for F1 antibodies (Hu et al. 2018). Additionally, single doses of an F1-V-loaded polyanhydride nanoparticle vaccine, when coupled with cyclic dinucleotides capable of inducing interferon genes, induced both rapid short-term and long-term humoral immunity in mice that protected against pneumonic plague (Wagner et al. 2019). Eliminating a boost requirement makes this candidate an attractive option. In attempting to elucidate the F1-V vaccine-induced host signaling responses in mice, the myeloid differentiation primary response 88 protein (MyD88) and Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4, but not TLR-2, were required for optimal vaccine immune response as well as subsequent protection against pneumonic plague challenge (Dankmeyer et al. 2014).

In some instances, plague subunit vaccines have included proteins from other bacterial pathogens creating cocktail subunit vaccine candidates (Rosenzweig et al. 2011). A multiple antigen fusion protein consisting of the Y. pestis LcrV and F1 antigens, as well as the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen and lethal factor, was used to immunize and boost mice prior to Y. pestis and anthrax toxin challenges. Encouragingly, immunized mice were completely protected (i.e., 100%) against subsequent Y. pestis challenge and 90% protected against anthrax toxin (Gallagher et al. 2019). Some efforts have cast a wider net and are interrogating other antigens as potential vaccine candidates. The attachment invasion locus (Ail/OmpX), outer membrane protein A (OmpA), and Pla are three such candidates. In mice, OmpA and Ail vaccines were protective against bubonic challenge with an F1− Y. pestis variant while the Pla candidate vaccine was protective against pneumonic plague (Erova et al. 2013).

DNA vaccines

Oligonucleotide vaccine platforms offer several advantages and have been gaining some traction over the years. Criticism has emphasized poor immunogenicity; however, the early success of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may renew interest in oligonucleotide plague vaccine development. Some plague DNA vaccine development has been highlighted in the literature (Rosenzweig et al. 2011; Verma and Tuteja 2016 and references therein); however, there have been a paucity of current advances.

In a report, plasmid constructs encoding two codon-optimized plague antigens, F1 and LcrV, together with the protective antigen (PA) from B. anthracis, were used to develop DNA vaccine candidates; constructs were delivered to mice using an electroporation-based system following a prime-boost schedule. Not only were the pVAX constructs encoding F1 and LcrV 100% protective in A/J inbred mice following plague challenge but also the pVAX construct encoding PA conferred 100% protection against a lethal B. anthracis spore challenge (Albrecht et al. 2012). Most importantly, the aforementioned DNA vaccine candidates promoted a balanced Th1/Th2 response as evidenced by elevated levels of both interferon-γ and interleukin-4 (Albrecht et al. 2012a). Such a response profile is certainly more desirable than the Th2-skewed response profiles of many protein subunit vaccines. Similarly, a gene gun delivery of a DNA vaccine encoding a fusion of B. anthracis truncated lethal factor protein and Y. pestis LcrV or F1 enhanced survival of mice against pneumonic plague when boosted with a DNA vaccine encoding the B. anthracis PA (Albrecht et al. 2012b). Interestingly, DNA vaccines coupled with subunit boost may work synergistically to acquire the greatest protection. More specially, following immunization with a DNA vaccine encoding LcrV and subsequent protein LcrV subunit vaccine boost, high titers of anti-LcrV antibodies were measured in Balb/c mice (Li et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2004).

Recombinant vaccines

Y. pestis and B. anthracis are the two most likely candidate bacterial pathogens that could be weaponized for bio-warfare (Rosenzweig et al. 2011). Therefore, some approaches combine the two, or derivatives thereof, into a single vaccine platform. Previously, a combined vaccine was protective in both a mouse and rabbit model of bubonic plague and cutaneous anthrax (Ren et al. 2009). More recently, a dual anthrax-plague nanoparticle that employed a T4 phage delivery system was evaluated for efficacy. The anthrax-protective antigen and the plague F1 and LcrV antigens were fused to phage T4 outer capsid proteins. Encouragingly, the vaccine conferred complete protection against both lethal challenges of inhalation anthrax and pneumonic plague in mice, rats, and rabbits (Tao et al. 2018).

In another approach involving the use of recombinant Y. pseudotuberculosis expressing the Y. pestis F1 antigen (referred to as the VTnF1 vaccine candidate; Derbise et al. 2015), protection against bubonic and pneumonic challenge was observed in both inbred and outbred murine models. Furthermore, serum transfer to naïve mice demonstrated protection against bubonic challenge (Demeure et al. 2019a, b). Following a single oral dose of VTnF1, mice were protected against bubonic and pneumonic plague including challenge with a Y. pestis variant devoid of the F1 antigen (Demeure et al. 2017). This is a very attractive feature as Y. pestis strains have been found to be lacking F1 in nature and are as virulent as encapsulated strains.

On account of the absence of F1 in some Y. pestis strains, several pipeline vaccine candidates have pivoted away from F1. For example, an attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis ΔyopK ΔyopJ Δasd triple mutant, unable to produce the translocator YopK and effector YopJ proteins, ectopically expressed a Y. pestis fusion protein composed of a truncated YopE1-138-LcrV. The candidate vaccine conferred 80% and 90% survival following bubonic and pneumonic challenge, respectively, in mice having received a single-dose oral immunization. Strong humoral and cell-mediated responses were also observed with protection against lethal Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis challenge (Singh et al. 2019). Still other Y. pestis attenuated strains are being evaluated as potential recombinant vaccine candidates, including the KIM strain. More specifically, the KIM background strain was used to generate a ΔyopJ mutant overexpressing the Y. enterocolitica YopP; the recombinant Y. pestis vaccine candidate was able to protect Oncins France 1 (OF1), albino, outbred mice against pneumonic and bubonic challenge via host interferon-γ involvement. Surprisingly, the vaccine candidate was also able to protect against subsequent Y. enterocolitica challenge. Interestingly, after infecting mice with a subcutaneous dose of 1 × 104 cfu of the recombinant Y. pestis KIM strain, ~70% of the mice were protected against subsequent intranasal challenge with either 500 or 5000 cfu of Francisella tularensis, an unrelated organism (Zauberman et al. 2013). This peripheral benefit is due to the vaccine candidate eliciting cross-protective antibodies against F. tularensis (Zauberman et al. 2013).

Some recent recombinant platforms have involved organisms other than yersiniae. A recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum and a recombinant Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV), both expressing LcrV-F1, were employed in a mouse immunization study. Only TMV expressing LcrV and F1 protected 100% of pneumonic plague–challenged mice, while the L. plantarum LcrV-F1 expressing recombinant conferred only partial protection as measured by mouse mortality (Arnaboldi et al. 2016). Another strong candidate is a well-characterized Salmonella recombinant vaccine that was engineered to express 3 plague antigens: a truncated LcrV, F1, and pesticin receptor (Psn). Following oral immunization using the aforementioned vaccine candidate, mice were 100% protected against both bubonic and pneumonic plague (Sananpala et al. 2016).

Additionally, a live vaccine strain for Francisella tularensis devoid of its capB gene and an attenuated multiple-gene-deleted Listeria monocytogenes vaccine strain, both expressing F1-V plague recombinant protective antigens, were evaluated. Following a prime-boost schedule with both platforms, mice were protected against pneumonic plague challenge (Jia et al. 2018). With fear of potential reversion, a low-probable reality when considering a live-attenuated Y. pestis vaccine or a recombinant Y. pseudotuberculosis, Salmonella Typhimurium, F. tularensis, or L. monocytogenes vaccine may offer a potentially safer alternative without compromising efficacy.

Adenovirus vector vaccines

While some strains of Y. pestis lack the F1 capsular antigen, evidence has shown that these strains can be fully virulent (Sha et al. 2011; Quenee et al. 2008). In addition, divergence of LcrV variants presents issues for efficacy of F1-V vaccines. Therefore, efforts have been focused on discovering combinations of immunogenic antigens that will provide protection against these strains. Vaccination of mice with YscF, a T3SS needle structure protein, showed increased protection against intravenous (via the retro-orbital sinus) challenge with the KIM5 strain (Matson et al. 2005). Based on this evidence, a trivalent vaccine utilizing an adenovirus vector has shown promise. Sha et al. (2016) employed a replication-defective human type-5 adenovirus (Ad5) vector to construct a recombinant YFV fusion gene vaccine encompassing ycsF, caf1, and lcrV. Impressively, one intranasal dose of the trivalent rAD5-YFV vaccine combined with an intramuscular prime-boost of recombinant fusion protein rYFV provided up to 100% protection in murine and nonhuman primate (NHP) models when challenged with a high aerosol dose of CO92. Furthermore, histopathological studies revealed vaccinated NHPs showed no signs of lesions in various organ tissues (Sha et al. 2016).

The World Health Organization (WHO) has since released a target product profile for plague vaccines that includes recommendations for needle-free vaccines in 2 or fewer doses (WHO Workshop 2018). In response to this recommendation, the rAd5-YFV vaccine was further evaluated using 1 or 2 intranasal doses without the rYFV prime-boost strategy. It was shown that 2 doses provided 100% protection in both pneumonic and bubonic plague models, as well as an induction of humoral, mucosal, and cell-mediated immunity (Kilgore et al. 2021). Importantly, the vaccine was equally (100%) protective in mice when challenge occurred with either the parental Y. pestis CO92 strain or its F1-negative variant (Kilgore et al., 2021). However, most humans likely possess pre-existing antibodies against Ad5, so immunogenicity of Ad5-vectored vaccines could be low as a result. Both Sha et al. (2016) and Kilgore et al. (2021) demonstrated that intranasal administration of the rAd5-YFV vaccine has the potential to bypass pre-existing antibodies to Ad5 vectors. Furthermore, the Ad5 vector, when compared to other adenovirus-vectored vaccines, elicits minimal proinflammatory responses (Teigler et al. 2012). As with the most recent SARS-CoV-2 vaccines distributed by Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, adenovirus-vectored vaccines can be successfully implemented against high-consequence pathogens.

Live-attenuated vaccines

Until the recent advent of attenuated Y. pestis genetically mutated strains, the Western world has generally frowned upon the utilization of a live-attenuated plague vaccine for widespread distribution (Sun et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2013). Although the live-attenuated plague vaccine EV76, created in 1936 in the Former Soviet Union, is still used by some former Soviet countries, the vaccine is not utilized in the USA, Europe, or Canada due to its strong reactogenicity (Titball and Williamson 2004). Even so, millions of people have received the live-attenuated EV76 vaccine in the past 80 years with minimal and ephemeral side effects (Feodorova et al. 2014).

In fact, a protocol was developed to rapidly assess live-attenuated EV vaccine candidates in bubonic plague infection models of both mice and guinea pigs (Feodorova et al. 2016). Furthermore, to evaluate plague EV vaccine efficacy more specifically, Sagiyev et al. (2019) measured anti-F1 antibody titers to determine the undefined period of protection and make future vaccine dosing schedule recommendations in Kazakhstan. The highest level of protective anti-F1 serum antibodies was observed 4 months following vaccination with significant reductions in antibody titers at both 8 and 12 months following vaccination. As a result, recommendations were made to vaccinate approximately 4 months ahead of spring when rodent populations become active in Kazakhstan (Sagiyev et al. 2019). To further evaluate the EV plague vaccine strain, the cell-mediated responses to Pla protease were measured in immunized humans and found to be robust up to 1 year post-vaccination (Feodorova et al. 2018).

Several other seemingly useful live-attenuated vaccine candidates with varying plasmid compositions have also emerged. Y. pestis subspecies altaica 1-2948/3, 1-3749, and 1/3480 were able to elicit strong cell-mediated responses in a mouse model of infection (Balakhonov et al. 2017). In that same vein, a direct comparison of the virulence of the Y. pestis EV vaccine strain to the microtus 201 (avirulent in humans) strain in an intravenous (i.v.) rhesus macaque infection model revealed that both strains were well tolerated in NHPs at high doses. However, the microtus strain infected the lungs and led to 100% mortality in 1010 i.v.-challenged animals; none of the EV-challenged animals died at that same dose (Tian et al. 2014). The side effects associated with the EV strain in humans as well as the ability of the pigmentation locus (pgm) minus strains of Y. pestis to cause a fatal disease in patients with hemochromatosis suggest that the EV mutant strain could be further attenuated through specific gene knockouts to generate live-attenuated plague vaccine candidates, as has been recently reported (Tiner et al. 2015A&B; Tiner et al. 2016; van Lier et al. 2014).

