Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Brewster angle microscopy of the surface film of human broncho-alveolar lavage fluid

  • Article
  • Published:
European Biophysics Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The morphology, thickness and surface pressure of the surfactant film of broncho-alveoalar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with sarcoidosis were investigated during spontaneous adsorption of the BAL's surface active material at the air/aqueous buffer interface at 37 °C. The biochemical parameters of the BAL fluid determined were protein (Lowry), total phospholipids (from phosphate after ashing) and the individual phospholipids (HPLC). During the spontaneous adsorption of the pulmonary surfactant the surface pressure increased from initially 26 mN/m to 44 mN/m in the equilibrium state. Simultaneously to the increase of the surface pressure, a continuous increase of the reflectivity signal was observed by quantitative Brewster angle microscopy (BAM). The film thickness is calculated from the reflectivity values using an optical model. The effect of the uncertainty of the refractive index, which has to be estimated, is discussed. The BAM images show the inhomogeneous nature of the surfactant film with three distinct phases of different reflectivity, even at relatively low surface pressures. For the brightest phase, the thickness amounts to approximately 12 nm in the equilibrium state of adsorption. This suggests a multilamellar structure. Additionally, we found visual evidence for an adsorption mechanism involving the spreading of vesicles at the interface, in agreement with published results. Differences in the morphology and thickness of the pulmonary surfactant film reported in the literature are obviously due to the varying experimental conditions and materials. We think that the experimental conditions chosen in our study provide a more realistic view of the structure in the lungs in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An example of a non-photometric measurement is the nulling ellipsometry which measures the rotation angles of optical elements at a signal minimum. In this case the absolute magnitude of the signal is not important

  2. The approximation may be easily derived using (1) the trigonometric relations following from the fact that, at the Brewster angle, reflected and refracted beams are perpendicular, (2) Brewster' s law and (3) a thin film approximation where the thickness of the film is small compared to the wavelength

  3. Special care has to be taken with the background signal of the camera when no light is present, as this "black level" will not be scaled in the same way as the light signal when the exposure time changes

  4. A non-linear response, e.g. at high brightness levels, would result in a deviation from the linear curve

  5. The gray level resolution of the camera is not changed by a factor of 20 in this way. For each setting of the exposure time, G still has 8-bit resolution

References

  • Allen R (1940) The estimation of phosphorus. Biochem J 34:858–862

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amrein M, von Nahmen A, Sieber M (1997) A scanning force- and fluorescence light microscopy study of the structure and function of a model pulmonary surfactant. Eur Biophys J 26:349–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azzam RMA, Bashara NM (1987) Ellipsometry and polarized light. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Brown ES (1964) Isolation and assay of dipalmitoyl lecithin in lung extracts. Am J Physiol 207:402–406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bünger H, Pison U (1995) Quantitative analysis of pulmonary surfactant phospholipids by high-performance liquid chromatography and light-scattering detection. J Chromatogr B 672:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements JA, Brown ES, Johnson R (1958) Pulmonary surface tension and the mucus lining of the lung: some theoretical considerations. J Appl Physiol 12:262–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creuwel LAJM, van Golde LMG, Hangsman HP (1997) The pulmonary surfactant system: biochemical and clinical aspects. Lung 175:1–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz A, Casals C, Keough KMW, Pérez-Gil J (1997) Different modes of interaction of pulmonary surfactant protein SP-B in phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochem J 327:133–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Mul MNG, Mann JA (1998) Determination of the thickness and optical properties of a Langmuir film from the domain morphology by Brewster angle microscopy. Langmuir 14:2455–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Discher BM, Schief WR, Vogel V, Hall SB (1999) Phase separation in monolayers of pulmonary surfactant phospholipids at the air-water interface: composition and structure. Biophys J 77:2051–2061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enzian P, Barth J (1990) Bronchoalveolar lavage. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 115:663–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folch J, Lees M, Stanlay GHS (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J Biol Chem 226:497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey W, Schief WR, Vogel V (1996) Two dimensional crystallization of streptavidin studied by quantitative Brewster angle microscopy. Langmuir 12:1312–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galla HJ, Bourdos N, von Nahmen A, Amrein M, Sieber M (1998) The role of pulmonary protein C during the breathing cycle. Thin Solid Films 327–329:632–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerke J (1998) Pulmonary surfactant: functions and molecular composition. Biochim Biophys Acta 1408:79–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goerke J, Clements JA (1986) Alveolar surface tension and lung surfactant. In: Fishman AP (ed) Handbook of physiology, section 3: the respiratory system, vol. III, part 1. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Md., pp 247–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RA, Rohatgi PK, Bergofsky EH, Block ER, Daniele RP, Dantzker DR, Davis GS, Hunnighake GW, King TE Jr, Metzger WJ (1990) Clinical role of bronchoalveolar lavage in adults with pulmonary disease [see comments]. Am Rev Respir Dis 142:481–486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griese M (1999) Pulmonary surfactant in health and human lung diseases: state of the art. Eur Respir J 13:1455–1476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunder R, Gehr P, Bachofen H, Schürch S, Siegenthaler H (1999) Structures of surfactant films: a scanning force microscopy study. Eur Respir J 14:1290–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hönig D, Möbius D (1991) Direct visualization of monolayers at air-water interface by Brewster angle microscopy. J Phys Chem 95:4590–4592

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson J, Curstedt T (1997) Molecular structures and interactions of pulmonary surfactant components. Eur J Biochem 244:675–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson J, Curstedt T, Robertson B (1994) The proteins of the surfactant system. Eur Respir J 7:372–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keough KMW (1992) Physical chemistry of pulmonary surfactant in the terminal air spaces. In: Robertson B, van Golde LMG, Batenburg JJ (eds) Pulmonary surfactant: from molecular biology to clinical practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 109–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer A, Wintergarten A, Sieber M, Galla HJ, Amrein M, Guckenberger R ( 2000) Distribution of the surfactant-associated protein C within a lung surfactant model film investigated by near-field optical microscopy. Biophys J 78:458–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger P, Schalke M, Wang Z, Notter RH, Dluhy RA, Lösche M (1999) Effect of hydrophobic surfactant peptides SP-B and SP-C on binary phospholipid monolayers. I. Fluorescence and dark field microscopy. Biophys J 77:903–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Padrid PA, Cross CE (1990) Bronchoalveolar lavage. Clin Rev Allergy 8:305–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck GA, Hönig D, Möbius D (1994) Stars, stripes and shells in monolayers: simulation of the molecular arrangement in Schlieren structures. Thin Solid Films 242:213–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattle RE (1958) Properties, function, and origin of the alveolar lining layer. Proc R Soc London Ser B 148:2176–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Gil J, Keough MW (1998) Interfacial properties of surfactant proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1408:203–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schürch S, Green FHY, Bachofen H (1998) Formation and structure of the surface film: captive bubble surfactometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1408:180–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veldhusen R, Nag K, Orgeig S, Possmayer F (1998) The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant. Biochim Biophys Acta 1408:90–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Nahmen A, Schenk M, Sieber M, Amrein M (1997) The structure of a model pulmonary surfactant as revealed by scanning force microscopy. Biophys J 72:463–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters RW, Jeng RR, Hall SB (2000) Distinct steps in the adsorption of pulmonary surfactant to an air-liquid interface. Biophys J 78:257–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (project number: 13N7283/0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Winsel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winsel, K., Hönig, D., Lunkenheimer, K. et al. Quantitative Brewster angle microscopy of the surface film of human broncho-alveolar lavage fluid. Eur Biophys J 32, 544–552 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-003-0290-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-003-0290-2

Keywords

Navigation