Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Level of Development and Successional Stages in Biological Soil Crusts with Biological Indicators

  • Soil Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (BSCs) perform vital ecosystem services, but the difference in biological components or developmental level still affects the rate and type of these services. In order to differentiate crust successional stages in quantity and analyze the relationship between crust developmental level and successional stages, this work determined several biological indicators in a series of different developmental BSCs in the Shapotou region of China. The results showed that crust developmental level (level of development index) can be well indicated by crust biological indicators. Photosynthetic biomass was the most appropriate to differentiate crust successional stages, although both photosynthetic biomass and respiration intensity increased with the development and succession of BSCs. Based on of the different biological compositions, BSCs were quantificationally categorized into different successional stages including cyanobacterial crusts (lichen and moss coverages <20 %), lichen crusts (lichen coverage >20 % but moss coverage <20 %), semi-moss crusts (moss coverage >20 % but <75 %), and moss crusts (moss coverage >75 %). In addition, it was found that cyanobacterial and microalgal biomass first increased as cyanobacterial crusts formed, then decreased when lots of mosses emerged on the crust surface; however nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and heterotrophic microbes increased in the later developmental BSCs. The structural adjustment of biological components in the different developmental BSCs may reflect the requirement of crust survival and material transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lange OL, Kidron EL, Büdel B, Meyer A, Kilian E, Abeliovich A (1992) Taxonomic composition and photosynthetic characteristics of the ‘biological soil crusts’ covering sand dunes in the western Negev Desert. Funct Ecol 6:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaady E, Kuhn U, Wilske B, Sandoval-Soto L, Kesselmeier J (2000) Patterns of CO2 exchange in biological soil crusts of successional age. Soil Biol Biochem 32:959–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu CX, Zhang DL, Liu YD (2004) Research progress on algae of the microbial crusts in arid and semiarid regions. Prog Nat Sci 14:289–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu CX, Liu YD, Song LR, Zhang DL (2002) Effect of desert soil algae on the stabilization of fine sands. J Appl Phycol 14:281–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acea MJ, Prieto-Fernández A, Diz-Cid N (2003) Cyanobacterial inoculation of heated soils: effect on microorganisms of C and N cycles and on chemical composition in soil surface. Soil Biol Biochem 35:513–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lan SB, Hu CX, Rao BQ, Wu L, Zhang DL, Liu YD (2010) Non-rainfall water sources in the topsoil and their changes during formation of man-made algal crusts at the eastern edge of Qubqi Desert, Inner Mongolia. Sci China Life Sci 53:1135–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Belnap J, Lange OL (2001) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bowker MA, Soliveres S, Maestre FT (2010) Competition increases with abiotic stress and regulates the diversity of biological soil crusts. J Ecol 98:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu CX, Liu YD (2003) Primary succession of algal community structure in desert soil. Acta Bot Sin 45:917–924