Another target for live-attenuated vaccine candidates has been LPS and its derivatives. In Y. enterocolitica, the acetyltransferase, encoded by the msbB gene, was upregulated at 21°C, relative to the mammalian temperature of 37°C, leading predominantly to a hexa-acylated lipid A as compared to predominantly tetra-acylated lipid A at 37°C. Furthermore, lipid A acylation status was shown to directly affect virulence-associated gene expression levels as well as sensitivity to polymyxin B (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2010). Additionally, when the Escherichia coli–derived acyltransferase LpxL was expressed in Y. pestis at 37°C, an atypical hexa-acylated lipid A was observed, thereby promoting dendritic cell migration, which was mollified by Y. pestis disruption of TLR-4-induction of IL-12 (Robinson et al. 2008). Finally, by using humanized mice expressing TLR-4, Y. pestis was shown to use its thermal regulation of lipid A acylation states to evade recognition by human TLR-4 (Hajjar et al. 2012). In that vein, our group characterized the role of chromosomally encoded Braun lipoprotein (Lpp) and the MsbB acetyltransferase in the virulence of Y. pestis CO92. While Lpp activates TLR-2, MsbB catalyzes the addition of lauric acid to the lipid A moiety of LPS, thus increasing its biological potency by activating TLR-4 (Sha et al. 2013).

We demonstrated that combinatorial mutants (e.g., ∆lpp∆msbB/ail [LMA] and ∆lpp∆msbB∆pla [LMP]) were more significantly attenuated (100% animal survival) than single or double mutants, provided long-term protective immunity (cell-mediated and humoral) in rodents, and, thus, could provide a platform for developing an efficacious live-attenuated plague vaccine(s) (Tiner et al. 2015A&B; Tiner et al. 2016; van Lier et al. 2014; van Lier et al. 2015). The vaccine strains cleared from animals within 24 h with no histopathological lesions in various organs during immunization or after challenge of immunized animals (Tier et al. 2015B, Tiner et al. 2016; van Lier et al. 2014). These vaccine candidates provide protection against both bubonic and pneumonic plague. Our vaccine strains have the following advantages: (1) rationally designed with complete deletion of three genes, (2) are stable with no risk for reversion because of the deletion of three genes located on different DNA regions; the mutants have been sequenced with no secondary mutations, (3) lpp and msbB deletions greatly reduce host reactogenicity relative to EV76 vaccine, (4) LMA/LMP mutants generate immune responses to thousands of Yp antigens, thus would provide cross-protection against different Yp biovars/strains, (5) the mutants are excluded from the CDC select agent list, and (6) fulfill the target product profile provided by the WHO.

Rodent vaccinations

Another approach to tackling the plague threat is to directly vaccinate rodent zoonotic reservoirs. The major goal of such efforts is conservation of delicate ecosystem balances by protecting rodents susceptible to plague-induced mortality (Salkeld 2017; Roth 2019). Furthermore, by such control, plague infection spillover into human populations as collateral damage can also be prevented (Richgels et al. 2016). Despite the obvious challenges, including poor vaccine uptake and unintended targets, several groups have taken this approach.

In an ambitious 2-year study, 29 paired plots of land seeded with either a sylvatic plague vaccine (SPV), a virally vectored bait system vaccine, or a placebo were compared in 7 Western states in the USA. The capture of unique prairie dogs on vaccine-treated fields was significantly higher in each of the years tested, suggesting that an SPV can protect prairie dogs from sylvatic plague (Rocke et al. 2017). In a separate 3-year study, bait uptake of the SPV vaccine was as high as 70% over 58 plots of land. Interestingly, heavier animals exhibited increased bait uptake, and baiting later in the growing season influenced bait uptake (Abbott et al. 2018). In parallel, Tripp et al. (2017) compared the effectiveness of dusting prairie dog burrows with an insecticide to baiting with an oral SPV. In two of the three plots evaluated, pesticide dusting and oral SPV improved prairie dog survival and suggested a method by which the species can be protected from collapse due to plague-induced mortality (Tripp et al. 2017). Additionally, Bron et al. (2018) sought to evaluate the impact of a SPV on non-target rodents over a 3-year period. Although targeting protection in prairie dogs, 70% of the bait-based vaccine was consumed by non-target rodents in which no effects were observed (Bron et al. 2018).

Future considerations

Generally, it is believed that live-attenuated vaccines confer the highest degree of protection, generate robust humoral and cell-mediated responses, and typically result in long-term or life-long immunity (Slifka and Amanna 2014; US Department of Health and Human Services n.d.). However, the challenge associated with live-attenuated vaccines is the threat of a low-frequency reversion event restoring full virulence, which can now be circumvented by the development of new generation designer vaccines.

Interestingly, some unintended pathologies could be rooted in host genetics rather than reversion of the attenuated Y. pestis strain. In one such example, a researcher died following exposure to a laboratory nonpigmented (pgm−), attenuated mutant UC91309 Y. pestis strain (unable to produce the yersiniabactin siderophore required for iron acquisition). The patient was found to have been compromised by the inherited genetic malady hemochromatosis, resulting in increased iron within tissues (Frank et al. 2011). In fact, increased iron presence within host tissues was shown to complement Y. pestis pgm− attenuated strains in a murine model, and vaccination using a subunit vaccine was sufficient to achieve protection upon challenge (Quenee et al. 2012). Furthermore, in a Y. pestis EV76 murine vaccine study, mobilized iron-regulating factors supported vaccine efficacy. More specifically, hemopexin (a host heme binding protein) and transferrin (a host iron-binding protein) demonstrated anti-bacterial properties in the serum of EV76-immunized mice shortly following the immunization (Zauberman et al. 2017). Based on those findings, patients should be pre-screened, and subunit vaccines should be offered, if available, to avoid host factors complementing live-attenuated vaccine strains.

Subunit vaccine efforts tend to favor F1, LcrV, or combinations thereof; however, screening for novel candidates is ongoing. In one such effort, over 4000 Y. pestis proteins were screened computationally and experimentally for the ability to elicit a cell-mediated response by CD8+ T cells. Ultimately, 178 unique CD8+ T cell epitopes, derived from 113 Y. pestis proteins, were identified and could be exploited as novel antigens in subunit vaccine development (Zvi et al. 2017). Additionally, novel clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat interference (CRISPRi) techniques allow reversible characterization of virulence potential of these novel gene candidates (Wang et al. 2019), which could be exploited as future vaccine targets.

In the event of a widespread bio-attack, attention has centered on post-exposure antibiotic treatment. However, as mentioned earlier, drug-resistant strains are naturally occurring; moreover, Y. pestis could be engineered as a multiple-drug-resistant weapon (Rosenzweig et al. 2011). As a result, a mouse model was employed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined post-exposure vaccination followed by antibiotic treatment with a second-line chemotherapeutic. More specifically, a live-attenuated EV76 immunization was paired with a lethal pneumonic challenge and subsequent antibiotic treatment (with a second-line chemotherapeutic); the vaccine and antibiotic treatment worked synergistically to arrest disease progression and lessen morbidity (Zauberman et al. 2019).

With regard to Y. pestis, the reemerging plague pathogen that could become weaponized; novel approaches and creative strategies need to be applied and translated into viable prophylactic and post-exposure treatments. A vaccine that is well tolerated with high efficacy and has the ability to promote cell-mediated and humoral responses is the plague research community’s top priority. While some progress has been made on live-attenuated candidates, subunit vaccines still appear to be the favored approach in filling the plague vaccine void. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted an unprecedentedly short turn around on two approved mRNA vaccine deliverables, and two adenovirus-based vaccines. With renewed awareness of the seriousness global pandemics can pose to human health and economic stability, perhaps approval of a novel plague vaccine is adequately motivated. Importantly, a combinatorial approach of Ad5-YFV vaccine followed by a booster of live-attenuated LMA or LMP mutant or vice versa could be highly advantageous for preventative and reactive scenarios, as well as more effective possibly due to differing mechanisms of protection provided by these two vaccines. Furthermore, both vaccines can be administered by the intranasal route, avoiding the use of needles. Such studies are being conducted in our laboratory.