Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity of Bacterial Isolates from Commercial and Homemade Composts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diversity of heterotrophic bacterial isolates of three commercial and two homemade composts was studied. The commercial composts were produced from poultry litter (PC), sewage sludge (SC), municipal solid waste (MC), and homemade composts (thermal compost [DC] and vermicompost [VC]) from food wastes. The taxonomic and physiological diversity of the heterotrophic culturable bacteria was assessed using phenotypic and genotypic characterization and the analysis of the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence. Composts DC and SC presented the higher genotypic diversity, as could be inferred from the number of distinct genotypic patterns observed, 28 and 21, respectively. Gram-positive bacteria, mainly Firmicutes, were predominant in all the composts. Some organisms related with taxa rarely reported in composts, as Rhodanobacter spathiphylli, Moraxella osloensis, Lysobacter, Corynebacterium, Pigmentiphaga kullae, and new taxa were also isolated. The highest relative proportion of isolates able to degrade starch was found in compost SC (>70%), to degrade gelatine in compost DC (>70%), to degrade Tween 80 in compost PC (>90%), and to degrade poly-epsilon-caprolactones in compost DC (>80%). Compost MC presented the lowest relative proportions of isolates able to degrade starch (<25%), gelatine (<20%), and poly-epsilon-caprolactone (<40%). When compared with the others, the homemade composts presented higher relative proportions of Gram-positive isolates able to inhibit the target organisms Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In compost MC, none of the Gram-positive isolates was able to inhibit those targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dees PM, Ghiorse WC (2001) Microbial diversity in hot synthetic compost as revealed by PCR-amplified rRNA sequences from cultivated isolates and extracted DNA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35:207–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein E (1997) The Science of Composting. Technomic Publication, Lancaster, PA, ISBN 1-56676-478-5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fang M, Wong JMC (2000) Changes in thermophilic bacteria population and diversity during composting of coal fly ash and sewage sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut 124:333–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira da Silva M, Tiago I, Veríssimo A, Boaventura AR, Nunes OC, Manaia CM (2006) Antibiotic resistance of enterococci and related bacteria in an urban wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55:322–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira da Silva M, Vaz-Moreira I, Gonzalez-Pajuelo M, Nunes OC, Manaia CM (2007) Antimicrobial resistance patterns in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from an urban wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:166–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fracchia L, Dohrmann AB, Martinotti MG, Tebbe CC (2006) Bacterial diversity in finished compost and vermicompost: differences revealed by cultivation-independent analyses of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:942–952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haruta S, Nakayama T, Nakamura K, Hemmi H, Ishii M, Igarashi Y, Nishino T (2005) Microbial diversity in biodegradation and reutilization processes of garbage (review). J Biosc Bioeng 99(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassen A, Belguith K, Jedidi N, Cherif A, Cherif M, Boudabous A (2001) Microbial characterization during composting of municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol 80:217–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasaridi K, Protopapa I, Kotsou M, Pilidis G, Manios T, Kyriacou A (2006) Quality assessment of composts in the Greek market: the need for standards and quality assurance. J Environ Manag 80(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pietronave S, Fracchia L, Rinaldi M, Martinotti MG (2004) Influence of biotic and abiotic factors on human pathogens in a finished compost. Water Res 38:1963–1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Silva E, Vaz-Moreira I, Silva C, Sarabando H, Nunes OC, Manaia CM, Cunha-Queda C (2006) A contribution for a quality study of several composts produced in Portugal—ORBIT 2006 biological waste management: from local to global. 5th International Conference, Weimar, Germany

  12. Strom PF (1985) Identification of thermophilic bacteria in solid-waste composting. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:906–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takaku H, Kodaira S, Kimoto A, Nashimoto M, Takagi M (2006) Microbial communities in the garbage composting with rice hull as an amendment revealed by culture-dependent and independent approaches. J Biosci Bioeng 101:42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiago I, Teixeira I, Silva S, Chung P, Veríssimo A, Manaia CM (2004) Metabolic and genetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria isolated from composted municipal sludge on poly-ɛ-caprolactones. Curr Microbiol 49:407–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiquia SM (2002) Evolution of extracellular enzyme activities during manure composting. J Appl Microbiol 92(4):764–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaz-Moreira I, Nobre MF, Nunes OC, Manaia CM (2007) Pseudosphingobacterium domesticum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from home-made compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1535–1538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaz-Moreira I, Faria C, Nobre MF, Schumann P, Nunes OC, Manaia CM (2007) Paenibacillus humicus, sp. nov., isolated from chicken poultry litter compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (in press)

  18. Versalovic K, Koeuth T, Lupski JR (1991) Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in Eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 19(24):6823–6831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei Y, Fan Y, Wang M, Wang J (2000) Composting and compost application in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:277–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yilmaz M, Soran H, Beyatli Y (2006) Antimicrobial activities of some Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the soil. Microbiol Res 161:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Margarida Silva and Engr. Conceição Almeida of the Grupo de Estudos Ambientais of Escola Superior de Biotecnologia for supplying the homemade composts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga C. Nunes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaz-Moreira, I., Silva, M.E., Manaia, C.M. et al. Diversity of Bacterial Isolates from Commercial and Homemade Composts. Microb Ecol 55, 714–722 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9314-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9314-2

Navigation