    Google Scholar 

  10. Su YG, Li XR, Zheng JG, Huang G (2009) The effect of biological soil crusts of different successional stages and conditions on the germination of seeds of three desert plants. J Arid Environ 73:931–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Housman DC, Powers HH, Collins AD, Belnap J (2006) Carbon and nitrogen fixation differ between successional stages of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. J Arid Environ 66:620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castle SC, Morrison CD, Barger NN (2011) Extraction of chlorophyll a from biological soil crusts: a comparison of solvents for spectrophotometric determination. Soil Biol Biochem 43(4):853–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lan SB, Wu L, Zhang DL, Hu CX, Liu YD (2010) Effects of drought and salt stresses on man-made cyanobacterial crusts. Eur J Soil Biol 46:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Castenholz RW, Garcia-Pichel F (2000) Cyanobacterial responses to UV-radiation. In: Whitton BA, Potts M (eds) Ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  15. Redfield E, Barns SM, Belnap J, Daane LL, Kuske CR (2002) Comparative diversity and composition of cyanobacteria in three predominant soil crusts of the Colorado Plateau. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu L, Lan SB, Zhang DL, Hu CX (2011) The structure and small-scale vertical distribution of the algae in lichen soil crusts. Microb Ecol 62:715–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Witwicki DL, Miller ME (2008) Visually assessing the level of development and soil surface stability of cyanobacterially dominated biological soil crusts. J Arid Environ 72:1257–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lan SB, Wu L, Zhang DL, Hu CX, Liu YD (2011) Ethanol outperforms multiple solvents in the extraction of chlorophyll-a from biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 43:857–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lan SB, Wu L, Zhang DL, Hu CX (2012) Successional stages of biological soil crusts and their microstructure variability in Shapotou region (China). Environ Earth Sci 65(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao BQ, Liu YD, Lan SB, Wu PP, Wang WB, Li DH (2012) Effects of sand burial stress on the early developments of cyanobacterial crusts in the field. Eur J Soil Biol 48:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li DH, Xing W, Li GB, Liu YD (2009) Cytochemical changes in the developmental process of Nostoc sphaeroides (cyanobacterium). J Appl Phycol 21:119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Namjing Institute of Soil Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (1980) Analysis of soil physico-chemical features. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abed RMM, Kharusi SA, Schramm A, Robinson MD (2010) Bacterial diversity, pigments and nitrogen fixation of biological desert crusts from the Sultanate of Oman. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:418–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu RK (1999) Analysis methods in soil agricultural chemistry. Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li XR, Zhou HY, Wang XP, Zhu YG, O’Conner PJ (2003) The effects of revegetation on cryptogam species diversity in Tengger Desert, Northern China. Plant Soil 251:237–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brostoff WN (2002) Cryptobiotic crusts of a seasonally inundated Dune–Pan system at Edwards Air Force Base, Western Mojave Desert, California. J Arid Environ 51:339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stradling DA, Thygerson T, Walker JA, Smith BN, Hansen LD, Criddle RS, Pendleton RL (2002) Cryptogamic crust metabolism in response to temperature, water vapor, and liquid water. Thermochimica 394:219–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kidron GJ, Vonshak A, Abeliovich A (2008) Recovery rates of microbiotic crusts within a dune ecosystem in the Negev Desert. Geomorphology 100:444–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Garcia-Pichel F, Pringault O (2001) Cyanobacteria track water in desert soils. Nature 413:380–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harper KT, Marble JR (1988) A role for nonvascular plants in management of arid and semiarid rangeland. In: Tueller PT (ed) Vegetation science applications for rangeland analysis and management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  31. Belnap J (1995) Surface disturbances: their role in accelerating desertification. Environ Monit Assess 37:39–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lange OL, Belnap J, Reichenberger H, Meyer A (1997) Photosynthesis of green algal soil crust lichens from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange. Flora 192:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  33. Langhans TM, Storm C, Schwabe A (2010) Regeneration processes of biological soil crusts, macro-cryptogams and vascular plants species after fine-scale disturbance in a temperate region: recolonization or successional replacement? Flora 205:46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pickett STA, McDonnell MJ (1989) Changing perspectives in community dynamics: a theory of successional forces. Trends Ecol Evol 4:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao BQ, Wang WB, Lan SB, Li DH, Hu CX, Liu YD (2009) Development characteristics and distribution of microorganisms within 3-year-old artificial algal crusts in Hopq Desert. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 33(5):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu N, Pan BR, Zhang YM, Wang HL, Liang SM, Nie HL (2005) Vertical distribution patterns of soil microorganisms relating to biological crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Xingjiang. Chin J Appl Environ Biol 11(3):349–353

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ward DM, Bateson MM, Weller R, Ruff-Roberts AL (1992) Ribosomal RNA analysis of microorganisms as they occur in nature. Adv Microb Ecol 12:219–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Head IM, Saunders JR, Pickup RW (1998) Microbial evolution, diversity, and ecology: a decade of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultivated microorganisms. Microb Ecol 35:1–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahmadjian V (1993) The lichen symbiosis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang YM, Wang HL, Wang XQ, Yang WK, Zhang DY (2006) The microstructure of microbiotic crust and its influence on wind erosion for a sandy soil surface in the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Geoderma 132:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lan SB, Wu L, Zhang DL, Hu CX (2012) Composition of photosynthetic organisms and diurnal changes of photosynthetic efficiency in algae and moss crusts. Plant Soil 351:325–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Büdel B, Darienko T, Deutschewith K, Dojani S, Friedl T, Mohr KI, Salisch M, Reisser W, Weber B (2009) Southern African biological soil crusts are ubiquitous and highly diverse in drylands, being restricted by rainfall frequency. Microb Ecol 57:229–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Langhans TM, Storm C, Schwabe A (2009) Community assembly of biological soil crusts of different successional stages in a temperate sand ecosystem, as assessed by direct determination and enrichment techniques. Microb Ecol 58:394–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Eldridge DJ, Greene RSB (1994) Microbiotic soil crust: a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia. Aust J Soil Res 32:389–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Evans RD, Johansen JR (1999) Microbiotic crusts and ecosystem processes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:183–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. West NE (1990) Structure and function of microphytic soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions. Adv Ecol Res 20:179–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xie ZM, Liu YD, Hu CX, Chen LZ, Li DH (2007) Relationships between the biomass of algal crusts in fields and their compressive strength. Soil Biol Biochem 39:567–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S et al (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang YM (2005) The microstructure and formation of biological soil crusts in their early developmental stage. Chin Sci Bull 50:117–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was kindly supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31170464).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Algal Biology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Shubin Lan, Li Wu & Chunxiang Hu

  2. Department of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Delu Zhang

Authors
  1. Shubin Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Delu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunxiang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunxiang Hu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 157 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lan, S., Wu, L., Zhang, D. et al. Assessing Level of Development and Successional Stages in Biological Soil Crusts with Biological Indicators. Microb Ecol 66, 394–403 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0191-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0191-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation